• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验对集体决策的影响。

The effect of experience on collective decision-making.

作者信息

Tovah Kashetsky, Janice Yan, Grant Doering, Tricia Skelton, Reuven Dukas

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University.

Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2023 Oct 28:104962. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104962.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104962
PMID:39492432
Abstract

Social groups repeatedly solving a complex task can improve their collective performance. To study the mechanisms of collective improvement, we tested the effect of experience on collective decision-making using acorn ants (Temnothorax ambiguus). During a six-emigration training phase, colonies in the choice treatment gained experience choosing to move into one of two nests varying in quality, while colonies in the no-choice treatment had only a single available nest. Both treatments were tested in a subsequent test with two nests of varying quality. We found that experience improved decision-making speed, regardless of treatment. We also found that colonies of the choice treatment were more proficient by carrying a larger proportion of individuals directly into the better-quality nest. However, there was no steady improvement in proficiency throughout their training. Using social network analysis, we quantified changes in group performance over successive emigrations. We found that network density, our measure for social connectedness, and the coefficient of variation of out-strength distribution, our measure for workload distribution, did not differ between treatments and remained stable over successive emigrations. We conclude that collective experience with decision-making may improve subsequent group performance, but the mechanisms of improvement remain unclear. Further research on decision-making in house-hunting ants will advance our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning collective improvement.

摘要

反复解决复杂任务的社会群体能够提高其集体表现。为了研究集体进步的机制,我们使用橡子蚁(Temnothorax ambiguus)测试了经验对集体决策的影响。在一个为期六次迁移的训练阶段,处于选择处理组的蚁群获得了选择迁入两个质量不同的巢穴之一的经验,而处于无选择处理组的蚁群只有一个可用的巢穴。在随后的测试中,对两种处理方式都使用了两个质量不同的巢穴进行测试。我们发现,无论处理方式如何,经验都提高了决策速度。我们还发现,选择处理组的蚁群通过将更大比例的个体直接迁入质量更好的巢穴而更加熟练。然而,在整个训练过程中,熟练程度并没有稳步提高。使用社会网络分析,我们量化了连续迁移过程中群体表现的变化。我们发现,作为社会连通性度量的网络密度,以及作为工作量分布度量的出度分布变异系数,在不同处理方式之间没有差异,并且在连续迁移过程中保持稳定。我们得出结论,决策方面的集体经验可能会提高后续群体的表现,但改进机制仍不清楚。对寻找住所的蚂蚁的决策进行进一步研究将增进我们对集体进步背后机制的理解。

相似文献

1
The effect of experience on collective decision-making.经验对集体决策的影响。
Behav Processes. 2023 Oct 28:104962. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104962.
2
Improving decision speed, accuracy and group cohesion through early information gathering in house-hunting ants.通过在寻屋蚂蚁中尽早收集信息来提高决策速度、准确性和群体凝聚力。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 29;5(9):e13059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013059.
3
Rational time investment during collective decision making in ants.蚂蚁的集体决策中的理性时间投入。
Biol Lett. 2019 Oct 31;15(10):20190542. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0542. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Speed versus accuracy in decision-making ants: expediting politics and policy implementation.决策蚂蚁中的速度与准确性:加速政治与政策实施
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):845-52. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0224.
5
How collective comparisons emerge without individual comparisons of the options.在没有对选项进行个体比较的情况下,集体比较是如何出现的。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jul 22;281(1787). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0737. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
6
An Upper and Lower Bound for the Convergence Time of House-Hunting in Ant Colonies.蚂蚁找巢时间收敛的上下界。
J Comput Biol. 2022 Apr;29(4):344-357. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2021.0364. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Variability in individual assessment behaviour and its implications for collective decision-making.个体评估行为的变异性及其对集体决策的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 8;284(1848). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2237.
8
A simple threshold rule is sufficient to explain sophisticated collective decision-making.简单的阈值规则足以解释复杂的集体决策。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019981. Epub 2011 May 24.
9
Why do house-hunting ants recruit in both directions?为什么寻找巢穴的蚂蚁会双向招募同伴?
Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Nov;94(11):911-8. doi: 10.1007/s00114-007-0273-8. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
10
Do ants make direct comparisons?蚂蚁会进行直接比较吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 22;276(1667):2635-41. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0350. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolution of division of labour: preconditions and evolutionary feedback.劳动分工的演变:前提条件与进化反馈。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Mar 20;380(1922):20230262. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0262.
2
Disruption of collective behaviour correlates with reduced interaction efficiency.集体行为的破坏与互动效率降低相关。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Mar;292(2043):20250039. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0039. Epub 2025 Mar 19.