• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建的“席尔瓦技术”等同于全关节镜技术吗?一项前瞻性单中心研究:一种使用胫骨隧道和骨移植的替代性前交叉韧带全关节镜重建技术

Is Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction "Silva Technique" Equal to All-Inside Techniques? A Prospective Single-Center Study: An Alternative ACL All-Inside Reconstruction Technique Using a Tibial Tunnel and Bone Graft.

作者信息

Karampinas Panagiotis, Vlamis John, Galanis Athanasios, Vavourakis Michail, Sakellariou Evangelos, Varsamos Iordanis, Spyrou Ioannis, Pneumaticos Spiros

机构信息

3rd Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Adv Orthop. 2024 Oct 26;2024:2371242. doi: 10.1155/2024/2371242. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/2371242
PMID:39493370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11531358/
Abstract

The development of less invasive all-inside techniques regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery has been associated with various advantages, including fewer complications and reduced postoperative pain. Silva et al. described a quadruple semitendinosus graft construct and suspensory button fixation for ACL reconstruction as an alternative technique. At the end of this technique, the tibial tunnel is filled with a bone autograft plug. This paper aims to examine the incorporation of the autograft and thus evaluate whether the "Silva technique" provides the same benefits as all-inside techniques. A prospective study assessed 31 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery using the "Silva technique." The cases involved in the study were skeletally mature patients with no previous history of ACL surgery or multiligamentous instability. All patients followed the same rehabilitation program and were examined at three standardized follow-up visits: 4 months, 8 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Tegner-Lysholm knee score (TLKS), visual analog score (VAS) for pain, and the IKDC subjective knee score were completed at every visit. A knee MRI scan was performed at every scheduled visit to assess bone graft incorporation and remodeling. TLKS scores revealed a considerable improvement compared to preoperative figures, from 57.2 points preoperatively to an average of 99.4 at the 12-month follow-up ( < 0.0001). VAS scores were substantially ameliorated after the operation and until the second follow-up visit, from 5 before surgery to zero 8 months after the operation, with no noteworthy alterations afterward ( < 0.0001). IKDC subjective knee score outcomes were found to have increased at the last follow-up, from 59.3 prior to surgery to 99.8 12 months postoperatively ( < 0.0001). Regarding the MRI features of the bone autograft, the tibial tunnel was entirely filled by bone formation at the last MRI scan, suggesting complete integration of the autograft in all patients. Bone autograft employed to seal the tibial tunnel was completely incorporated in all cases 1 year postoperatively. The "Silva technique" appears to feature all the avails of all-inside techniques, whilst it seems to be simpler and easier than them after the surgeon is familiarized with its particular aspects. It is a robust option in orthopedic surgeons' arsenal. However, further large-scale pertinent research is requisite to confirm the findings of this study.

摘要

前交叉韧带(ACL)重建手术中微创全内置技术的发展带来了诸多优势,包括并发症更少和术后疼痛减轻。席尔瓦等人描述了一种用于ACL重建的四重半腱肌移植物构建和悬吊纽扣固定术作为替代技术。在该技术结束时,胫骨隧道用自体骨移植栓填充。本文旨在研究自体骨移植的融合情况,从而评估“席尔瓦技术”是否能提供与全内置技术相同的益处。一项前瞻性研究评估了31例行“席尔瓦技术”ACL重建手术的患者。该研究纳入的病例为骨骼成熟患者,既往无ACL手术史或多韧带不稳定病史。所有患者遵循相同的康复计划,并在术后4个月、8个月和1年这三个标准化随访时间点接受检查。每次随访时均完成Tegner-Lysholm膝关节评分(TLKS)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)以及IKDC主观膝关节评分。每次预定随访时均进行膝关节MRI扫描,以评估骨移植的融合和重塑情况。TLKS评分显示与术前相比有显著改善,从术前的57.2分提高到12个月随访时的平均99.4分(<0.0001)。术后直至第二次随访时VAS评分有显著改善,从术前的5分降至术后8个月的零分,此后无明显变化(<0.0001)。IKDC主观膝关节评分结果在最后一次随访时有所提高,从术前的59.3分提高到术后12个月的99.8分(<0.0001)。关于自体骨移植的MRI特征,在最后一次MRI扫描时胫骨隧道完全被骨形成填充,表明所有患者的自体骨移植均完全融合。用于封闭胫骨隧道的自体骨移植在术后1年的所有病例中均完全融合。“席尔瓦技术”似乎具备全内置技术的所有优点,而且在外科医生熟悉其特定方面后,似乎比全内置技术更简单易行。它是骨科医生武器库中的一个有力选择。然而,需要进一步的大规模相关研究来证实本研究的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4525/11531358/477b4dead65a/AORTH2024-2371242.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4525/11531358/3dd715682460/AORTH2024-2371242.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4525/11531358/477b4dead65a/AORTH2024-2371242.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4525/11531358/3dd715682460/AORTH2024-2371242.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4525/11531358/477b4dead65a/AORTH2024-2371242.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction "Silva Technique" Equal to All-Inside Techniques? A Prospective Single-Center Study: An Alternative ACL All-Inside Reconstruction Technique Using a Tibial Tunnel and Bone Graft.前交叉韧带重建的“席尔瓦技术”等同于全关节镜技术吗?一项前瞻性单中心研究:一种使用胫骨隧道和骨移植的替代性前交叉韧带全关节镜重建技术
Adv Orthop. 2024 Oct 26;2024:2371242. doi: 10.1155/2024/2371242. eCollection 2024.
2
Outcomes of retro-drilled all-inside tibial tunnel vs complete tibial tunnel techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a comparative study.前交叉韧带重建中逆行钻孔全内置胫骨隧道与完整胫骨隧道技术的疗效比较研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Apr;32(3):523-532. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03011-2. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, bone patellar tendon, or quadriceps tendon-graft with press-fit fixation without hardware. A new and innovative procedure.使用半腱肌和股薄肌腱、骨髌腱或股四头肌肌腱移植物进行前交叉韧带重建,采用压配固定且无金属硬件。一种全新且创新的手术方法。
Orthop Clin North Am. 2003 Jan;34(1):49-64. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00070-6.
4
[Comparative study of I.D.E.A.L. technique and transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].[前交叉韧带重建中IDEAL技术与经胫骨技术的比较研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 15;38(8):987-994. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402029.
5
Hybrid Bone-Grafting Technique for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.分期翻修前交叉韧带重建的混合骨移植技术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Oct 12;11(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00055. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
6
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.采用单束髌腱移植并胫骨嵌体固定进行后交叉韧带重建:2至10年随访
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Mar;32(2):346-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261511.
7
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft: A Matched Cohort Comparison of the All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques.自体腘绳肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带:全内置技术与完整胫骨隧道技术的配对队列比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jan 8;7(1):2325967118820297. doi: 10.1177/2325967118820297. eCollection 2019 Jan.
8
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between All-inside and Standard Technique in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 6-strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft.6 股腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带的全内与标准技术的临床疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2024 May;16(5):1034-1041. doi: 10.1111/os.13982. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
[Anatomical All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Semitendinosus Tendon Graft with Posteromedial Harvest - Clinical Results of Prospective Study at a Minimum 12-Months Follow-up].[使用经后内侧取材的四倍半腱肌腱移植物进行解剖学全关节内前交叉韧带重建——至少随访12个月的前瞻性研究临床结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(2):94-101.
10
Randomized controlled trial comparing all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a full tibial tunnel.随机对照试验比较全内前交叉韧带重建技术与全胫骨隧道前交叉韧带重建技术。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul;29(7):1195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.04.009.

本文引用的文献

1
All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: Tips and Tricks.全内前交叉韧带重建技术:技巧与窍门
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 6;12(18):5793. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185793.
2
Post-Operative Modified All-Inside ACL Reconstruction Technique's Clinical Outcomes and Isokinetic Strength Assessments.术后改良全内置前交叉韧带重建技术的临床疗效及等速肌力评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 29;13(17):2787. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172787.
3
Evaluation of Isokinetic Knee Strengths after ACL Reconstruction with Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Four-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw Fixation.
前交叉韧带重建术后采用四股半腱肌悬吊股骨和胫骨固定与四股半腱肌和股薄肌悬吊股骨和胫骨螺钉固定的等速膝关节力量评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 12;12(12):4004. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124004.
4
The Relationship between Lower Extremity Functional Performance and Balance after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results of Patients Treated with the Modified All-Inside Technique.前交叉韧带重建术后下肢功能表现与平衡之间的关系:采用改良全内置技术治疗患者的结果
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 2;13(3):466. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030466.
5
All-inside versus complete tibial tunnel techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.全内视镜与完整胫骨隧道技术在前交叉韧带重建中的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 21;18(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03613-y.
6
Comparative Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Full Tibial Tunnel: Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Quadrupled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw and Staple Fixation.全胫骨隧道前交叉韧带重建的比较结果:四股半腱肌悬吊股骨和胫骨固定与四股半腱肌和股薄肌悬吊股骨和胫骨螺钉及U形钉固定的比较
J Knee Surg. 2023 Aug;36(10):1069-1076. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749396. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
7
Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.经关节(transportal)与全内(all-inside)技术在前交叉韧带重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 23;16(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02872-x.
8
Similar outcomes and satisfaction after transtibial versus transportal femoral drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adult recreational athletes.经胫骨隧道与经股骨髓道钻孔在前交叉韧带重建术治疗青年业余运动员中的相似疗效和满意度。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Apr;30(4):1197-1203. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06393-8. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
9
All-inside technique in ACL reconstruction: mid-term clinical outcomes and comparison with AM technique (Hamstrings and BpTB grafts).全内技术在 ACL 重建中的应用:中期临床结果与 AM 技术(腘绳肌和 BPTB 移植物)的比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Apr;31(3):465-472. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02798-w. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
10
ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation.ACL 重建中采用可调节长度环皮质纽扣固定法可减少胫骨隧道扩宽,与干扰螺钉固定法相比。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1036-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05642-9. Epub 2019 Aug 1.