Salusest Simona, Salvi Silvia, Totaro Aprile Federica, Rubini Ada, Stollagli Francesca, Buongiorno Silvia, Rullo Roberta, Preziosi Jessica, Anderson Gloria, Danza Michelangela, Lanzone Antonio
UOC di Ostetricia e Patologia Ostetrica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli', IRCCS, Roma, Italia.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia.
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Nov 1;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/192698. eCollection 2024.
Vaginal delivery can cause genital tract trauma and lacerations of different severity. This study aims to establish if routinary use of Ritgen's maneuver decreases the prevalence and severity of perineal lacerations compared to the traditional manual perineal protection (MPP).
This prospective case-control study was conducted in the labor ward of Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy. One hundred sixteen women who met inclusion criteria were included. The study group (n=58) consisted of women who were assisted using the Ritgen maneuver, whereas the women who gave birth immediately afterward were selected as the control group (n=58). All information was retrieved through electronic medical records.
In all, 22% women of the study group reported no perineal lacerations compared with 5% of the control group (p=0.007). Regarding the degree of lacerations, the study group exhibited more first-degree lacerations and fewer second-degree lacerations, while the control group exhibited the opposite trend. Among women who received epidural analgesia, 24% of the study group did not experience perineal lacerations, compared to 4.5% of the control (OR=0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.72; p=0.008). Similarly, 23.4% of cases in the study group with oxytocin-enhanced labor, experienced no perineal trauma while none in the control group had no perineal trauma in cases of oxytocin augmentation (p=0.005).
Our results suggest that using Ritgen's maneuver in childbirth care may reduce the incidence and severity of perineal lacerations, even in the presence of known risk factors for perineal lacerations such as oxytocin augmentation and epidural analgesia.
阴道分娩可导致不同严重程度的生殖道创伤和撕裂伤。本研究旨在确定与传统的手法会阴保护(MPP)相比,常规使用里特根手法是否能降低会阴撕裂伤的发生率和严重程度。
本前瞻性病例对照研究在意大利罗马的A. 杰梅利综合医院基金会的产房进行。纳入了116名符合纳入标准的女性。研究组(n = 58)由使用里特根手法辅助分娩的女性组成,而随后立即分娩的女性被选为对照组(n = 58)。所有信息均通过电子病历获取。
总体而言,研究组22%的女性报告无会阴撕裂伤,而对照组为5%(p = 0.007)。关于撕裂伤程度,研究组一度撕裂伤较多,二度撕裂伤较少,而对照组则呈现相反趋势。在接受硬膜外镇痛的女性中,研究组24%未发生会阴撕裂伤,而对照组为4.5%(OR = 0.15;95% CI:0.03 - 0.72;p = 0.008)。同样,在缩宫素加强产程的研究组病例中,23.4%未发生会阴创伤,而在缩宫素加强产程的对照组病例中无人未发生会阴创伤(p = 0.005)。
我们的结果表明,在分娩护理中使用里特根手法可能会降低会阴撕裂伤的发生率和严重程度,即使存在会阴撕裂伤的已知危险因素,如缩宫素加强产程和硬膜外镇痛。