• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进化枝密度是否限制地理分布范围的演变?

Does Clade Density Constrain Geographical Range Evolution?

作者信息

Pie Marcio R, Divieso Raquel, Caron Fernanda S

机构信息

Biology Department Edge Hill University Ormskirk Lancashire UK.

Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Real Jardín Botánico - CSIC Madrid Spain.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 31;14(11):e70438. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70438. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.70438
PMID:39493611
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525068/
Abstract

The role of biotic interactions, such as interspecific competition, in driving geographical range evolution is still poorly understood. For instance, lineages distributed across regions with a large number of potential competitors might experience some level of geographical packing of their range limits, so that changes in their geographical distributions are hampered. Conversely, a large number of competitors could instead lead to accelerated rates of geographical range evolution, with lineages shifting their ranges to avoid competition. We recently introduced the concept of clade density (CD; the sum of the areas of overlap between a species and other members of its higher taxon, weighted by their phylogenetic distance) as a proxy of the potential for interspecific competition across the geographical distribution of a given species. In this study, we used a large dataset with 5936 terrestrial vertebrate species to test whether CD is significantly associated with variation in the rate of geographical range evolution using two alternative approaches. First, we tested if there is a significant relationship between CD and the geographical distance between sister species. In addition, we estimated tip rates of geographical range evolution and tested if they were consistently associated with variation in CD. We found no evidence for an effect of CD on geographical range evolution in either of the tested approaches, even after accounting for phylogenetic uncertainty. These results are inconsistent with equilibrial models of species diversification and suggest that interspecific competition might not play a pervasive role in geographical range evolution of terrestrial vertebrates.

摘要

生物相互作用,如种间竞争,在推动地理分布范围演化中所起的作用仍未得到充分理解。例如,分布在有大量潜在竞争者区域的谱系可能会在一定程度上经历其分布范围界限的地理压缩,从而阻碍其地理分布的变化。相反,大量的竞争者反而可能导致地理分布范围演化速度加快,谱系会转移其分布范围以避免竞争。我们最近引入了分支密度(CD;一个物种与其高级分类单元的其他成员之间重叠区域的面积总和,按它们的系统发育距离加权)的概念,作为给定物种地理分布范围内种间竞争潜力的一个指标。在这项研究中,我们使用了一个包含5936种陆生脊椎动物的大型数据集,通过两种替代方法来测试CD是否与地理分布范围演化速率的变化显著相关。首先,我们测试了CD与姊妹物种之间的地理距离是否存在显著关系。此外,我们估计了地理分布范围演化的末端速率,并测试它们是否始终与CD的变化相关。即使在考虑了系统发育的不确定性之后,我们在任何一种测试方法中都没有发现CD对地理分布范围演化有影响的证据。这些结果与物种多样化的平衡模型不一致,并表明种间竞争可能在陆生脊椎动物的地理分布范围演化中并不普遍起作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/e9af0e270615/ECE3-14-e70438-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/dce216f212f3/ECE3-14-e70438-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/2a14abf23b09/ECE3-14-e70438-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/21cab5515310/ECE3-14-e70438-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/e9af0e270615/ECE3-14-e70438-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/dce216f212f3/ECE3-14-e70438-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/2a14abf23b09/ECE3-14-e70438-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/21cab5515310/ECE3-14-e70438-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0396/11525068/e9af0e270615/ECE3-14-e70438-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Clade Density Constrain Geographical Range Evolution?进化枝密度是否限制地理分布范围的演变?
Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 31;14(11):e70438. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70438. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Clade density and the evolution of diversity-dependent diversification.支系密度与多样性依赖的多样化进化。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 29;14(1):4576. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39629-5.
3
The Influence of the Interaction between Climate and Competition on the Distributional Limits of European Shrews.气候与竞争之间的相互作用对欧洲鼩鼱分布界限的影响
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;12(1):57. doi: 10.3390/ani12010057.
4
Speciation and diversity on tropical rocky shores: a global phylogeny of snails of the genus Echinolittorina.热带岩石海岸的物种形成与多样性:棘滨螺属蜗牛的全球系统发育研究
Evolution. 2004 Oct;58(10):2227-51. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01600.x.
5
Phylogenetic analyses suggest that diversification and body size evolution are independent in insects.系统发育分析表明,昆虫的多样化和体型进化是独立的。
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jan 8;16:8. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0570-3.
6
Testing the role of interspecific competition in the evolutionary origin of elevational zonation: an example with Buarremon brush-finches (Aves, Emberizidae) in the neotropical mountains.检验种间竞争在海拔地带性进化起源中的作用:以新热带山区的布氏灌雀(雀形目,鹀科)为例
Evolution. 2007 May;61(5):1120-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00095.x.
7
Widespread correlations between climatic niche evolution and species diversification in birds.鸟类气候生态位演化与物种多样化之间的广泛关联。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jul;85(4):869-78. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12530. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
The checkered history of checkerboard distributions.棋盘式分布的曲折历史。
Ecology. 2013 Nov;94(11):2403-14. doi: 10.1890/12-1471.1.
9
Evolution of geographical place and niche space: Patterns of diversification in the North American sedge (Cyperaceae) flora.地理分布与生态位空间的演变:北美莎草科植物区系的多样化模式
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Feb;95:183-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.09.028. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Geographic range size, life history and rates of diversification in Australian mammals.澳大利亚哺乳动物的地理分布范围大小、生活史与多样化速率
J Evol Biol. 2003 Mar;16(2):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00513.x.

本文引用的文献

1
phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things).phytools 2.0:一个更新的用于系统发育比较方法(和其他内容)的 R 生态系统。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 5;12:e16505. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16505. eCollection 2024.
2
Clade density and the evolution of diversity-dependent diversification.支系密度与多样性依赖的多样化进化。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 29;14(1):4576. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39629-5.
3
The Influence of the Interaction between Climate and Competition on the Distributional Limits of European Shrews.
气候与竞争之间的相互作用对欧洲鼩鼱分布界限的影响
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;12(1):57. doi: 10.3390/ani12010057.
4
Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation.推断哺乳动物树:用于生态学、进化和保护问题的物种级系统发育集合。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Dec 4;17(12):e3000494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494. eCollection 2019 Dec.
5
Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.植物群落中的竞争与共存:种内竞争比种间竞争更强。
Ecol Lett. 2018 Sep;21(9):1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/ele.13098. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
6
Species coexistence: macroevolutionary relationships and the contingency of historical interactions.物种共存:宏观进化关系与历史相互作用的偶然性
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Mar 30;283(1827):20160047. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0047.
7
Species diversity is dynamic and unbounded at local and continental scales.物种多样性在局部和大陆尺度上是动态且无边界的。
Am Nat. 2015 May;185(5):584-93. doi: 10.1086/680859. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Why does diversification slow down?为什么多元化会放缓?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Apr;29(4):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
9
Species interactions constrain geographic range expansion over evolutionary time.物种相互作用制约着进化时间内的地理分布范围扩张。
Ecol Lett. 2013 Mar;16(3):330-8. doi: 10.1111/ele.12043. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
10
Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion.系统发育限制相似性和竞争排斥。
Ecol Lett. 2011 Aug;14(8):782-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01644.x. Epub 2011 Jun 14.