Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Neurology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 18;15:1425027. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1425027. eCollection 2024.
Few prospective studies explored the incidence and determinant of carotid atherosclerosis (CA) progression (CAP). This community-based prospective study focused on the effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) treatments and glucose levels on CAP risks.
We followed up a group of 657 CA-positive middle-aged adults and elders for CAP. CAP was defined as an increase in the total number of carotid plaque and/or an increase in diameter stenosis by at least 10%.
After 4.05 years of followed-up, CAP was detected in 364 (55.4%) subjects. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.805 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.374-2.358) and 0.694 (95% CI: 0.510-0.944) for elevated fasting plasma glucose (eFPG; FPG≥100 mg/dL) and glucose-lowering medications (GLM), respectively. As compared to GLM-negative+eFPG-positive subjects, the multivariable-adjusted HRs were 0.497 (95% CI: 0.373-0.662), 0.537(95% CI: 0.306-0.942), and 0.586 (95% CI: 0.412-0.833) for GLM-negative+eFPG-negative, GLM-positive+eFPG-negative, and GLM-positive+ eFPG-positive subjects, respectively. The multivariable-adjusted risks of CAP were similar between GLM-negative+eFPG-negative and GLM-positive+ eFPG-positive subjects (p=0.77). Stratified analyses showed that the multivariable-adjusted HRs per 5.0 mg/dL increase in FPG were significantly increased among GLM-negative subjects (HR=1.131; 95% CI: 1.094-1.171) and non-significantly decreased among GLM-positive subjects (HR=0.985; 95% CI: 0.957-1.013).
We found that more than 50% of CA-positive subjects had CAP in 4 years and higher FPG significantly increased and GLM significantly decreased the risks of CAP. Additionally, GLM and FPG demonstrated an interactive effect on CAP risks. It seems possible that GLM may induce effects beyond lowering glucose levels and subsequently lowers CAP risks.
很少有前瞻性研究探讨颈动脉粥样硬化(CA)进展(CAP)的发生率和决定因素。这项基于社区的前瞻性研究重点关注糖尿病(DM)治疗和血糖水平对 CAP 风险的影响。
我们对一组 657 名 CA 阳性的中年和老年人进行了 CAP 的随访。CAP 定义为颈动脉斑块总数增加和/或直径狭窄增加至少 10%。
在 4.05 年的随访中,364 名(55.4%)受试者检测到 CAP。多变量调整后的风险比(HR)分别为 1.805(95%置信区间[CI]:1.374-2.358)和 0.694(95%CI:0.510-0.944),用于升高的空腹血糖(eFPG;FPG≥100mg/dL)和降糖药物(GLM)。与 GLM 阴性+eFPG 阳性受试者相比,多变量调整后的 HR 分别为 0.497(95%CI:0.373-0.662)、0.537(95%CI:0.306-0.942)和 0.586(95%CI:0.412-0.833),用于 GLM 阴性+eFPG 阴性、GLM 阳性+eFPG 阴性和 GLM 阳性+eFPG 阳性受试者。GLM 阴性+eFPG 阴性和 GLM 阳性+eFPG 阳性受试者之间 CAP 的多变量调整风险相似(p=0.77)。分层分析显示,FPG 每增加 5.0mg/dL,GLM 阴性受试者的多变量调整 HR 显著增加(HR=1.131;95%CI:1.094-1.171),GLM 阳性受试者的多变量调整 HR 无显著降低(HR=0.985;95%CI:0.957-1.013)。
我们发现,超过 50%的 CA 阳性受试者在 4 年内发生 CAP,较高的 FPG 显著增加,GLM 显著降低 CAP 风险。此外,GLM 和 FPG 对 CAP 风险表现出交互作用。GLM 可能通过降低血糖水平以外的作用来降低 CAP 风险,这似乎是有可能的。