Uyheng Joshua, Montiel Cristina Jayme, Sibayan Enrikko
Department of Psychology, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines.
Department of Political Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12820. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12820. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
In this paper, we posit that the 'global' status of the pandemic is not an essentialized feature of the crisis, but a product of social construction by political leaders. More specifically, we examine how political leaders of a superpower and a peripheral nation produce the pandemic's globality through crisis geographies from above and below. Utilizing a mixed methods framework, we analyse public speeches by Donald Trump of the United States and Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines through a critical approach to text analytics. Quantitatively, we found that besides mentioning their own homelands, Western countries featured more prominently in Trump's speeches while Asian neighbours were more salient in Duterte's speeches during the pandemic. However, the United States and China were consistently the most central in the crisis geographies of the pandemic of both speakers. Qualitatively, we further characterized the discourses surrounding these global pronouncements as: (a) collective reflexive positioning on the world stage, (b) charting zones of hope and (c) scapegoating zones of blame. Taken together, implications of this work are discussed in terms of understanding pandemic leadership in national and international contexts, recognizing its negotiated embeddedness in global structural hierarchies and enhancing critical approaches to geopolitical psychology.
在本文中,我们认为疫情的“全球”状态并非这场危机的本质特征,而是政治领导人社会建构的产物。更具体地说,我们考察了一个超级大国和一个边缘国家的政治领导人如何通过自上而下和自下而上的危机地缘政治来塑造疫情的全球性。利用混合方法框架,我们通过批判性文本分析方法,分析了美国的唐纳德·特朗普和菲律宾的罗德里戈·杜特尔特的公开演讲。在定量分析方面,我们发现,除了提及各自的祖国,在疫情期间,西方国家在特朗普的演讲中出现得更为频繁,而亚洲邻国在杜特尔特的演讲中更为突出。然而,在两位演讲者关于疫情的危机地缘政治中,美国和中国始终处于最核心的位置。在定性分析方面,我们进一步将围绕这些全球声明的话语特征概括为:(a)在世界舞台上的集体反思性定位,(b)描绘希望区域,以及(c)指责替罪羊区域。综上所述,本文从理解国家和国际背景下的疫情领导力、认识其在全球结构等级制度中的协商性嵌入以及加强地缘政治心理学的批判性方法等方面,对这项研究的意义进行了讨论。