Lasco Gideon
Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Anthropology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
Glob Public Health. 2025 Dec;20(1):2497920. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2025.2497920. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
With lives, livelihoods, and entire societies at stake, immunisation was as a matter of immense political and social importance throughout the global health crisis. Using the framework of medical populism, this paper articulates the emergence of vaccines for COVID-19 as a populist trope by using three countries with diverse contexts and distinct vaccine responses - Brazil, the Philippines, and the United States - as case studies, drawing on the discourses and actions of their heads of states from March 2020 to December 2021. In the Philippines, President Rodrigo Duterte engaged in 'vaccine messianism', offering the promise of future vaccines as a simplistic solution to the pandemic. In the US, President Donald Trump dramatised his vaccine project and tied it to his 'America First' politics in what has been called 'vaccine nationalism'. Meanwhile, in Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro's 'vaccine skepticism' helped forge divisions between his constituencies and global elites as well as political opponents. Overall, the case studies show how medical populist performances evolved during the pandemic, and how the use of vaccine as a populist trope was linked to immunological, and often exclusionary, notions of nationalism.
在生命、生计以及整个社会都受到威胁的情况下,在全球卫生危机期间,免疫接种具有极其重大的政治和社会意义。本文运用医学民粹主义框架,以巴西、菲律宾和美国这三个背景各异、疫苗应对措施不同的国家为案例研究,通过研究2020年3月至2021年12月期间三国国家元首的言论和行动,阐明了新冠疫苗如何成为一种民粹主义话语。在菲律宾,罗德里戈·杜特尔特总统表现出“疫苗救世主情结”,将未来疫苗的承诺作为应对疫情的简单解决方案。在美国,唐纳德·特朗普总统将他的疫苗项目戏剧化,并将其与他的“美国优先”政治联系起来,这被称为“疫苗民族主义”。与此同时,在巴西,雅伊尔·博索纳罗的“疫苗怀疑论”加剧了他的支持者与全球精英以及政治对手之间的分歧。总体而言,这些案例研究展示了疫情期间医学民粹主义表现是如何演变的,以及将疫苗用作民粹主义话语是如何与免疫学以及往往具有排他性的民族主义观念联系在一起的。