Suppr超能文献

设计涉及健康技术评估的合作:2024 年健康技术评估国际全球政策论坛的讨论和建议。

Designing collaborations involving health technology assessment: discussions and recommendations from the 2024 health technology assessment international global policy forum.

机构信息

Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi), Edmonton, AL, Canada.

Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 4;40(1):e41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000436.

Abstract

Although collaboration is an intensive way of working together, it is essential for such efforts to achieve shared goals. Health technology assessment (HTA) is transdisciplinary and has an important history of collaboration, with collaboration featuring increasingly in the strategic plans of HTA bodies and stakeholders. Collaboration can be between HTA bodies and between HTA bodies and other stakeholders-most notably regulators but increasingly payers, patient and caregiver organizations, clinicians-clinical societies, and academia. The 2024 HTAi Global Policy Forum (GPF) discussed collaborations involving HTA bodies, reviewing existing and previous collaborations to see what has worked and what can be learned. Core discussion themes included: (i) determining the collaboration purpose is essential but may be dynamic, changing over time; (ii) choosing the collaboration topic takes time, requiring upfront investment and stakeholder mapping; (iii) inviting the right participants and treating them equally is important, including those who can impact HTA, those who will be impacted by HTA and those who bring new information; (iv) collaborations need clear governance, defined roles, responsibilities, metrics, and case study-pilots can be a useful operational model; (v) resourcing collaborations sustainably is a challenge-the time, people, and money required are often under-estimated; (vi) undertaking continual, iterative learning reviews ensures ongoing value and impact of collaborations. Recommendations for future work include the development of a "go/no-go" checklist to determine when collaboration is needed, supplemented with a set of "best practice" principles for establishing and working in collaborations involving HTA bodies.

摘要

虽然合作是一种密集的合作方式,但对于实现共同目标来说,合作是必不可少的。健康技术评估(HTA)是跨学科的,具有重要的合作历史,合作越来越多地出现在 HTA 机构和利益相关者的战略计划中。合作可以在 HTA 机构之间进行,也可以在 HTA 机构和其他利益相关者之间进行——最著名的是监管机构,但越来越多的是支付者、患者和护理人员组织、临床医生——临床学会和学术界。2024 年 HTAi 全球政策论坛(GPF)讨论了涉及 HTA 机构的合作,回顾了现有的和以前的合作,以了解哪些合作有效,以及可以从中吸取哪些经验。核心讨论主题包括:(i)确定合作目的至关重要,但可能是动态的,随着时间的推移而变化;(ii)选择合作主题需要时间,需要前期投资和利益相关者映射;(iii)邀请合适的参与者并平等对待他们很重要,包括那些能够影响 HTA 的人、那些将受到 HTA 影响的人和那些带来新信息的人;(iv)合作需要明确的治理,定义角色、责任、指标和案例研究——试点可以是一种有用的运营模式;(v)可持续地为合作提供资源是一个挑战——所需的时间、人员和资金往往被低估;(vi)进行持续的、迭代的学习审查确保了合作的持续价值和影响。未来工作的建议包括制定一个“行/不行”检查表,以确定何时需要合作,并辅以一套“最佳实践”原则,用于建立和参与涉及 HTA 机构的合作。

相似文献

5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN LATIN AMERICA.利益相关方参与拉丁美洲的卫生技术评估过程。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(3):248-253. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000302. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

4
Global collaboration for health: rhetoric versus reality.全球卫生合作:言辞与现实
Lancet. 2020 Sep 12;396(10253):735. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31900-0.
5
The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration.新的健康技术评估定义:国际合作的里程碑。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):187-190. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000215. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
Defining and evaluating transdisciplinary research: implications for aging and technology.界定与评估跨学科研究:对老龄化与技术的启示
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Aug;14(6):533-542. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1496361. Epub 2018 Oct 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验