• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性创伤性脑损伤新型分类系统及预后模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性研究

Development and Validation of a Novel Classification System and Prognostic Model for Open Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Chen Yuhui, Chen Li, Xian Liang, Liu Haibing, Wang Jiaxing, Xia Shaohuai, Wei Liangfeng, Xia Xuewei, Wang Shousen

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Fujian Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurovascular Diseases, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Neurol Ther. 2025 Feb;14(1):157-175. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00678-7. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1007/s40120-024-00678-7
PMID:39495370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11762055/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Open traumatic brain injury (OTBI) is associated with high mortality and morbidity; however, the classification of these injuries and the determination of patient prognosis remain uncertain, hindering the selection of optimal treatment strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel OTBI classification system and a prognostic model for poor prognosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with isolated OTBI who received treatment at three large medical centers in China between January 2020 and June 2022 as the training set. Data on patients with OTBI collected at the Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University between July 2022 and June 2023 were used as the validation set. Clinical parameters, including clinical data at admission, radiological and laboratory findings, details of surgical methods, and prognosis were collected. Prognosis was assessed through a dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). A novel OTBI classification was proposed, categorizing patients based on a combination of intracranial hematoma and midline shift observed on imaging, and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with poor prognosis and to investigate the association between the novel OTBI classification and prognosis. Finally, a nomogram suitable for clinical application was established and validated.

RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified OTBI classification type C (p < 0.001), a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) ≤ 8 (p < 0.001), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (p = 0.004), subdural hematoma (SDH) (p = 0.011), and coagulopathy (p = 0.020) as independent risk factors for poor prognosis. The addition of the OTBI classification to a model containing all the other identified prognostic factors improved the predictive ability of the model (Z = 1.983; p = 0.047). In the validation set, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.917 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.864-0.970]. The calibration curve closely approximated the ideal curve, indicating strong predictive performance of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of our proposed OTBI classification system and its use alongside the other prognostic factors identified here may improve the prediction of patient prognosis and aid in the selection of the most suitable treatment strategies.

摘要

引言

开放性颅脑损伤(OTBI)与高死亡率和高发病率相关;然而,这些损伤的分类以及患者预后的判定仍不明确,这阻碍了最佳治疗策略的选择。本研究旨在开发并验证一种新型的OTBI分类系统以及一个针对不良预后的预测模型。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年1月至2022年6月在中国三家大型医疗中心接受治疗的孤立性OTBI患者作为训练集。将2022年7月至2023年6月在福建医科大学附属第一临床医学院收集的OTBI患者数据用作验证集。收集临床参数,包括入院时的临床数据、影像学和实验室检查结果、手术方法细节以及预后情况。通过二分格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评估预后。提出了一种新型的OTBI分类方法,根据影像学上观察到的颅内血肿和中线移位的组合对患者进行分类,并进行逻辑回归分析以确定与不良预后相关的危险因素,并研究新型OTBI分类与预后之间的关联。最后,建立并验证了一个适用于临床应用的列线图。

结果

多变量逻辑回归分析确定OTBI分类C型(p < 0.001)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(GCS)≤8(p < 0.001)、蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)(p = 0.004)、硬膜下血肿(SDH)(p = 0.011)和凝血病(p = 0.020)为不良预后的独立危险因素。将OTBI分类添加到包含所有其他已确定的预后因素的模型中可提高模型的预测能力(Z = 1.983;p = 0.047)。在验证集中,该模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.917 [95%置信区间(CI)= 0.864 - 0.970]。校准曲线与理想曲线密切近似,表明该模型具有强大的预测性能。

结论

实施我们提出的OTBI分类系统并将其与本文确定的其他预后因素一起使用,可能会改善对患者预后的预测,并有助于选择最合适的治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/c6d1412f7324/40120_2024_678_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/0f0f8186b9d6/40120_2024_678_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/0c7ec9829080/40120_2024_678_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/dd139d961719/40120_2024_678_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/5a1e04a1b044/40120_2024_678_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/e36aacdeec32/40120_2024_678_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/9aa4af754416/40120_2024_678_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/c6d1412f7324/40120_2024_678_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/0f0f8186b9d6/40120_2024_678_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/0c7ec9829080/40120_2024_678_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/dd139d961719/40120_2024_678_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/5a1e04a1b044/40120_2024_678_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/e36aacdeec32/40120_2024_678_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/9aa4af754416/40120_2024_678_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780a/11762055/c6d1412f7324/40120_2024_678_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Novel Classification System and Prognostic Model for Open Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.开放性创伤性脑损伤新型分类系统及预后模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性研究
Neurol Ther. 2025 Feb;14(1):157-175. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00678-7. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
The role of coagulopathy and subdural hematoma thickness at admission in predicting the prognoses of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter retrospective cohort study from China.凝血功能障碍和入院时硬膜下血肿厚度在预测中国严重创伤性脑损伤患者预后中的作用:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 1;110(9):5545-5562. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001650.
3
Prognostic Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Diffuse Axonal Injuries: Analysis of Outcomes and Review of Literature.磁共振成像在检测弥漫性轴索损伤中的预后意义:结果分析及文献复习。
Neurol India. 2022 Nov-Dec;70(6):2371-2377. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.364066.
4
Systemic immune inflammation index and peripheral blood carbon dioxide concentration at admission predict poor prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.入院时的全身免疫炎症指数和外周血二氧化碳浓度可预测严重创伤性脑损伤患者的预后不良。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1034916. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1034916. eCollection 2022.
5
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Graphical presentation of probabilities.简化创伤性脑损伤预后信息的使用。第 2 部分:概率的图形表示。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1621-1634. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172782. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
6
Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.严重颅脑损伤病例早期死亡率预后评分的验证
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121(6):1314-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131874. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
Subdural hematoma as a major determinant of short-term outcomes in traumatic brain injury.硬膜下血肿是创伤性脑损伤短期预后的主要决定因素。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):236-249. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS16255. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
8
Evaluation of novel computerized tomography scoring systems in human traumatic brain injury: An observational, multicenter study.新型计算机断层扫描评分系统在人类创伤性脑损伤中的评估:一项观察性多中心研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 3;14(8):e1002368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002368. eCollection 2017 Aug.
9
Evaluation of the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils score for predicting inpatient mortality among patients with traumatic subdural hematoma at United States trauma centers.评估美国创伤中心创伤性硬脑膜下血肿患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表瞳孔评分对内伤住院患者死亡率的预测价值。
J Neurosurg. 2024 May 3;141(4):908-916. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.JNS232695. Print 2024 Oct 1.
10
Prognostic factors and clinical nomogram for in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤住院患者死亡率的预后因素和临床列线图。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;77:194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.12.037. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a nomogram-based risk prediction model for unfavorable outcomes in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study.基于列线图的小儿创伤性脑损伤不良结局风险预测模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
Front Pediatr. 2025 Apr 11;13:1578679. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1578679. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnitude of dural tear and its associated factors among patients with depressed skull fracture.颅骨凹陷性骨折患者硬脑膜撕裂的程度及其相关因素。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Nov 27;86(1):133-138. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001541. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Prognostic factors and clinical nomogram for in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤住院患者死亡率的预后因素和临床列线图。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;77:194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.12.037. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
3
Severe Pediatric Open Skull Fracture With Exposed Brain Matter: A Case Report.
伴有脑实质外露的小儿严重开放性颅骨骨折:一例报告
Cureus. 2023 Oct 5;15(10):e46521. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46521. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury.急性脑损伤后昏迷患者意识恢复的预测模型。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 8;17:1088666. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666. eCollection 2023.
5
Prognosis prediction in traumatic brain injury patients using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测创伤性脑损伤患者的预后。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28188-w.
6
A Machine Learning-Based Approach to Predict Prognosis and Length of Hospital Stay in Adults and Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: Retrospective Cohort Study.基于机器学习的方法预测成人和儿童创伤性脑损伤患者的预后和住院时间:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 9;24(12):e41819. doi: 10.2196/41819.
7
Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.创伤性脑损伤:预防、临床护理和研究方面的进展和挑战。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Nov;21(11):1004-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00309-X. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
8
Detecting traumatic brain injury-induced coagulopathy: What we are testing and what we are not.检测创伤性脑损伤诱导的凝血病:我们在测试什么,以及我们不在测试什么。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jan 1;94(1S Suppl 1):S50-S55. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003748. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
9
Efficacy and safety of fibrinogen administration in acute post-traumatic hypofibrinogenemia in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: A randomized clinical trial.急性创伤性低纤维蛋白原血症对孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jul;101:204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Surgery versus conservative treatment for traumatic acute subdural haematoma: a prospective, multicentre, observational, comparative effectiveness study.手术与保守治疗创伤性急性硬脑膜下血肿:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性、比较有效性研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jul;21(7):620-631. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00166-1. Epub 2022 May 5.