• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性脑损伤后昏迷患者意识恢复的预测模型。

A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury.

作者信息

Zhou Liang, Chen Yuanyi, Liu Ziyuan, You Jia, Chen Siming, Liu Ganzhi, Yu Yang, Wang Jian, Chen Xin

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 8;17:1088666. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666
PMID:36845443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9945265/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Predicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probability of consciousness recovery.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to establish a model using clinical and neuroelectrophysiological indicators to predict consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with acute brain injury admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2019 to May 2022, who underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) examinations within 28 days after coma onset, were collected. The prognosis was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months after coma onset. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was applied to select the most relevant predictors. We combined Glasgow coma scale (GCS), EEG, and absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz to develop a predictive model using binary logistic regression and then presented by a nomogram. The predictive efficiency of the model was evaluated with AUC and verified by calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the prediction model.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were enrolled for analysis, of which 60 had favorable prognosis (GOS ≥ 3). Five predictors, including GCS (OR = 13.400, < 0.001), absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz site (FzMMNA, OR = 1.855, = 0.038), EEG background activity (OR = 4.309, = 0.023), EEG reactivity (OR = 4.154, = 0.030), and sleep spindles (OR = 4.316, = 0.031), were selected in the model by LASSO and binary logistic regression analysis. This model showed favorable predictive power, with an AUC of 0.939 (95% CI: 0.899-0.979), and calibration. The threshold probability of net benefit was between 5% and 92% in the DCA.

CONCLUSION

This predictive model for consciousness recovery in patients with acute brain injury is based on a nomogram incorporating GCS, EEG background activity, EEG reactivity, sleep spindles, and FzMMNA, which can be conveniently obtained during hospitalization. It provides a basis for care givers to make subsequent medical decisions.

摘要

背景

预测急性脑损伤昏迷患者的意识恢复是一个重要问题。尽管在预后评估方法的研究方面已经做出了一些努力,但仍不清楚哪些因素可用于建立直接预测意识恢复概率的模型。

目的

我们旨在建立一个使用临床和神经电生理指标的模型,以预测急性脑损伤后昏迷患者的意识恢复情况。

方法

收集了2019年5月至2022年5月在中南大学湘雅医院神经外科重症监护病房收治的急性脑损伤患者的临床资料,这些患者在昏迷发作后28天内接受了脑电图(EEG)和听觉失匹配负波(MMN)检查。在昏迷发作后3个月通过格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评估预后。应用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归分析来选择最相关的预测因子。我们将格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、EEG和Fz点MMN的绝对波幅相结合,使用二元逻辑回归建立预测模型,然后通过列线图呈现。用AUC评估模型的预测效率,并通过校准曲线进行验证。采用决策曲线分析(DCA)评估预测模型的临床实用性。

结果

共纳入116例患者进行分析,其中60例预后良好(GOS≥3)。通过LASSO和二元逻辑回归分析,模型中选择了5个预测因子,包括GCS(OR = 13.400,P<0.001)、Fz点MMN的绝对波幅(FzMMNA,OR = 1.855,P = 0.038)、EEG背景活动(OR = 4.309,P = 0.023)、EEG反应性(OR = 4.154,P = 0.030)和睡眠纺锤波(OR = 4.316,P = 0.031)。该模型显示出良好的预测能力,AUC为0.939(95%CI:0.899 - 0.979),且具有校准性。在DCA中,净效益的阈值概率在5%至92%之间。

结论

这个用于急性脑损伤患者意识恢复的预测模型基于一个包含GCS、EEG背景活动、EEG反应性、睡眠纺锤波和FzMMNA的列线图,这些指标在住院期间可方便地获得。它为护理人员做出后续医疗决策提供了依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/70ed7f43c87f/fnins-17-1088666-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/e937c2a426aa/fnins-17-1088666-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/74af29be9b29/fnins-17-1088666-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/4bbaf5e9436d/fnins-17-1088666-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/fe53dd492fec/fnins-17-1088666-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/43dc931fec7b/fnins-17-1088666-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/da226d8c0418/fnins-17-1088666-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/70ed7f43c87f/fnins-17-1088666-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/e937c2a426aa/fnins-17-1088666-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/74af29be9b29/fnins-17-1088666-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/4bbaf5e9436d/fnins-17-1088666-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/fe53dd492fec/fnins-17-1088666-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/43dc931fec7b/fnins-17-1088666-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/da226d8c0418/fnins-17-1088666-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963f/9945265/70ed7f43c87f/fnins-17-1088666-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury.急性脑损伤后昏迷患者意识恢复的预测模型。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 8;17:1088666. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666. eCollection 2023.
2
[Predictive value of mismatch negativity and P3a combined with electroencephalogram reactivity for the prognosis of comatose patients after severe brain injury].[失匹配负波和P3a联合脑电图反应性对重型颅脑损伤昏迷患者预后的预测价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 9;102(29):2265-2271. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220413-00799.
3
Clinical significance of mismatch negativity in predicting the awakening of comatose patients after severe brain injury.重度脑损伤后昏迷患者觉醒时错配负波的临床意义。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul 1;126(1):140-147. doi: 10.1152/jn.00658.2020. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
Assessment of electroencephalography and event-related potentials in unresponsive patients with brain injury.脑损伤无反应患者的脑电图和事件相关电位评估。
Neurophysiol Clin. 2022 Oct;52(5):384-393. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
[Predicting the prognosis for severe brain injury patients: short-latency somatosensory evoked potential combined with electroencephalogram reactivity].[预测重型颅脑损伤患者的预后:短潜伏期体感诱发电位联合脑电图反应性]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 13;100(37):2924-2928. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200217-00305.
6
Predictive value of EEG-awakening for behavioral awakening from coma.脑电图觉醒对昏迷行为觉醒的预测价值。
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0094-4. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
Nomogram to predict the risk of acute kidney injury in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: an analysis of the MIMIC-III database.预测糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者急性肾损伤风险的列线图:对 MIMIC-III 数据库的分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00696-8.
8
[Comparison of the accuracy of predicting poor outcome of coma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with two kinds of electroencephalogram techniques].[两种脑电图技术预测心肺复苏后昏迷不良预后的准确性比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):554-557. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.010.
9
A nomogram based on quantitative EEG to predict the prognosis of nontraumatic coma patients in the neuro-intensive care unit.基于定量脑电图的预测神经重症监护病房非创伤性昏迷患者预后的列线图。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Aug;83:103618. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103618. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
10
The Combination of N60 with Mismatch Negativity Improves the Prediction of Awakening from Coma.N60 与错配负波结合可提高昏迷患者觉醒预测的准确性。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Jun;36(3):727-737. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01308-y. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Novel Classification System and Prognostic Model for Open Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.开放性创伤性脑损伤新型分类系统及预后模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性研究
Neurol Ther. 2025 Feb;14(1):157-175. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00678-7. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤后意识障碍的Meta分析。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):290-303. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of electroencephalography and event-related potentials in unresponsive patients with brain injury.脑损伤无反应患者的脑电图和事件相关电位评估。
Neurophysiol Clin. 2022 Oct;52(5):384-393. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
2
Neurological Pupil Index for the Early Prediction of Outcome in Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients.用于早期预测重症急性脑损伤患者预后的神经瞳孔指数
Brain Sci. 2022 May 6;12(5):609. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050609.
3
Brain injury after cardiac arrest: pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis.
心脏骤停后脑损伤:病理生理学、治疗和预后。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Dec;47(12):1393-1414. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06548-2. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
4
Clinical significance of mismatch negativity in predicting the awakening of comatose patients after severe brain injury.重度脑损伤后昏迷患者觉醒时错配负波的临床意义。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul 1;126(1):140-147. doi: 10.1152/jn.00658.2020. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
Brain Multimodal Monitoring in Severe Acute Brain Injury: Is It Relevant to Patient Outcome and Mortality?严重急性脑损伤的脑多模态监测:与患者预后和死亡率相关吗?
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:83-86. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_18.
6
Role of Quantitative EEG and EEG Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury.定量脑电图和脑电图反应性在创伤性脑损伤中的作用。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2022 Sep;53(5):452-459. doi: 10.1177/1550059420984934. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Alpha coma in COVID encephalopathy.新冠脑病中的α昏迷
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan;132(1):202-203. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
8
Multicenter prospective study on predictors of short-term outcome in disorders of consciousness.多中心前瞻性研究意识障碍患者短期预后的预测因素。
Neurology. 2020 Sep 15;95(11):e1488-e1499. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010254. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
9
Combined Behavioral and Mismatch Negativity Evidence for the Effects of Long-Lasting High-Definition tDCS in Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot Study.联合行为学和失配负波证据表明长期高清经颅直流电刺激对意识障碍的影响:一项初步研究。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Apr 28;14:381. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00381. eCollection 2020.
10
Global, Regional and Country-Specific Burden of Ischaemic Stroke, Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家特定缺血性卒中、脑出血和蛛网膜下腔出血负担:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):171-179. doi: 10.1159/000506396. Epub 2020 Feb 20.