• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经前外侧入路行非骨水泥短柄全髋关节置换术后早期假体周围股骨骨折的骨盆和股骨髓腔形态学是否存在差异?

Is there a difference in pelvic and femoral morphology in early periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach?

机构信息

Department for Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020, Linz, Austria.

Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Strasse 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Nov 4;25(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00795-x.

DOI:10.1186/s10195-024-00795-x
PMID:39495408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11535139/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pelvic and femoral morphology are associated with the occurrence of early periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Differences exist depending on the performed approach and implanted stem design. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyze the pelvic and femoral morphology in cementless short stem THA via a minimally-invasive (MIS) anterolateral approach.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center, multi-surgeon, comparative propensity-score matched study of a cohort of 1826 short stem THAs was conducted. A total of 39 PFFs within the first 90 days after surgery was matched on a 2:1 ratio to non-fracture patients. The morphology of the proximal femur was analyzed with canal flare index (CFI), canal-calcar ratio (CCR), canal-bone ratio (CBR), morphological cortical index (MCI), and femoral cortical index (CI). The pelvic morphology was analyzed with ilium-ischial ratio (IR), distance anterior superior iliac spine to the tip of the greater trochanter (AGT). Both groups were analyzed regarding several parameters for femoral and pelvic morphology in non-parametric testing and univariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

A significantly higher AGT was detected in the fracture group (104.5 mm ± 18 versus 97.4 mm ± 9.8; p = 0.016). All other femoral and pelvic parameters did not differ between both groups, also when compared depending on the Vancouver type of the PFF.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphology of the proximal femur and the pelvis do not differ in several radiological parameters in patients sustaining a PFF in cementless short stem THA via an anterolateral approach compared with matched non-fracture group. The findings are controversial to other studies with different stem types and approaches. Future studies should focus on analyzing the influence of the pelvic geometry and the shape of the proximal femur in the occurrence of PFFs in different approaches with the same stem type and vice versa. Level of Evidence Level III case-controlled study.

摘要

背景

骨盆和股骨形态与非骨水泥全髋关节置换术(THA)中早期假体周围股骨骨折(PFF)的发生有关。根据所采用的入路和植入物设计,存在差异。因此,本研究旨在通过微创(MIS)前外侧入路分析非骨水泥短柄 THA 的骨盆和股骨形态。

方法

回顾性、单中心、多外科医生、比较倾向评分匹配研究了 1826 例短柄 THA 队列。在手术后 90 天内共发生 39 例 PFF,按照 2:1 的比例与非骨折患者相匹配。采用管腔扩张指数(CFI)、管腔-小粗隆比(CCR)、管腔-骨比(CBR)、形态皮质指数(MCI)和股骨皮质指数(CI)分析股骨近端形态。采用髂骨-坐骨比(IR)、坐骨上棘前缘至大转子尖端的距离(AGT)分析骨盆形态。对两组患者进行股骨和骨盆形态的几个参数进行非参数检验和单因素回归分析。

结果

骨折组的 AGT 明显较高(104.5 ± 18 毫米比 97.4 ± 9.8 毫米;p = 0.016)。两组患者在其他股骨和骨盆参数方面无差异,当根据 PFF 的温哥华分型进行比较时也是如此。

结论

与匹配的非骨折组相比,通过前外侧入路进行非骨水泥短柄 THA 的患者在发生 PFF 时,股骨近端和骨盆的几个影像学参数的形态没有差异。这些发现与其他具有不同柄类型和入路的研究结果相反。未来的研究应侧重于分析不同入路中骨盆几何形状和股骨近端形状对不同柄类型和反之亦然 PFF 发生的影响。

证据水平

III 级病例对照研究。

相似文献

1
Is there a difference in pelvic and femoral morphology in early periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach?经前外侧入路行非骨水泥短柄全髋关节置换术后早期假体周围股骨骨折的骨盆和股骨髓腔形态学是否存在差异?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Nov 4;25(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00795-x.
2
Periprosthetic femoral fractures in minimally-invasive anterolateral short stem versus transgluteal straight stem cementless total hip arthroplasty: What are the differences in the femoral and pelvic morphology?微创前外侧短柄与经臀直柄非骨水泥全髋关节置换术中的假体周围股骨骨折:股骨和骨盆形态有哪些差异?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05502-y.
3
Can We Predict Fracture When Using a Short Cementless Femoral Stem in the Anterior Approach?在采用前侧入路的非骨水泥股骨柄时,我们能否预测骨折?
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S901-S907. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.054. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
4
Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?股骨形态是否能预测非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折的风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S359-S363. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
5
Low rate of early periprosthetic fractures in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach.微创前外侧入路在非骨水泥短柄全髋关节置换术中早期周围骨折发生率低。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 May 21;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00583-x.
6
Femoral Component Undersizing and Alignment are Risk Factors for Early Periprosthetic Femur Fracture.股骨部件尺寸不足和对线不良是早期假体股骨骨折的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S604-S610. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.与一种独特的非骨水泥型股骨柄设计相关的假体周围股骨骨折风险增加。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2045-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4077-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
8
Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Oct;39(10):2547-2554. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
9
Does Femoral Stem Design Influence Periprosthetic Fracture Incidence and Morphology in Total Hip Arthroplasty?股骨柄设计会影响全髋关节置换术中假体周围骨折的发生率和形态吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Apr;40(4):1062-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.028. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
10
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Short Versus Straight Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.非骨水泥型短柄与直柄全髋关节置换术中假体周围股骨骨折:倾向评分匹配分析
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr;38(4):751-756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.027. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Do all anatomic stems perform equally at long-term survival? A regional registry-based study on 12,010 total hip arthroplasty implants according to stem length and neck modularity.所有解剖型股骨柄在长期生存率方面表现都一样吗?一项基于地区登记处的针对12010例全髋关节置换植入物的研究,该研究根据股骨柄长度和颈部模块化进行。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Feb 21;26(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00824-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Short Versus Straight Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.非骨水泥型短柄与直柄全髋关节置换术中假体周围股骨骨折:倾向评分匹配分析
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr;38(4):751-756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.027. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
2
Can We Predict Fracture When Using a Short Cementless Femoral Stem in the Anterior Approach?在采用前侧入路的非骨水泥股骨柄时,我们能否预测骨折?
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S901-S907. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.054. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
Risk factors for femoral fracture in lateral decubitus direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty using conventional stems: a retrospective analysis.
外侧卧位直接前方入路全髋关节置换术使用传统柄的股骨骨折的危险因素:回顾性分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 30;16(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02253-4.
4
Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?股骨形态是否能预测非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折的风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S359-S363. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
5
Predictors of Perioperative Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With the Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty.直接前入路全髋关节置换术相关围手术期温哥华 B 型股骨假体周围骨折的预测因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1407-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.009. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Fifty-six percent of proximal femoral cortical hypertrophies 6 to 10 years after Total hip arthroplasty with a short Cementless curved hip stem - a cause for concern?全髋关节置换术后 6-10 年,股骨近段皮质肥厚的发生率为 56%,使用短柄非骨水泥弯曲髋骨柄 - 令人担忧的原因?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 29;20(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2645-6.
7
Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study.髋关节置换术中单柄假体周围股骨骨折的发生率、分类及危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1400-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
8
John Charnley Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior and Miniposterior Approach THA: Which Provides Better Functional Recovery?约翰·查恩利奖:直接前路与微创后路全髋关节置换术的随机临床试验:哪种方法能带来更好的功能恢复?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):216-229. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000112.
9
Perioperative Fractures in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Minimally Invasive Approach: Reduced Risk With Short Stems.直接前微创入路在非骨水泥全髋关节置换术中的围手术期骨折:短柄可降低风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):548-554. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?人工关节周围股骨骨折及如何避免:股骨假体部件设计对人工关节周围股骨骨折风险增加有何影响?
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):50-59. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1.