Suppr超能文献

白内障合并高度近视患者植入区域折射性多焦点或衍射性双焦点人工晶状体后的视觉效果比较。

Comparison of visual outcomes in patients with cataracts and high myopia after implantation of a zonal refractive multifocal or diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.

机构信息

The Second Hospital in Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76020-w.

Abstract

This study compares the optical quality of zonal refractive multifocal and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and visual outcomes after implantation in 93 patients(93 eyes) with cataracts and high myopia. A retrospective analysis was conducted to measure visual acuity at far, intermediate, and near distances, defocus curves, wavefront aberrations, modulation transfer function (MTF), a Quality of Vision questionnaire (QoV) and visual quality self-evaluation were examined at 3 months. The results demonstrated the ZMB group showed better uncorrected near visual acuity (P < 0.01), and the MF15 group showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (P < 0.001). The ZMB group provided better MTF than the MF15 group (P < 0.01) but demonstrated a worse QoV score, especially for the severity of glare, halo, and starburst (P < 0.05). The satisfaction score and spectacle independence rate in the ZMB group were higher than in the MF15 group (P < 0.01). LS-313MF15 and TecnisZMB00 offered excellent visual restoration, stable distance visual acuity, and good subjective visual function.

摘要

这项研究比较了区域折射多焦点和衍射双焦点人工晶状体(IOL)在 93 名白内障和高度近视患者(93 只眼)中的光学质量和植入后的视觉效果。回顾性分析测量了远、中、近视力、离焦曲线、波前像差、调制传递函数(MTF),并在术后 3 个月时检查了视觉质量问卷(QoV)和视觉质量自评。结果表明,ZMB 组的未矫正近视力更好(P<0.01),MF15 组的未矫正中间视力更好(P<0.001)。ZMB 组的 MTF 优于 MF15 组(P<0.01),但 QoV 评分较差,尤其是在眩光、晕影和星爆方面(P<0.05)。ZMB 组的满意度评分和不依赖眼镜的比率高于 MF15 组(P<0.01)。LS-313MF15 和 TecnisZMB00 提供了出色的视觉恢复、稳定的远距离视力和良好的主观视觉功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/11535303/cde10e87b0a9/41598_2024_76020_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验