• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

白内障合并高度近视患者植入区域折射性多焦点或衍射性双焦点人工晶状体后的视觉效果比较。

Comparison of visual outcomes in patients with cataracts and high myopia after implantation of a zonal refractive multifocal or diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.

机构信息

The Second Hospital in Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76020-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-76020-w
PMID:39496667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11535303/
Abstract

This study compares the optical quality of zonal refractive multifocal and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and visual outcomes after implantation in 93 patients(93 eyes) with cataracts and high myopia. A retrospective analysis was conducted to measure visual acuity at far, intermediate, and near distances, defocus curves, wavefront aberrations, modulation transfer function (MTF), a Quality of Vision questionnaire (QoV) and visual quality self-evaluation were examined at 3 months. The results demonstrated the ZMB group showed better uncorrected near visual acuity (P < 0.01), and the MF15 group showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (P < 0.001). The ZMB group provided better MTF than the MF15 group (P < 0.01) but demonstrated a worse QoV score, especially for the severity of glare, halo, and starburst (P < 0.05). The satisfaction score and spectacle independence rate in the ZMB group were higher than in the MF15 group (P < 0.01). LS-313MF15 and TecnisZMB00 offered excellent visual restoration, stable distance visual acuity, and good subjective visual function.

摘要

这项研究比较了区域折射多焦点和衍射双焦点人工晶状体(IOL)在 93 名白内障和高度近视患者(93 只眼)中的光学质量和植入后的视觉效果。回顾性分析测量了远、中、近视力、离焦曲线、波前像差、调制传递函数(MTF),并在术后 3 个月时检查了视觉质量问卷(QoV)和视觉质量自评。结果表明,ZMB 组的未矫正近视力更好(P<0.01),MF15 组的未矫正中间视力更好(P<0.001)。ZMB 组的 MTF 优于 MF15 组(P<0.01),但 QoV 评分较差,尤其是在眩光、晕影和星爆方面(P<0.05)。ZMB 组的满意度评分和不依赖眼镜的比率高于 MF15 组(P<0.01)。LS-313MF15 和 TecnisZMB00 提供了出色的视觉恢复、稳定的远距离视力和良好的主观视觉功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/11535303/8121bd616695/41598_2024_76020_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/11535303/cde10e87b0a9/41598_2024_76020_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/11535303/6f9ce794b60a/41598_2024_76020_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/11535303/8121bd616695/41598_2024_76020_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/11535303/cde10e87b0a9/41598_2024_76020_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/11535303/6f9ce794b60a/41598_2024_76020_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/11535303/8121bd616695/41598_2024_76020_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of visual outcomes in patients with cataracts and high myopia after implantation of a zonal refractive multifocal or diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.白内障合并高度近视患者植入区域折射性多焦点或衍射性双焦点人工晶状体后的视觉效果比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76020-w.
2
Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: a prospective comparison.植入区域折射多焦点和扩展远视力人工晶状体后的视觉效果和光学质量:前瞻性比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Apr;46(4):540-548. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000088.
3
Comparison of the visual and intraocular optical performance of a refractive multifocal IOL with rotational asymmetry and an apodized diffractive multifocal IOL.比较具有旋转非对称性的折射多焦点人工晶状体和消色差衍射多焦点人工晶状体的视觉和眼内光学性能。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Feb;28(2):100-5. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120110-01. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
4
One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.新一代多焦点人工晶状体的一年期疗效
Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
5
Monovision with a Bifocal Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens in Presbyopic Patients: A Prospective, Observational Case Series.单眼视与双焦点衍射型多焦点人工晶状体在老视患者中的应用:一项前瞻性、观察性病例系列研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;212:105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.11.010. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
6
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.老花眼患者白内障摘除术后三焦点人工晶状体与双焦点人工晶状体的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 18;6(6):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub2.
7
Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: Monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision.四种人工晶状体的视觉效果比较分析:单焦点、多焦点和扩展视程。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Feb;44(2):156-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.011.
8
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes of diffractive bifocal toric and trifocal toric intraocular lenses 12 months after implantation in patients with moderate to high myopia.比较中高度近视患者植入衍射性双焦点散光型和三焦点散光型人工晶状体 12 个月后的视力和屈光结果。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;41(9):3029-3040. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01865-3. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Comparison of visual outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and a refractive bifocal intraocular lens in eyes with axial myopia: a prospective cohort study.轴性近视患者的衍射三焦点人工晶状体与折射双焦点人工晶状体视觉效果的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02626-1.
10
Comparison of Objective and Subjective Visual Outcomes Between Pentafocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses.五焦点与三焦点衍射型人工晶状体的客观与主观视觉效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2024 Sep;40(9):e604-e613. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240715-04. Epub 2024 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of visual performance between diffractive bifocal and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses.衍射型双焦点和衍射型三焦点人工晶状体的视觉性能比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 4;14(1):5292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55926-5.
2
Recommendation for Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Delphi Consensus Statement by the ESASO Study Group.推荐用于矫正老视的人工晶状体:ESASO 研究小组的德尔菲共识声明。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;253:169-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
Refraction and defocus curves in eyes with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.
单焦点和多焦点人工晶状体眼的折射和散焦曲线。
J Optom. 2023 Jul-Sep;16(3):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
4
[Selection of intraocular lenses in patients with cataract and high myopia].
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 11;59(2):86-89. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20220424-00211.
5
Tolerance to lens tilt and decentration of two multifocal intraocular lenses: using the quick contrast sensitivity function method.两种多焦点人工晶状体对晶状体倾斜和偏心的耐受性:使用快速对比敏感度函数法
Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Dec 1;9(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00317-y.
6
Comparative visual performance of diffractive bifocal and rotationally asymmetric refractive intraocular lenses.衍射型双焦点和旋转不对称性折射型人工晶状体的对比视觉性能。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 12;12(1):19394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24123-7.
7
Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with High Myopic Cataract after Implantation of AT LISA Tri 839MP and LS-313 MF30 Intraocular Lenses.AT LISA Tri 839MP和LS-313 MF30人工晶状体植入高度近视性白内障患者后的视觉效果及生活质量比较
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 28;2022:5645752. doi: 10.1155/2022/5645752. eCollection 2022.
8
Cataract surgery and intraocular lens placement in patients with Fuchs corneal dystrophy: a review of the current literature.《伴有 Fuchs 角膜营养不良的白内障手术和人工晶状体植入术:对当前文献的回顾》
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 1;33(1):21-27. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000816.
9
Visual Performance Following Bilateral Implantation of Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Bifocal Intraocular Lens (LS-313 MF30) or Apodized Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens (ReSTOR SN6AD1).双侧植入屈光旋转不对称双焦点人工晶状体(LS-313 MF30)或变迹衍射双焦点人工晶状体(ReSTOR SN6AD1)后的视觉性能
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Sep 1;17:917-926. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S325287. eCollection 2021.
10
Correlation between Contrast Sensitivity and Modulation Transfer Functions.
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Nov 1;98(11):1263-1269. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001795.