Suppr超能文献

小细胞肺癌寡转移疾病未来分期中M描述符的不同方法:一项横断面生存分析。

Different approach to M descriptor for future staging of oligometastatic disease in SCLC: A cross-sectional survival analysis.

作者信息

Uzel Şener Melahat, Akın Kabalak Pınar, Kavurgacı Suna, Yılmaz Demirci Nilgün, Kızılgöz Derya, Yanık Fazlı, Ermin Sinem, Söyler Yasemin, Karamustafaoğlu Yekta Altemur, Türkay Pakna Demet, Dumanlı Ahmet, Yılmaz Ülkü

机构信息

Department of Chest Diseases, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jun;27(6):2750-2760. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03778-w. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of oligometastasis and the M descriptor on survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC(ES-SCLC) from 2010 to 2020. Subgroups: Group 1: single metastasis in a single organ, Group 2: 2-5 metastases in a single organ, Group 3: 6 or more metastases in a single organ, and Group 4: metastases in two or more organs. This classification was based on the 9th Staging-M descriptor. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 439 patients was 62 ± 10 years, and 89.5% of them were male. The mean PFS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.9-12.5), 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6-9.4), 4.3 months (95% CI 2.9-5.7), and 5.4 months (95% CI 4.7-6.1), respectively. PFS in Group 2 was significantly higher. The mean OS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.2-15.3), 9.5 months (95% CI 7.1-11.9), 7.1 months (95% CI 4.5-9.7), and 6.9 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9), respectively. OS in Group 1 was significantly higher. OS and PFS in the M1b group were significantly higher than in the M1c1 and M1c2 groups (p < 0.05) with no statistical difference between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in survival between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups. In ES-SCLC, the number of metastases may be a more predictive factor for prognosis than the number of metastatic organs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨寡转移和M描述符对小细胞肺癌(SCLC)生存的影响。

方法

这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2020年新诊断的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者。亚组:第1组:单个器官单一转移;第2组:单个器官2 - 5个转移灶;第3组:单个器官6个或更多转移灶;第4组:两个或更多器官转移。该分类基于第九版分期-M描述符。进行了三年无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分析。

结果

439例患者的平均年龄为62±10岁,其中89.5%为男性。第1、2、3、4组的平均PFS分别为10.7个月(95%CI 8.9 - 12.5)、7.5个月(95%CI 5.6 - 9.4)、4.3个月(95%CI 2.9 - 5.7)和5.4个月(95%CI 4.7 - 6.1)。第2组的PFS显著更高。第1、2、3、4组的平均OS分别为13.3个月(95%CI 11.2 - 15.3)、9.5个月(95%CI 7.1 - 11.9)、7.1个月(95%CI 4.5 - 9.7)和6.9个月(95%CI 6.0 - 7.9)。第1组的OS显著更高。M1b组的OS和PFS显著高于M1c1和M1c2组(p<0.05),M1c1和M1c2组之间无统计学差异。

结论

M1c1和M1c2组在生存方面无显著差异。在ES-SCLC中,转移灶数量可能比转移器官数量更能预测预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验