Department of Medicine, Te Whatu Ora Hauora a Toi Bay of Plenty, Tauranga, New Zealand.
School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD011204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011204.pub3.
Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in dialysis patients and is strongly associated with fluid overload and hypertension. It is plausible that low dialysate sodium ion concentration [Na+] may decrease total body sodium content, thereby reducing fluid overload and hypertension and ultimately reducing CV morbidity and death. This is an update of a review first published in 2019.
This review evaluated the harms and benefits of using a low (< 138 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance haemodialysis (HD) patients.
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 1 October 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both parallel and cross-over, of low (< 138 mM) versus neutral (138 to 140 mM) or high (> 140 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance HD patients were included.
Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model, and results expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
We included 17 studies randomising 509 patients, with data available for 452 patients after dropouts. All but three studies evaluated a fixed concentration of low dialysate [Na+], with one using profiled dialysate [Na+] and two using individualised dialysate [Na+]. Five were parallel group studies, and 12 were cross-over studies. Of the latter, only six used a washout between intervention and control periods. Most studies were short-term with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 4 (4 to 16) weeks. Two were of a single HD session and two of a single week's HD. Seven studies were conducted prior to 2000, and six reported the use of obsolete HD practices. Other than for indirectness arising from older studies, risks of bias in the included studies were generally low. Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+] (≥ 138 mM), low dialysate [Na+] (< 138 mM) reduces interdialytic weight gain (14 studies, 515 participants: MD -0.36 kg, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.22; high certainty evidence) and antihypertensive medication use (5 studies, 241 participants: SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.1; high certainty evidence), and probably reduces left ventricular mass index (2 studies, 143 participants: MD -7.65 g/m, 95% CI -14.48 to -0.83; moderate certainty evidence), predialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP) (5 studies, 232 participants: MD -3.39 mm Hg, 95% CI -5.17 to -1.61; moderate certainty evidence), postdialysis MAP (5 studies, 226 participants: MD -3.17 mm Hg, 95% CI -4.68 to 1.67; moderate certainty evidence), predialysis serum [Na+] (11 studies, 435 participants: MD -1.26 mM, 95% CI -1.81 to -0.72; moderate certainty evidence) and postdialysis serum [Na+] (6 studies, 188 participants: MD -3.09 mM, 95% CI -4.29 to -1.88; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], low dialysate [Na+] probably increases intradialytic hypotension events (13 studies, 15,764 HD sessions: RR 1.58, 95% 1.25 to 2.01; moderate certainty evidence) and intradialytic cramps (10 studies, 14,559 HD sessions: RR 1.84, 95% 1.29 to 2.64; moderate certainty evidence). Effect size for important outcomes were generally greater with low dialysate [Na+] compared to high compared with neutral dialysate [Na+], although formal hypothesis testing identifies that the difference was only certain for postdialysis serum [Na+]. Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], it is uncertain whether low dialysate [Na+] affects intradialytic or interdialytic MAP, and dietary salt intake. It is also uncertain whether low dialysate [Na+] changed extracellular fluid status, venous tone, arterial vascular resistance, left ventricular volumes, or fatigue. Studies did not examine CV or all-cause death, CV events, or hospitalisation.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Low dialysate [Na+] reduces intradialytic weight gain and probably blood pressure, which are effects directionally associated with improved outcomes. However, the intervention probably increases intradialytic hypotension and probably reduces serum [Na+], effects that are associated with an increased risk of death. The effect of the intervention on overall patient health and well-being is unknown. Further evidence is needed in the form of longer-term studies in contemporary settings, evaluating end-organ effects in small-scale mechanistic studies using optimal methods, and clinical outcomes in large-scale multicentre RCTs.
心血管疾病是透析患者的主要死亡原因,与液体超负荷和高血压密切相关。低透析液钠离子浓度[Na+]可能会降低体内总钠含量,从而减少液体超负荷和高血压,最终降低心血管发病率和死亡率,这一理论似乎是合理的。这是一篇于 2019 年首次发表的综述的更新。
本综述评估了在维持性血液透析(HD)患者中使用低(<138mM)透析液[Na+]的危害和益处。
我们通过与信息专家联系,使用与本综述相关的检索词,检索了截至 2024 年 10 月 1 日的 Cochrane 肾脏病和移植组注册库中的研究。通过对 CENTRAL、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 的检索、会议论文集、国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)检索门户和 ClinicalTrials.gov 的检索,确定了注册库中的研究。
纳入了使用低(<138mM)与中性(138 至 140mM)或高(>140mM)透析液[Na+]的随机对照试验(RCT),比较用于维持性 HD 患者。
两名作者独立筛选研究纳入情况并提取数据。使用随机效应模型进行统计分析,结果以二分类结局的风险比(RR)表示,以连续结局的均值差异(MD)或标准化均数差(SMD)表示,置信区间(CI)为 95%。使用推荐、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)的等级来评估证据的可信度。
我们纳入了 17 项随机分配 509 名患者的研究,在排除了脱落的患者后,有 452 名患者的数据可供分析。除了三项研究评估了固定浓度的低透析液[Na+]外,其余研究均使用了 Profile 透析液[Na+]或个体化透析液[Na+]。其中,五项为平行组研究,十二项为交叉研究。后者中只有六项研究在干预和对照组之间使用了洗脱期。大多数研究的随访时间较短,中位数(四分位间距)为 4(4 至 16)周。其中两项研究为单次 HD 治疗,两项研究为单次 HD 治疗周。七项研究在 2000 年前进行,六项研究报告了过时的 HD 实践。除了由于较旧的研究而存在间接性外,纳入研究的偏倚风险通常较低。与中性或高透析液[Na+](≥138mM)相比,低透析液[Na+](<138mM)可减少透析间体重增加(14 项研究,515 名参与者:MD-0.36kg,95%CI-0.50 至-0.22;高确定性证据)和降压药物使用(5 项研究,241 名参与者:SMD-0.37,95%CI-0.64 至-0.1;高确定性证据),并可能降低左心室质量指数(2 项研究,143 名参与者:MD-7.65g/m,95%CI-14.48 至-0.83;中等确定性证据)、透析前平均动脉压(MAP)(5 项研究,232 名参与者:MD-3.39mmHg,95%CI-5.17 至-1.61;中等确定性证据)、透析后 MAP(5 项研究,226 名参与者:MD-3.17mmHg,95%CI-4.68 至 1.67;中等确定性证据)、透析前血清[Na+](11 项研究,435 名参与者:MD-1.26mM,95%CI-1.81 至-0.72;中等确定性证据)和透析后血清[Na+](6 项研究,188 名参与者:MD-3.09mM,95%CI-4.29 至-1.88;中等确定性证据)。与中性或高透析液[Na+]相比,低透析液[Na+]可能增加透析中低血压事件(13 项研究,15764 次 HD 治疗:RR 1.58,95%CI 1.25 至 2.01;中等确定性证据)和透析中痉挛(10 项研究,14559 次 HD 治疗:RR 1.84,95%CI 1.29 至 2.64;中等确定性证据)。对于重要结局,低透析液[Na+]的效应大小通常大于高透析液[Na+]与中性透析液[Na+],尽管正式的假设检验仅确定与透析后血清[Na+]相比,低透析液[Na+]与高透析液[Na+]的差异是肯定的。与中性或高透析液[Na+]相比,低透析液[Na+]对透析内或透析间 MAP 和饮食盐摄入量的影响不确定。也不确定低透析液[Na+]是否改变细胞外液状态、静脉张力、动脉血管阻力、左心室容积或疲劳。研究未检查 CV 或全因死亡、CV 事件或住院情况。
低透析液[Na+]可减少透析间体重增加和血压,这些效果与改善结局呈方向相关。然而,该干预措施可能会增加透析中的低血压,并可能降低血清[Na+],这与死亡风险增加有关。干预措施对整体患者健康和福祉的影响尚不清楚。需要进一步的证据,形式为在当代环境中进行的更长时间的研究,使用优化方法在小型机制研究中评估终末器官效应,以及在大型多中心 RCT 中评估临床结局。