• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适用于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版简版加修订版的ICD - 11兼容人格量表波斯语版本的验证。

Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5- Brief Form Plus, Modified.

作者信息

Komasi Saeid, Kerber Andre, Hopwood Christopher J

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience and Psychopathology Research, Mind GPS Institute, Kermanshah, Iran.

Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2025 May-Jun;107(3):306-316. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872
PMID:39499030
Abstract

Clinical assessment increasingly emphasizes six maladaptive domains of the DSM-5 and ICD-11 trait models, including negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, psychoticism, and anankastia. The present study aimed to validate the Persian version of the ICD-11 compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form Plus, Modified (PID5BF + M). Data from a mixed sample including 1,615 adults (community  = 1,476 and outpatient  = 139) were used to assess the latent structure, congruence coefficients, reliability, convergent validity, and criterion validity of the PID5BF + M. The results supported the six-factor structure of the PID5BF + M whose traits are largely congruent with those from previous studies. The scale reliabilities were acceptable, and strong associations were observed with personality disorder-type symptom counts ( ranging from .15 to .59, all < .001). PID5BF + M scales also distinguished clinical and non-clinical samples. The present results support the validity and utility of the PID5BF + M for personality psychopathology screening in the Iranian population.

摘要

临床评估越来越强调《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)和《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)特质模型的六个适应不良领域,包括消极情感性、脱离、敌对/反社会性、抑制解除、精神病性和强迫性。本研究旨在验证与ICD-11兼容的、针对DSM-5简版加修订版(PID5BF + M)的波斯语版人格量表。来自1615名成年人(社区样本 = 1476人,门诊样本 = 139人)的混合样本数据用于评估PID5BF + M的潜在结构、一致性系数、信度、聚合效度和效标效度。结果支持了PID5BF + M的六因素结构,其特质在很大程度上与先前研究的结果一致。量表信度是可接受的,并且观察到与人格障碍类型的症状计数有很强的关联(范围从0.15到0.59,均p < 0.001)。PID5BF + M量表也区分了临床样本和非临床样本。本研究结果支持了PID5BF + M在伊朗人群中进行人格精神病理学筛查的有效性和实用性。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Persian Version of the ICD-11 Compatible Personality Inventory for DSM-5- Brief Form Plus, Modified.适用于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版简版加修订版的ICD - 11兼容人格量表波斯语版本的验证。
J Pers Assess. 2025 May-Jun;107(3):306-316. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420872. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of PID5BF + M in Iranian Drug Users.伊朗吸毒者中PID5BF + M波斯语版本的心理测量特性
Personal Ment Health. 2025 Feb;19(1):e70005. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70005.
3
Reliability and validity of the Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) scale and the Revised Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD-11 (PAQ-11R) in a Norwegian community sample.在挪威社区样本中,人格障碍严重程度 ICD-11(PDS-ICD-11)量表和修订版人格评估问卷 ICD-11(PAQ-11R)的信度和效度。
Personal Ment Health. 2024 Nov;18(4):347-356. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1630. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格障碍特征的国际评估:迈向 DSM-5.1 中的共同分类学。
Psychopathology. 2020;53(3-4):179-188. doi: 10.1159/000507589. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
The Utility of ICD-11 and DSM-5 Traits for Differentiating Patients With Personality Disorders From Other Clinical Groups.国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)人格特质在区分人格障碍患者与其他临床群体中的效用
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 16;12:633882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.633882. eCollection 2021.
6
Bridging the ICD11 and the DSM-5 personality disorders classification systems: The role of the PID5BF + M.弥合国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)人格障碍分类系统之间的差距:人格障碍特质评定量表第5版简版(PID5BF + M)的作用
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 2;14:1004895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1004895. eCollection 2023.
7
Evaluation of a 36-item measure of ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality disorder trait domains and facets in Russian inpatients.对俄罗斯住院患者中一份关于国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)人格障碍特质领域及方面的36项测量工具的评估。
Psychol Assess. 2023 May;35(5):e22-e30. doi: 10.1037/pas0001223. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
8
Validation of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) algorithms to assess ICD-11 personality trait domains in a psychiatric sample.验证《精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版人格量表》(PID-5)算法在精神科样本中评估《国际疾病分类第 11 版》人格特质领域的适用性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):40-49. doi: 10.1037/pas0000746. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Development of a Short and ICD-11 Compatible Measure for Maladaptive Personality Traits Using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms.使用蚁群优化算法开发短程且与 ICD-11 兼容的适应不良人格特质测量工具。
Assessment. 2022 Apr;29(3):467-487. doi: 10.1177/1073191120971848. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the youth psychopathic traits inventory-short version with an Iranian adult clinical sample.伊朗成年临床样本中青少年精神病态特质问卷简版波斯语版本的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 29;13(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03175-0.
2
An Updated Validation of Persian Versions of Six Personality Questionnaires: TEMPS-A, AFECTS, TCI, PANAS, NEO-FFI, PDQ-4.六种人格问卷波斯语版本的更新验证:TEMPS-A、AFECTS、TCI、PANAS、NEO-FFI、PDQ-4
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 9:02537176241276741. doi: 10.1177/02537176241276741.
3
Research on the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) in Iran: A Narrative Literature Review.
伊朗人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)研究:叙事性文献综述
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 10:02537176241281888. doi: 10.1177/02537176241281888.