Foti Giovanni, Longo Chiara, Oliboni Eugenio, Faccioli Niccolò, Sanfilippo Lorenza, Guerriero Massimo, Augelli Raffaele, Motta Leonardo, Marocco Stefania
Department of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar;35(3):1647-1657. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11125-4. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) could combine the high-resolution bone window images made available by multi-detector CT technology with its capability to identify bone marrow edema (BME) in the spine, for diagnosing spondylodiscitis. Our objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MRI and non-contrast DECT to identify spondylodiscitis of the thoraco-lumbar spine.
This prospective study included 77 consecutive participants (39 males; mean age of 61) who underwent DECT and MRI (within 7 days) between January 2020 and October 2023. DECT data were post-processed on a dedicated offline workstation (SyngoVia® VB20) by using a three-material decomposition algorithm. Four radiologists, blinded to clinical data, evaluated non-contrast DECT and contrast-enhanced MRI images. The diagnosis of spondylodiscitis was based on vertebral edema, disc edema, endplate erosions, and paraspinal involvement. Diagnostic accuracy values were calculated by using biopsy as a standard of reference. A multi-reader multi-case analysis was performed.
Biopsy revealed a diagnosis of spondylodiscitis in 46 patients (60%). Thoracic and lumbar spondylodiscitis were diagnosed in 37/46 (80%) and 9/46 (20%) patients, respectively. DECT and MRI overall sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.91, 0.89, and 0.90, and 0.94, 0.93, and 0.93, respectively. At lumbar and thoracic levels, the difference between AUC values between DECT and MRI was not significant (p = 0.15). For DECT and MRI, a very good inter-reader agreement was achieved (k = 0.90 and k = 0.97, respectively).
Contrast-enhanced MRI represents the most accurate imaging tool for the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis. However, only a non-significant drop in diagnostic performance was achieved by evaluating non-contrast DECT images.
Question To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MRI and non-contrast DECT for identifying spondylodiscitis of the thoraco-lumbar spine. Findings MRI was not significantly superior compared to DECT in diagnosing spondylodiscitis, whereas the inter-reader agreement was near perfect for both MRI and DECT. Clinical relevance DECT represents a fast and accurate imaging tool for the demonstration of BME, erosions, and peri-vertebral inflammation in thoraco-lumbar spondylodiscitis.
双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)能够将多排CT技术提供的高分辨率骨窗图像与其识别脊柱骨髓水肿(BME)的能力相结合,用于诊断脊椎椎间盘炎。我们的目的是比较对比增强MRI和非对比DECT对胸腰椎脊椎椎间盘炎的诊断性能。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了2020年1月至2023年10月期间连续接受DECT和MRI检查(7天内)的77名参与者(39名男性;平均年龄61岁)。DECT数据在专用离线工作站(SyngoVia® VB20)上使用三物质分解算法进行后处理。四名对临床数据不知情的放射科医生评估了非对比DECT和对比增强MRI图像。脊椎椎间盘炎的诊断基于椎体水肿、椎间盘水肿、终板侵蚀和椎旁受累情况。以活检作为参考标准计算诊断准确性值。进行了多读者多病例分析。
活检显示46例患者(60%)诊断为脊椎椎间盘炎。胸段和腰段脊椎椎间盘炎分别在37/46(80%)和9/46(20%)的患者中被诊断出。DECT和MRI的总体敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为0.91、0.89和0.90,以及0.94、0.93和0.93。在腰段和胸段水平,DECT和MRI的AUC值差异不显著(p = 0.15)。对于DECT和MRI,读者间一致性非常好(分别为k = 0.90和k = 0.97)。
对比增强MRI是诊断脊椎椎间盘炎最准确的成像工具。然而,通过评估非对比DECT图像,诊断性能仅出现非显著下降。
问题:比较对比增强MRI和非对比DECT对胸腰椎脊椎椎间盘炎的诊断性能。发现:在诊断脊椎椎间盘炎方面,MRI与DECT相比并无显著优势,而MRI和DECT的读者间一致性均接近完美。临床意义:DECT是显示胸腰椎脊椎椎间盘炎中BME、侵蚀和椎周炎症的快速准确成像工具。