Suppr超能文献

非创伤性疼痛髋关节周围骨髓水肿:双能 CT 与 MRI 对比。

Bone marrow edema around the hip in non-traumatic pain: dual-energy CT vs MRI.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 10, 37024, Negrar, Italy.

Department of Radiology, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):4098-4106. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06775-z. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in identifying bone marrow edema (BME) around the hip joint in non-traumatic patients.

METHODS

This prospective IRB-approved study was conducted between January 2019 and October 2019 and included 59 consecutive patients (18 males, 41 females; mean age 61.5 years, range 32-82) who were assessed by DECT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within a 5-day period. Diagnostic accuracy values for diagnosing BME on a per-patient and on a per-partition-basis analysis were calculated for DECT images by two readers (R1 and R2, with 15 and 10 years of experience, respectively), using MRI as reference for diagnosis. Inter-observer agreements were calculated with k-statistics. A p value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

MRI depicted BME in 44/59 patients (74.58%), with the involvement of 83/708 (11.72%) partitions. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of R1 and R2 were 95.45% (42/44), 86.67% (13/15), and 93.22% (55/59) for R1, and 86.36% (38/44), 80.00% (12/15), and 84.75% (50/59) for R2. For both readers, the BME detection rate was higher in patients with severe edema (100%) in comparison to patients with mild edema (91.30% and 73.91%). In the partition-basis analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranges were 33.3 to 100%, 91.84 to 100%, and 88.14 to 100%, respectively. The inter-observer agreement for patients' analysis was substantial (k = 0.7065), whereas for partition analysis ranged from fair (k = 0.2976) to near-perfect (k = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

DECT can accurately identify BME around the hip joint, in comparison to MRI.

KEY POINTS

• DECT can accurately identify bone marrow edema around the hip joint in a cohort of non-traumatic patients. • The detection of bone marrow edema by means of DECT may help the radiologist to identify associated findings, including avascular necrosis of the femoral head and insufficiency or stress fractures. • In cases of patients suffering from groin pain with bone marrow edema identified by DECT, the concurrent reading of high-resolution conventional CT images may increase the confidence of diagnosis and/or reduce the reading time.

摘要

目的

评估双能 CT(DECT)在识别非创伤性患者髋关节周围骨髓水肿(BME)中的诊断准确性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性 IRB 批准的研究,于 2019 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月进行,共纳入 59 例连续患者(男 18 例,女 41 例;平均年龄 61.5 岁,范围 32-82 岁),在 5 天内同时接受 DECT 和磁共振成像(MRI)检查。两位读者(分别具有 15 年和 10 年经验的 R1 和 R2)通过 DECT 图像计算每位患者和每个分区基础上的 BME 诊断的诊断准确性值,并使用 MRI 作为诊断参考。采用 k 统计量计算观察者间一致性。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

MRI 显示 44/59 例(74.58%)患者存在 BME,83/708 个(11.72%)分区受累。R1 和 R2 的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为 95.45%(42/44)、86.67%(13/15)和 93.22%(55/59),86.36%(38/44)、80.00%(12/15)和 84.75%(50/59)。对于两位读者,严重水肿患者(100%)的 BME 检出率高于轻度水肿患者(91.30%和 73.91%)。在分区基础分析中,灵敏度、特异性和准确性范围分别为 33.3-100%、91.84-100%和 88.14-100%。对于患者分析,观察者间一致性较高(k=0.7065),而对于分区分析,范围从适度(k=0.2976)到近乎完美(k=1.000)。

结论

与 MRI 相比,DECT 可以准确识别髋关节周围的 BME。

关键点

• DECT 可准确识别非创伤性患者髋关节周围骨髓水肿。

• 通过 DECT 检测骨髓水肿有助于放射科医生识别相关发现,包括股骨头缺血性坏死和不足或应力性骨折。

• 在 DECT 发现骨髓水肿的腹股沟疼痛患者中,同时阅读高分辨率常规 CT 图像可能会增加诊断信心和/或减少阅读时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验