Gatz J David, Stryckman Benoit, Magder Laurence S, Deshmukh Sanyukta, Sutherland Mark, Gingold Daniel B
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, USA.
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;87:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.033. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
To measure the association between patient race and physical restraint use in the ED.
Adult patients presenting to eight rural, suburban, and urban EDs in a mid-Atlantic statewide hospital system ED between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2022 were included. Those arriving already restrained, transported from detention centers, or who left before services were provided were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression measured the association of physical restraint use with patient race, adjusting for age, sex, weight, height, mode of arrival, history of violent behavior, comorbidities, ESI acuity level, homelessness, and site.
Of 896,527 patient encounters included in the analysis, 3459 (0.39 %) had a physical restraint order. The study population was 48.7 % non-Hispanic White and 43.7 % non-Hispanic Black. Black patients had higher adjusted odds of being restrained relative to White patients (OR 1.26, 95 % CI 1.15-1.37). Other key variables associated with physical restraint use were an ESI level of 1 vs 3+ (OR 13.15, 95 % CI 11.49-15.04), arrival by law enforcement (8.39, 95 % CI 7.47-9.43), and arrival by EMS (5.36, 95 % CI 4.93-5.83 Among those who were restrained, the hazard of restraint was higher among Black compared to White patients in the first hour after ED arrival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.14, 95 % CI 1.01-1.30).
Black patients were more likely to be physically restrained compared to White patients, though the magnitude of this association was small compared to that of other clinical risk factors. Future work should evaluate if these findings are driven by differences in patient characteristics or clinician decision-making to best inform interventions to reduce this disparity.
测量急诊科患者种族与使用身体约束措施之间的关联。
纳入2019年1月1日至2022年6月30日期间在大西洋中部全州医院系统的8家农村、郊区和城市急诊科就诊的成年患者。那些到达时已被约束、从拘留中心转运而来或在提供服务前离开的患者被排除在外。多变量逻辑回归分析测量了使用身体约束措施与患者种族之间的关联,并对年龄、性别、体重、身高、到达方式、暴力行为史、合并症、急诊严重程度指数(ESI)水平、无家可归状况和就诊地点进行了调整。
在纳入分析的896,527次患者就诊中,3459例(0.39%)有身体约束医嘱。研究人群中48.7%为非西班牙裔白人,43.7%为非西班牙裔黑人。与白人患者相比,黑人患者被约束的调整后比值比更高(比值比1.26,95%置信区间1.15 - 1.37)。与使用身体约束措施相关的其他关键变量包括ESI水平为1级与3级以上(比值比13.15,95%置信区间11.49 - 15.04)、由执法人员送来(8.39,95%置信区间7.47 - 9.43)以及由紧急医疗服务(EMS)送来(5.36,95%置信区间4.93 - 5.83)。在被约束的患者中,黑人患者在急诊科到达后的第一小时内被约束的风险高于白人患者(调整后的风险比1.14,95%置信区间1.01 - 1.30)。
与白人患者相比,黑人患者更有可能被身体约束,尽管与其他临床风险因素相比,这种关联的程度较小。未来的工作应评估这些发现是否由患者特征差异或临床医生决策差异所驱动,以便为减少这种差异的干预措施提供最佳信息。