Nishioka Takuya, Yamaguchi Shota, Inami Takayuki
Institute of Physical Education, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Nov 5;20(1):56-64. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2024-0063. Print 2025 Jan 1.
The flight-time method (FT) is used for measuring vertical jump height (JH) in the field because of its convenience; however, FT overestimates JH when the lower limb is flexed at landing. Herein, we proposed a new method (ie, flight-time method modified [FTM]) to address the problem of FT and evaluate its validity and reliability.
A total of 24 men performed 6 countermovement jumps on force plates (sampling rate: 1000 Hz) while being recorded with a smartphone high-speed camera at 240 frames·s-1. JH was calculated by the impulse-momentum method (IM), FT, and FTM. For FTM, the flight time and JH were calculated based on the displacement of the greater-trochanter marker using a smartphone application.
JH calculated using FT was significantly higher (P < .001) compared with JH calculated by IM; however, JH calculated by FTM showed no significant difference with JH calculated by IM. Furthermore, JH calculated by FTM, compared with JH calculated by FT (ρ = .882; 95% CI, .838-.914), exhibited a stronger, nearly perfect, and significantly positive correlation (ρ = .987; 95% CI, .982-.991) with JH calculated by IM and showed high reliability.
The FTM proposed in this study had higher concurrent validity compared with FT and a high reliability for measuring countermovement JH because it was not affected by lower-extremity flexion at landing. Therefore, practitioners should consider using FTM as a convenient, low-cost, reliable, and more valid method for measuring JH in the field.
飞行时间法(FT)因其便捷性而被用于现场测量垂直跳跃高度(JH);然而,当下肢在着地时弯曲时,FT会高估JH。在此,我们提出一种新方法(即改良飞行时间法[FTM])来解决FT的问题,并评估其有效性和可靠性。
24名男性在测力板上进行6次反向纵跳(采样率:1000Hz),同时用智能手机高速摄像机以240帧·秒⁻¹的速度进行记录。JH通过冲量-动量法(IM)、FT和FTM进行计算。对于FTM,使用智能手机应用程序根据大转子标记的位移计算飞行时间和JH。
与通过IM计算的JH相比,使用FT计算的JH显著更高(P <.001);然而,通过FTM计算的JH与通过IM计算的JH没有显著差异。此外,与通过FT计算的JH相比(ρ =.882;95%CI,.838-.914),通过FTM计算的JH与通过IM计算的JH表现出更强、近乎完美且显著的正相关(ρ =.987;95%CI,.982-.991),并显示出高可靠性。
本研究中提出的FTM与FT相比具有更高的同时效度,并且在测量反向纵跳JH方面具有高可靠性,因为它不受着地时下肢弯曲的影响。因此,从业者应考虑将FTM作为一种方便、低成本、可靠且更有效的现场测量JH的方法。