Suppr超能文献

三种常用诱捕器与一种新型诱捕器采集的蚊虫种类组合比较

A Comparison Of Mosquito Species Assemblages Sampled With Three Commonly Used Traps And A Novel Design.

作者信息

Hall Loyal P, Yan Jiayue, Stone Chris M, Baker Thomas C

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University, Center for Chemical Ecology, 104 Chemical Ecology Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802.

Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1816 S Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820.

出版信息

J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;40(4):152-161. doi: 10.2987/23-7110.

Abstract

In nuisance or vector mosquito management, effective sampling is a stepping stone to efficient use of resources, targeted control efforts, and successful reduction of disease transmission. Experimental evidence indicates that there are species biases for certain traps, which in turn implies that the traps used will influence the species make-up of samples collected. A comparative study between 3 CO2-baited light traps and 2 hay-infusion baited gravid traps-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap, American BioPhysics Company (ABC) light trap, Reiter-Cummings (RC) gravid trap, and a convertible gravid/light trap with a novel design-was conducted to test for species specificity of each trap type. It was found that different species of mosquitoes are more likely to be collected in greater numbers with certain traps compared to others, even between the different light traps or gravid traps. In particular, Coquillettidia perturbans tended to be collected in greater numbers with CDC light traps, Culex salinarius tended to be collected in greater numbers with the experimental convertible light traps, and Culex pipiens tended to be collected in greater numbers with the Reiters-Cummings gravid traps over the other traps included in the study (P ≤ 0.05). The overall species richness of samples was comparable among trap types, with similar performance of the new trap designs as established designs (P ≤ 0.05).

摘要

在蚊虫滋扰或病媒蚊虫管理中,有效的采样是合理利用资源、开展精准控制工作以及成功减少疾病传播的重要一步。实验证据表明,某些诱捕器存在物种偏差,这意味着所使用的诱捕器会影响所采集样本的物种构成。开展了一项对比研究,比较3种二氧化碳诱捕灯诱捕器和2种干草浸液诱捕孕蚊诱捕器——疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)诱捕灯、美国生物物理公司(ABC)诱捕灯、赖特-卡明斯(RC)孕蚊诱捕器以及一种设计新颖的可转换孕蚊/诱捕灯诱捕器——以测试每种诱捕器类型的物种特异性。研究发现,与其他诱捕器相比,某些诱捕器更有可能捕获数量更多的不同种类蚊虫,即使在不同的诱捕灯或孕蚊诱捕器之间也是如此。特别是,在研究中,骚扰柯蚊往往在CDC诱捕灯下捕获数量更多,盐泽库蚊往往在实验性可转换诱捕灯下捕获数量更多,尖音库蚊往往在赖特-卡明斯孕蚊诱捕器下捕获数量多于其他诱捕器(P≤0.05)。各诱捕器类型样本的总体物种丰富度相当,新诱捕器设计与既定设计表现相似(P≤0.05)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验