Poli Arianna, Kåreholt Ingemar, Kelfve Susanne, Berg Katarina, Motel-Klingebiel Andreas
Division of Ageing and Social Change, Department of Culture and Society, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Institute of Gerontology, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Dec 11;80(1). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae265.
The involvement of older adults in research on digital health is uneven with respect to, for example, age, gender, health status, and digital skills. However, little is known regarding the effect of the uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes. This study helps to fill this knowledge gap, identifies the effects of uneven involvement of older adults in digital health research on researched outcomes, and also develops a correction for this.
Data are retrieved from a digital health intervention for postoperative monitoring of people who underwent day surgery in Sweden. Based on field information on the recruitment process and researched outcomes for the intervention, this study (i) tested intervention effects by using 2 standard unweighted procedures in a sample of 281 individuals aged 50 years or older, and then (ii) used the information on participants, nonparticipants, and their respective probabilities to be involved in the intervention study to perform a weighting of the intervention effects for each step of selection and for the study group membership.
The intervention effects were found to be overestimated due to overrepresentation of groups that gained from receiving the intervention. No intervention effects were found after adjustment for participation bias.
Selective participation of older adults in digital health research biases research outcomes and can lead to overestimation of intervention effects. Weighting allows researchers to correct and describe the effect of selective participation on researched outcomes.
老年人参与数字健康研究的情况在年龄、性别、健康状况和数字技能等方面并不均衡。然而,关于老年人在数字健康研究中参与不均衡对研究结果的影响,我们知之甚少。本研究有助于填补这一知识空白,确定老年人在数字健康研究中参与不均衡对研究结果的影响,并对此进行校正。
数据取自瑞典一项针对日间手术患者术后监测的数字健康干预措施。基于该干预措施招募过程的现场信息和研究结果,本研究(i)在281名50岁及以上个体的样本中,使用2种标准非加权程序测试干预效果,然后(ii)利用参与者、非参与者及其参与干预研究的各自概率信息,对选择的每个步骤以及研究组成员的干预效果进行加权。
由于从接受干预中获益的群体代表性过高,干预效果被高估。在调整参与偏倚后未发现干预效果。
老年人在数字健康研究中的选择性参与会使研究结果产生偏差,并可能导致对干预效果的高估。加权法使研究人员能够校正并描述选择性参与对研究结果的影响。