• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于测量老年人在数字健康研究中不参与情况的研究工具。

A research tool for measuring non-participation of older people in research on digital health.

机构信息

Division Ageing and Social Change (ASC), Linköping University, Kungsgatan 40, 601 74, Norrköping, Sweden.

Aging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Gävlegatan 16, 113 30, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):1487. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7830-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-7830-x
PMID:31703655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6842243/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare services are being increasingly digitalised in European countries. However, in studies evaluating digital health technology, some people are less likely to participate than others, e.g. those who are older, those with a lower level of education and those with poorer digital skills. Such non-participation in research - deriving from the processes of non-recruitment of targeted individuals and self-selection - can be a driver of old-age exclusion from new digital health technologies. We aim to introduce, discuss and test an instrument to measure non-participation in digital health studies, in particular, the process of self-selection.

METHODS

Based on a review of the relevant literature, we designed an instrument - the NPART survey questionnaire - for the analysis of self-selection, covering five thematic areas: socioeconomic factors, self-rated health and subjective overall quality of life, social participation, time resources, and digital skills and use of technology. The instrument was piloted on 70 older study persons in Sweden, approached during the recruitment process for a trial study.

RESULTS

Results indicated that participants, as compared to decliners, were on average slightly younger and more educated, and reported better memory, higher social participation, and higher familiarity with and greater use of digital technologies. Overall, the survey questionnaire was able to discriminate between participants and decliners on the key aspects investigated, along the lines of the relevant literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The NPART survey questionnaire can be applied to characterise non-participation in digital health research, in particular, the process of self-selection. It helps to identify underrepresented groups and their needs. Data generated from such an investigation, combined with hospital registry data on non-recruitment, allows for the implementation of improved sampling strategies, e.g. focused recruitment of underrepresented groups, and for the post hoc adjustment of results generated from biased samples, e.g. weighting procedures.

摘要

背景

欧洲各国的医疗服务正日益数字化。然而,在评估数字健康技术的研究中,有些人参与的可能性低于其他人,例如年龄较大、教育程度较低和数字技能较差的人。这种源于目标人群未招募和自我选择的研究参与度低的情况,可能会导致老年人被排除在新的数字健康技术之外。我们旨在引入、讨论和测试一种衡量数字健康研究中非参与度的工具,特别是自我选择的过程。

方法

我们基于对相关文献的回顾,设计了一种用于分析自我选择的工具——NPART 调查问卷,涵盖了五个主题领域:社会经济因素、自我评估的健康和主观总体生活质量、社会参与、时间资源以及数字技能和技术使用。该工具在瑞典的 70 名老年研究参与者中进行了试点,这些参与者是在一项试验研究的招募过程中被招募的。

结果

结果表明,与拒绝者相比,参与者的平均年龄稍小、受教育程度更高,并且报告记忆力更好、社会参与度更高、对数字技术的熟悉度和使用度更高。总体而言,该调查问卷能够根据相关文献,在研究参与者和拒绝者之间区分出关键方面。

结论

NPART 调查问卷可用于描述数字健康研究中的非参与度,特别是自我选择的过程。它有助于确定代表性不足的群体及其需求。从这种调查中生成的数据与医院登记的未招募数据相结合,可以实施改进的抽样策略,例如有针对性地招募代表性不足的群体,以及对来自有偏见样本的结果进行事后调整,例如加权程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ed/6842243/a5ea76a4bddf/12889_2019_7830_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ed/6842243/a5ea76a4bddf/12889_2019_7830_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ed/6842243/a5ea76a4bddf/12889_2019_7830_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A research tool for measuring non-participation of older people in research on digital health.一种用于测量老年人在数字健康研究中不参与情况的研究工具。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):1487. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7830-x.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Prediction of (Non)Participation of Older People in Digital Health Research: Exergame Intervention Study.老年人参与(或不参与)数字健康研究的预测:运动游戏干预研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 5;22(6):e17884. doi: 10.2196/17884.
4
Factors related to preference for participation and degree of commitment in community activities among older adults in Japanese depopulated areas.人口减少地区老年人参与社区活动的偏好和投入程度的相关因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Jan;28(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12836. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
5
Digital Divide in Perceived Benefits of Online Health Care and Social Welfare Services: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study.数字鸿沟对在线医疗保健和社会福利服务感知益处的影响:全国横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17616. doi: 10.2196/17616.
6
Ethnic differences in social participation and social capital in Malmö, Sweden: a population-based study.瑞典马尔默社会参与和社会资本的种族差异:一项基于人群的研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Apr;60(7):1527-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.015.
7
Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.让南亚患者参与临床试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(42):iii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta8420.
8
Community participation and sustainability--evidence over 25 years in the Västerbotten Intervention Programme.社区参与和可持续性——在韦斯特博滕干预计划中超过 25 年的证据。
Glob Health Action. 2012 Dec 17;5:1-9. doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.19166.
9
Ageing well: evaluation of social participation and quality of life tools to enhance community aged care (study protocol).健康老龄化:评估社会参与和生活质量工具以加强社区老年护理(研究方案)。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1094-2.
10
Social capital, the miniaturization of community and high alcohol consumption: a population-based study.社会资本、社区小型化与高酒精消费:一项基于人群的研究。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Nov-Dec;40(6):556-62. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh190. Epub 2005 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Plugged-in: a Canadian survey of technology ownership, access, use, and attitudes among emergency department patients.接入:一项关于加拿大急诊科患者技术设备拥有情况、获取途径、使用情况及态度的调查。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 30;7:1507936. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1507936. eCollection 2025.
2
Improving Recruitment Through Social Media and Web-Based Advertising to Evaluate the Genetic Risk and Long-Term Complications in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Community-Based Survey.通过社交媒体和网络广告改善招募,以评估史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的遗传风险及长期并发症:基于社区的调查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 7;27:e63712. doi: 10.2196/63712.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Non-response in surveys of very old people.对高龄老人的调查中的无应答情况。
Eur J Ageing. 2018 Sep 3;16(2):249-258. doi: 10.1007/s10433-018-0488-x. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Videoconferencing-Based Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders: Analyses of Nonparticipation.基于视频会议的酒精使用障碍治疗:未参与情况分析
JMIR Form Res. 2017 Sep 28;1(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/formative.6715.
3
Why patients decline participation in an intervention to reduce re-hospitalization through patient activation: whom are we missing?为何患者拒绝参与通过提高患者自我管理能力来减少再次住院的干预措施:我们遗漏了哪些人群?
Testing the Recruitment Frequency, Implementation Fidelity, and Feasibility of Outcomes of the Heart Failure Activity Coach Study (HEALTHY): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
测试心力衰竭活动指导研究(HEALTHY)的招募频率、实施保真度及结果可行性:先导随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 8;9:e62910. doi: 10.2196/62910.
4
Nonparticipation in a Digital Health Intervention Study Among Older Adults: Uneven Involvement, Biased Outcomes, and the Effect of Weighting.老年人未参与数字健康干预研究:参与不均衡、结果有偏差及加权的影响
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Dec 11;80(1). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae265.
5
Participation and engagement in online cognitive testing.参与和投入在线认知测试。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 26;14(1):14800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65617-w.
6
Understanding the use of CATI and web-based data collection methods during the pandemic among digitally challenged groups at FQHCs: data from the Research Program.了解在疫情期间社区卫生中心(FQHCs)中数字技术使用困难群体对计算机辅助电话调查(CATI)和基于网络的数据收集方法的应用:来自研究项目的数据
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jun 4;6:1379290. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1379290. eCollection 2024.
7
The participation of hard-to-reach older people in the research and development process of health technologies from the perspective of multipliers-A qualitative analysis.从传播者视角看,如何让难以接触的老年人参与卫生技术的研发:定性分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 3;12:1334180. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1334180. eCollection 2024.
8
Effectiveness of artificial intelligence vs. human coaching in diabetes prevention: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.人工智能与人工教练在糖尿病预防中的效果比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 May 16;25(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08177-8.
9
Digital exclusion and cognitive impairment in older people: findings from five longitudinal studies.老年人的数字排斥和认知障碍:五项纵向研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 7;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05026-w.
10
Evaluating the Digital Health Experience for Patients in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.评估初级保健中患者的数字健康体验:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 11;26:e50410. doi: 10.2196/50410.
Trials. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3187-9.
4
Older Adults' Reasons for Participating in an eHealth Prevention Trial: A Cross-Country, Mixed-Methods Comparison.老年人参与电子健康预防试验的原因:一项跨国、混合方法比较研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):843-849.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Dec 9.
5
New Perspectives on User Participation in Technology Design Processes: An Interdisciplinary Approach.用户参与技术设计过程的新视角:跨学科方法。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):45-57. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny112.
6
Participatory Design in Gerontechnology: A Systematic Literature Review.参与式设计在老年技术学中的应用:系统文献综述。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e16-e25. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny034.
7
Older Adults' Internet Use for Health Information: Digital Divide by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.老年人对互联网健康信息的使用:按种族/民族和社会经济地位划分的数字鸿沟。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jan;39(1):105-110. doi: 10.1177/0733464818770772. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Older adults' readiness to engage with eHealth patient education and self-care resources: a cross-sectional survey.老年人参与电子健康患者教育和自我护理资源的意愿:一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2986-0.
9
Why do people participate in health-related studies?人们为什么参与与健康相关的研究?
Int J Public Health. 2017 Dec;62(9):1059-1062. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1032-z. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
Internet use and the digital divide in the English longitudinal study of ageing.《英国老年纵向研究中的互联网使用与数字鸿沟》
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Jul 1;5(3):233. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0083-7. eCollection 2008 Sep.