• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共治理环境中的信任与不信任:概念化与检验监管关系中的联系

Trust and distrust in public governance settings: Conceptualising and testing the link in regulatory relations.

作者信息

Verhoest Koen, Latusek Dominika, Six Frédérique, Maman Libby, Papadopoulos Yannis, Schomaker Rahel M, Trondal Jarle

机构信息

Department of Political Science & GOVTRUST Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Centre for Trust Studies, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

J Trust Res. 2024 Sep 2;14(2):127-156. doi: 10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918
PMID:39502082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11537161/
Abstract

The relationship between trust and distrust in public governance is still an open question. In the literature, three different perspectives on how trust and distrust are related are intensively debated: (1) trust and distrust as two ends of the same conceptual continuum; (2) trust and distrust as opposites, but with neutral ground in between; and (3) trust and distrust as related, yet distinct concepts. Employing a new measure for distrust and by using perceptual data on trust and distrust in regulatory agencies from multiple types of stakeholders in nine countries and three sectors, this article shows that high trust and high distrust can co-exist at the same time, and that trust and distrust are negatively correlated only to a limited extent. Moreover, while trustworthiness correlates strongly with trust, trustworthiness does not or only weakly correlate with distrust in a negative way. These findings are robust even when controlling for respondents' characteristics, different types of stakeholders, sectors and countries. This suggests that in public governance settings trust and distrust should be considered as distinct concepts, and the article calls for more research into the distinctiveness of the measurement, causes and effects of distrust, compared to trust.

摘要

在公共治理中,信任与不信任之间的关系仍是一个悬而未决的问题。在文献中,关于信任与不信任如何相互关联存在三种不同观点,并引发了激烈争论:(1)信任与不信任是同一概念连续体的两端;(2)信任与不信任是对立的,但中间存在中立地带;(3)信任与不信任相互关联,但却是不同的概念。本文采用一种新的不信任度量方法,并利用来自九个国家三个部门多种类型利益相关者对监管机构信任与不信任的感知数据,表明高度信任和高度不信任可以同时存在,而且信任与不信任仅在有限程度上呈负相关。此外,虽然可信度与信任密切相关,但可信度与不信任不存在负相关或仅存在微弱的负相关。即使在控制了受访者特征、不同类型利益相关者、部门和国家等因素后,这些发现依然稳健。这表明在公共治理环境中,应将信任和不信任视为不同的概念,并且本文呼吁相较于信任,应更多地研究不信任在度量、成因及影响方面的独特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3179/11537161/f045d18e543a/RJTR_A_2383918_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3179/11537161/6cad17a0a798/RJTR_A_2383918_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3179/11537161/be33252bb267/RJTR_A_2383918_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3179/11537161/f045d18e543a/RJTR_A_2383918_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3179/11537161/6cad17a0a798/RJTR_A_2383918_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3179/11537161/be33252bb267/RJTR_A_2383918_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3179/11537161/f045d18e543a/RJTR_A_2383918_F0003_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust and distrust in public governance settings: Conceptualising and testing the link in regulatory relations.公共治理环境中的信任与不信任:概念化与检验监管关系中的联系
J Trust Res. 2024 Sep 2;14(2):127-156. doi: 10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918. eCollection 2024.
2
Conceptualizing Trust and Distrust as Alternative Stable States: Lessons from the Flint Water Crisis.将信任与不信任概念化为交替稳定状态:来自弗林特水危机的教训
Ecol Soc. 2023 Sep;28(3). doi: 10.5751/es-14410-280314.
3
Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust, Mistrust, and Distrust: Implications for Advancing Health Equity and Building Trustworthiness.概念化、衡量信任、不信任和怀疑:对推进健康公平和建立值得信赖关系的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):465-484. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-061022-044737. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
4
A survey on self-medication for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 and distrust in healthcare of veterans in a primary care setting in the United States.美国基层医疗环境中退伍军人预防或治疗新冠病毒病的自我药疗及对医疗保健不信任情况的调查
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2022 Dec 15;13:20420986221143265. doi: 10.1177/20420986221143265. eCollection 2022.
5
Trust and distrust in interorganisational relations-Scale development.组织间关系中的信任与不信任——量表开发。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 16;17(12):e0279231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279231. eCollection 2022.
6
Does distrust in providers affect health-care utilization in China?对医疗服务提供者的不信任会影响中国的医疗保健利用情况吗?
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Oct;31(8):1001-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw024. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
7
Trust and Distrust as Artifacts of Language: A Latent Semantic Approach to Studying Their .作为语言产物的信任与不信任:一种研究它们的潜在语义方法
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 26;11:561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00561. eCollection 2020.
8
Development and testing of the health care system distrust scale.医疗保健系统不信任量表的开发与测试。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21146.x.
9
Governance mechanisms in the physician-patient relationship: a literature review and conceptual framework.医患关系中的治理机制:文献综述与概念框架
Health Expect. 2013 Mar;16(1):14-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00807.x. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
10
Institutional Distrust among African Americans and Building Trustworthiness in the COVID-19 Response: Implications for Ethical Public Health Practice.非裔美国人对机构的不信任与在新冠疫情应对中建立可信度:对道德公共卫生实践的启示。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(1):90-98. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0010.

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptualizing Trust and Distrust as Alternative Stable States: Lessons from the Flint Water Crisis.将信任与不信任概念化为交替稳定状态:来自弗林特水危机的教训
Ecol Soc. 2023 Sep;28(3). doi: 10.5751/es-14410-280314.
2
Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature.信任与新冠疫情:信任的后果及对信任而言的后果是什么?文献的早期综述
Polit Stud Rev. 2021 May;19(2):274-285. doi: 10.1177/1478929920948684.
3
Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public's Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China.
食品安全风险感知是否会影响公众对政府的信任?基于全国性调查的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 28;16(11):1874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111874.
4
Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature.信任与风险感知:文献综述
Risk Anal. 2021 Mar;41(3):480-490. doi: 10.1111/risa.13325. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Suspicious spirits, flexible minds: when distrust enhances creativity.可疑的精神,灵活的思维:当不信任增强创造力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1262-77. doi: 10.1037/a0024407. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
6
Silence speaks volumes: the effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations.沉默胜过千言万语:相较于道歉和否认,沉默在应对基于正直和能力的信任侵犯时的有效性。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):893-908. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.893.
7
Why do I hate thee? Conflict misperceptions and intergroup mistrust.为何我憎恶你?冲突误解与群体间不信任。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1295-311. doi: 10.1177/0146167206289979.