Halajyan Christina Perjuhi, Thomas Jonathan, Xu Benjamin, Gluckstein Jeffrey, Jiang Xuejuan
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Texas A&M School of Medicine, Bryan, TX, United States.
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 27:2024.10.25.24316160. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.25.24316160.
There has been an increase in the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review used systematic search and review criteria to assess the literature on patient and physician perspectives toward telemedicine for vision care during the pandemic.
We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms to identify peer-reviewed studies examining telemedicine use in eye care during the pandemic. The search strategy encompassed three key concepts: COVID-19 or pandemic, telehealth or telemedicine, and eye care. Further screening of references and similar articles was conducted to identify additional relevant studies.
We identified 24 relevant studies published between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 15 focused on patients' perspectives, while 12 explored physicians' perspectives. Predominantly cross-sectional in design, these studies were mainly conducted during the initial wave of the pandemic (March 2020 to June 2020), primarily in urban locations and hospital settings. Patients were satisfied with telemedicine and considered it equally effective to in-person visits. Patients believed telemedicine was convenient, improved eye care access, and a beneficial triage tool. Physicians acknowledged telemedicine's convenience for follow-up assessment and its ability to expand the capacity for emergency cases. However, both patients and physicians voiced concerns about the absence of ancillary examination and technological challenges.
Our review highlights the positive impact of telemedicine in eye care during the pandemic. Nonetheless, most studies were limited in sample size. They did not delve into potential disparities based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, factors that could influence patient attitudes toward telemedicine. Further research is warranted to validate the findings from our selected studies and explore factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine, particularly across various eye care subspecialties.
在新冠疫情期间,远程医疗的应用有所增加。本综述采用系统检索和综述标准,以评估关于疫情期间患者和医生对视力保健远程医疗的看法的文献。
我们使用相关医学主题词在PubMed、Embase和Scopus上进行了全面检索,以识别在疫情期间研究远程医疗在眼科护理中应用的同行评审研究。检索策略涵盖三个关键概念:新冠病毒或疫情、远程医疗或远程保健以及眼科护理。对参考文献和类似文章进行了进一步筛选,以识别其他相关研究。
我们确定了2020年至2022年期间发表的24项相关研究。其中,15项关注患者的看法,12项探讨医生的看法。这些研究主要为横断面设计,主要在疫情的第一波期间(2020年3月至2020年6月)进行,主要在城市地区和医院环境中。患者对远程医疗感到满意,并认为其与面对面就诊同样有效。患者认为远程医疗方便、改善了眼科护理的可及性,是一种有益的分诊工具。医生认可远程医疗在随访评估方面的便利性及其扩大急诊病例处理能力的作用。然而,患者和医生都对缺乏辅助检查和技术挑战表示担忧。
我们的综述强调了疫情期间远程医疗在眼科护理中的积极影响。尽管如此,大多数研究的样本量有限。它们没有深入探讨基于种族/民族、社会经济地位和地理位置的潜在差异,而这些因素可能会影响患者对远程医疗的态度。有必要进行进一步研究,以验证我们所选研究的结果,并探索影响远程医疗实施的因素,特别是在各种眼科护理亚专业中。