• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

testCompareR:一个用于使用配对数据比较两种二元诊断测试的R包。

testCompareR: an R package to compare two binary diagnostic tests using paired data.

作者信息

Wilson Kyle J, Roldán-Nofuentes José A, Henrion Marc Y R

机构信息

University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.

Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Southern Region, Malawi.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Nov 26;9:351. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22411.3. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22411.3
PMID:39502862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11535492/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Binary diagnostic tests are commonly used in medicine to answer a question about a patient's clinical status, most commonly, do they or do they not have some disease. Recent advances in statistical methodologies for performing inferential statistics to compare commonly used test metrics for two diagnostic tests have not yet been implemented in a statistical package.

METHODS

Up-to-date statistical methods to compare the test metrics achieved by two binary diagnostic tests are implemented in the new R package testCompareR. The output and efficiency of testCompareR is compared to the only other available package which performs this function, DTComPair, as well as an open-source program, compbdt, using a motivating example.

RESULTS

testCompareR achieves similar results to DTComPair using statistical methods with improved coverage and asymptotic performance. Further, testCompareR is faster than the currently available package and requires fewer pre-processing steps in order to produce accurate results.

CONCLUSIONS

testCompareR provides a new tool to compare the test metrics for two binary diagnostic tests compared with the gold standard. This tool allows flexible inputs, which minimises the need for data pre-processing, and operates in very few steps, so that it is easy to use even for those less experienced with R. testCompareR achieves results comparable to those computed by DTComPair, using optimised statistical methods and with improved computational efficiency.

摘要

背景

二元诊断测试在医学中常用于回答有关患者临床状况的问题,最常见的是他们是否患有某种疾病。用于进行推断统计以比较两种诊断测试常用测试指标的统计方法的最新进展尚未在统计软件包中实现。

方法

新的R包testCompareR中实现了用于比较两种二元诊断测试所获得的测试指标的最新统计方法。使用一个激励性示例,将testCompareR的输出和效率与另一个执行此功能的可用包DTComPair以及一个开源程序compbdt进行比较。

结果

使用具有改进的覆盖率和渐近性能的统计方法,testCompareR与DTComPair取得了相似的结果。此外,testCompareR比当前可用的包更快,并且为了产生准确的结果需要更少的预处理步骤。

结论

testCompareR提供了一种新工具,用于将两种二元诊断测试的测试指标与金标准进行比较。该工具允许灵活输入,从而最大限度地减少数据预处理的需求,并且只需很少的步骤即可运行,因此即使对于那些R经验较少的人来说也很容易使用。testCompareR使用优化的统计方法并提高了计算效率,取得了与DTComPair计算结果相当的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/bae47bd4dd8d/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/a9836000d59d/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/ea5853059362/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/5eaf16f8c599/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/bae47bd4dd8d/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/a9836000d59d/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/ea5853059362/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/5eaf16f8c599/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2fe/11599799/bae47bd4dd8d/wellcomeopenres-9-25879-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
testCompareR: an R package to compare two binary diagnostic tests using paired data.testCompareR:一个用于使用配对数据比较两种二元诊断测试的R包。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Nov 26;9:351. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22411.3. eCollection 2024.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
10
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Discriminability of the Beck Depression Inventory and its Abbreviations in an Adolescent Psychiatric Sample.贝克抑郁量表及其缩写在青少年精神病样本中的可辨别性。
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;13(1):9-21. doi: 10.2478/sjcapp-2025-0002. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Understanding malarial retinopathy: key predictors of cerebral parasite sequestration in an autopsy cohort.了解疟疾视网膜病变:尸检队列中脑内寄生虫滞留的关键预测因素
Eye (Lond). 2024 Dec;38(18):3601-3602. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03329-1. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Compbdt: an R program to compare two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design.Compbdt:一个用于比较配对设计下两种二分类诊断试验的 R 程序。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00988-y.
2
D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.用于排除肺栓塞诊断的D-二聚体检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 5;2016(8):CD010864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010864.pub2.
3
A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests.加权广义评分统计量用于比较诊断试验的预测值。
Stat Med. 2013 Mar 15;32(6):964-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.5587. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
4
Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.配对设计中两种二元诊断试验似然比的比较。
Stat Med. 2007 Sep 30;26(22):4179-201. doi: 10.1002/sim.2850.
5
Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.诊断测试4:似然比。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):168-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168.
6
Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values.诊断测试2:预测值。
BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102.
7
Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.诊断测试。1:敏感性和特异性。
BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552.
8
Home pregnancy testing kits: prevalence of use, false-negative rates, and compliance with instructions.家用妊娠检测试剂盒:使用情况、假阴性率及对说明书的依从性
Am J Public Health. 1982 Sep;72(9):1034-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.9.1034.
9
Exercise stress testing. Correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary-artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).运动负荷试验。冠状动脉外科研究(CASS)中,心绞痛病史、ST段反应与冠状动脉疾病患病率之间的相关性。
N Engl J Med. 1979 Aug 2;301(5):230-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197908023010502.