Catalao Raquel, Broadbent Matthew, Ashworth Mark, Das-Munshi Jayati, L Hatch Stephani, Hotopf Matthew, Dorrington Sarah
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.
South West London and St George´s Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Nov 6. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02787-y.
Significant numbers of people in England have fallen into a gap between primary care psychological therapies and specialist mental health services. We aim to examine pathways to care by looking at demographic variation in detection and referral to primary and secondary psychological services in south London.
Longitudinal descriptive study using a record linkage between a primary care database (Lambeth DataNet) and a secondary care mental health database (CRIS). We extracted data on mental health diagnosis, prescriptions and episodes of care in mental health services for all patients of working age registered from 1 January 2008 to 1 March 2018 (pre-covid era).
Of those with a mental disorder detected in primary care (n = 110,419; 26.8%); 33.7% (n = 37,253) received no treatment; 21.3% (n = 23,548) exclusively accessed psychological treatment within NHS Talking Therapies and 7.6% accessed secondary care psychological therapies. People from minoritised groups were more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication as the only treatment offered compared to the White British group. Men, Black African and Asian groups were less likely to access NHS Talking Therapies. People with a personality disorder diagnosis had the highest prevalence and number of NHS Talking Therapies treatment episodes (48.0%, n = 960), a similar percentage (44.1%, n = 881) received secondary care psychology treatment.
Our study highlights marked inequalities in access to psychological therapies for men and people from some minoritised ethnic groups across primary and secondary care and how individuals with personality disorders are offered multiple short-term courses in NHS Talking Therapies even where this is not recommended treatment.
在英格兰,相当数量的人处于初级保健心理治疗与专科心理健康服务之间的空白地带。我们旨在通过研究伦敦南部初级和二级心理服务在检测和转诊方面的人口统计学差异,来探讨护理途径。
采用纵向描述性研究,利用初级保健数据库(兰贝斯数据网)和二级保健心理健康数据库(CRIS)之间的记录链接。我们提取了2008年1月1日至2018年3月1日(新冠疫情前时代)登记的所有工作年龄患者的心理健康诊断、处方和心理健康服务护理事件的数据。
在初级保健中被检测出患有精神障碍的患者中(n = 110,419;26.8%),33.7%(n = 37,253)未接受治疗;21.3%(n = 23,548)仅在国民保健服务谈话治疗中接受心理治疗,7.6%接受二级保健心理治疗。与英国白人组相比,少数族裔群体的人更有可能被开具精神药物作为唯一提供的治疗。男性、非洲裔和亚裔群体获得国民保健服务谈话治疗的可能性较小。被诊断患有精神人格障碍的患者在国民保健服务谈话治疗护理事件中的患病率和数量最高(48.0%,n = 960),接受二级保健心理治疗的比例相似(44.1%,n = 881)。
我们的研究突出了男性和一些少数族裔群体在初级和二级保健中获得心理治疗方面存在的明显不平等,以及即使在不推荐的情况下,患有精神人格障碍的个体如何在国民保健服务谈话治疗中获得多个短期疗程。