Suppr超能文献

急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病中屈伸旋转试验的诊断准确性及临界值:一项横断面研究的二次分析

Diagnostic accuracy of the flexion-rotation test and cut-off value in acute whiplash-associated disorders: A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Anarte-Lazo Ernesto, Rodriguez-Blanco Cleofas, Bernal-Utrera Carlos

机构信息

Doctoral Program in Health Sciences, University of Seville, Seville, Spain; Faculty of Health, UNIE University, 28015, Madrid, Spain.

Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):101134. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101134. Epub 2024 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Headache is common in people with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Upper-cervical structures may be involved in the presence of headache, and the flexion-rotation test (FRT) has been widely studied to assess cervicogenic headaches.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the FRT for the presence of headache in people with WAD, and its cut-off value.

METHODS

In this secondary analysis from a previously published study 47 people with WAD were consecutively recruited, 28 with and 19 without headache. FRT was assessed by a single blinded evaluator, with production of headache during the test as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were assessed through cross-tabulation. The cut-off value was calculated based on the Youden's Index. The positivity of the test was defined based on: a) range of motion (ROM) <32°; and ROM <32° combined with headache provocation.

RESULTS

Differences between groups were significant for both most and least restricted sides of FRT in terms of ROM (p < 0.001). For the most restricted side, moderate sensitivity and specificity was found (82.1% [95%CI = 68.4%, 95.8%] and 63.2% [95%CI = 40.8%, 85.6%], respectively) when only ROM was considered. When headache provocation was included, sensitivity and specificity were 78.6% (95%CI = 63.1%, 93.7%) and 68.4% (95%CI = 47.5%, 88.5%), respectively. A cut-off value of 31.5° was found.

CONCLUSION

Moderate diagnostic accuracy through both ways of assessing the FRT was found for this test to detect the presence of whiplash-associated headache from upper cervical origin. The FRT may be considered positive if ROM is less than 31.5°.

摘要

背景

头痛在挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)患者中很常见。上颈椎结构可能与头痛的发生有关,并且屈曲旋转试验(FRT)已被广泛研究用于评估颈源性头痛。

目的

评估FRT对WAD患者头痛存在情况的诊断准确性及其截断值。

方法

在这项对先前发表研究的二次分析中,连续招募了47例WAD患者,其中28例有头痛,19例无头痛。由一名单盲评估者评估FRT,以测试期间出现头痛作为参考标准。通过交叉表评估敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性和阴性似然比。基于约登指数计算截断值。根据以下定义测试的阳性结果:a)活动范围(ROM)<32°;以及ROM<32°并伴有头痛激发。

结果

就ROM而言,FRT最受限侧和最不受限侧的组间差异均具有显著性(p<0.001)。对于最受限侧,仅考虑ROM时,发现中等敏感性和特异性(分别为82.1%[95%CI=68.4%,95.8%]和63.2%[95%CI=40.8%,85.6%])。当包括头痛激发时,敏感性和特异性分别为78.6%(95%CI=63.1%,93.7%)和68.4%(95%CI=47.5%,88.5%)。发现截断值为31.5°。

结论

通过两种评估FRT的方式均发现该测试对于检测源自上颈椎的挥鞭样损伤相关头痛的存在具有中等诊断准确性。如果ROM小于31.5°,则FRT可被视为阳性。

相似文献

3
Validity of eyeball estimation for range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation test compared to an ultrasound-based movement analysis system.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Aug;34(8):622-628. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1423523. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
The diagnostic validity of the cervical side bend-rotation test for C 1/2 dysfunction.
J Man Manip Ther. 2025 Apr;33(2):133-141. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2430506. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
5
Comparative analysis and diagnostic accuracy of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
J Headache Pain. 2010 Oct;11(5):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s10194-010-0222-3. Epub 2010 May 28.
7
Headache production during physical examination in patients with and without headache attributed to a whiplash injury: A case-control study.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Aug;66:102779. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102779. Epub 2023 May 29.
8
Upper cervical range of motion is impaired in patients with temporomandibular disorders.
Cranio. 2015 Apr;33(2):91-9. doi: 10.1179/0886963414Z.00000000053. Epub 2014 May 23.
10
The influence of lower cervical joint pain on range of motion and interpretation of the flexion-rotation test.
J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Sep;18(3):126-31. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712293.

本文引用的文献

1
Headache features in people with whiplash associated disorders: A scoping review.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Aug;66:102802. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102802. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
2
Headache production during physical examination in patients with and without headache attributed to a whiplash injury: A case-control study.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Aug;66:102779. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102779. Epub 2023 May 29.
3
Physical testing in patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders: A within session test-retest reliability study.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Apr;64:102738. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102738. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
7
Cervicogenic Headache: Current Perspectives.
Neurol India. 2021 Mar-Apr;69(Supplement):S194-S198. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.315992.
8
Neck pain and headache after whiplash injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pain. 2020 May;161(5):880-888. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001805.
9
Exercise, headache, and factors associated with headache in chronic whiplash: Analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(48):e18130. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018130.
10
A Neuroscience Perspective of Physical Treatment of Headache and Neck Pain.
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 26;10:276. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00276. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验