• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证一种评估美国落基山大学物理治疗教育中学生使用真实患者的感知的测量工具:一种方法学研究。

Development and validation of a measurement tool to assess student perceptions of using real patients in physical therapy education at the Rocky Mountain University, the United States: a methodological study.

机构信息

Doctor of Philosophy Program in Health Sciences, Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, UT, USA.

Department of Physical Therapy, Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, UT, USA.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:30. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.30. Epub 2024 Nov 7.

DOI:10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.30
PMID:39505302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11637597/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop and validate the Student Perceptions of Real Patient Use in Physical Therapy Education (SPRP-PTE) survey to assess physical therapy student (SPT) perceptions regarding real patient use in didactic education.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study developed a 48-item survey and tested the survey on 130 SPTs. Face and content validity were determined by an expert review and content validity index (CVI). Construct validity and internal consistency reliability were determined via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Cronbach’s α.

RESULTS

Three main constructs were identified (value, satisfaction, and confidence), each having 4 subconstruct components (overall, cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning). Expert review demonstrated adequate face and content validity (CVI=96%). The initial EFA of the 48-item survey revealed items with inconsistent loadings and low correlations, leading to the removal of 18 items. An EFA of the 30-item survey demonstrated 1-factor loadings of all survey constructs except satisfaction and the entire survey. All constructs had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s α >0.85).

CONCLUSION

The SPRP-PTE survey provides a reliable and valid way to assess student perceptions of real patient use. Future studies are encouraged to validate the SPRP-PTE survey further.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发和验证学生对物理治疗教育中实际患者使用的感知(SPRP-PTE)调查,以评估物理治疗学生(SPT)对教学中实际患者使用的感知。

方法

这项横断面观察性研究开发了一个 48 项的调查,并在 130 名 SPT 中测试了该调查。通过专家审查和内容效度指数(CVI)确定了表面效度和内容效度。通过探索性因素分析(EFA)和 Cronbach 的α确定了结构效度和内部一致性信度。

结果

确定了三个主要结构(价值、满意度和信心),每个结构都有 4 个子结构成分(整体、认知、心理运动和情感学习)。专家审查表明具有足够的表面效度和内容效度(CVI=96%)。48 项调查的初始 EFA 显示出项目的负荷不一致和相关性低,导致 18 个项目被删除。30 项调查的 EFA 显示,除满意度和整个调查外,所有调查结构的负荷都为 1 个因素。所有结构的内部一致性都足够高(Cronbach 的α>0.85)。

结论

SPRP-PTE 调查提供了一种可靠和有效的方法来评估学生对实际患者使用的感知。鼓励未来的研究进一步验证 SPRP-PTE 调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d444/11637597/171d230117b9/jeehp-21-30f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d444/11637597/d5434751948b/jeehp-21-30f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d444/11637597/171d230117b9/jeehp-21-30f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d444/11637597/d5434751948b/jeehp-21-30f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d444/11637597/171d230117b9/jeehp-21-30f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a measurement tool to assess student perceptions of using real patients in physical therapy education at the Rocky Mountain University, the United States: a methodological study.开发和验证一种评估美国落基山大学物理治疗教育中学生使用真实患者的感知的测量工具:一种方法学研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:30. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.30. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
2
Psychometric properties of the newly developed self-report environmental determinants of health questionnaire (EDH-Q): development and validation.新开发的自我报告健康环境决定因素问卷(EDH-Q)的心理测量学特性:编制与验证。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 13;12(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01782-x.
3
Psychometric properties of the questionnaire for educational justice assessment-student perspective (QEJA-SP) as a reliable tool to inform managers about students' perceptions.从学生视角评估教育公平问卷(QEJA-SP)的心理测量特性,作为向管理人员传达学生看法的可靠工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 19;25(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07173-z.
4
Development and validation of a tool to measure telehealth educational environment (THEEM).远程医疗教育环境测量工具(THEEM)的开发与验证
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06751-5.
5
Validation of the 21st Century Skills Assessment Scale for public health students in Thailand: a methodological study.泰国公共卫生专业学生21世纪技能评估量表的验证:一项方法学研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:37. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.37. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
6
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.一种用于测量医学生对评估环境认知的工具的开发:初步验证
Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015.
7
Psychometric properties of the social determinants of health questionnaire (SDH-Q): development and validation.健康的社会决定因素问卷(SDH-Q)的心理计量特性:编制与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):2507. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19990-w.
8
Development and validation of COVID-19 vaccination perception (CoVaP) instrument among healthcare workers in Malaysia.马来西亚医护人员中COVID-19疫苗接种认知(CoVaP)工具的开发与验证
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 23;13:e19318. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19318. eCollection 2025.
9
Assessment of the validity and reliability of the nurses' professional values scale-revised in Persian version among nursing students.评估波斯语版修订后的护士职业价值观量表在护理专业学生中的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06677-y.
10
Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure educational agility: a psychometric assessment using exploratory factor analysis.开发和验证用于测量教育灵活性的问卷:使用探索性因素分析的心理测量评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 9;24(1):1284. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06307-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Simulation-Based Education in Physical Therapist Professional Education: A Scoping Review.基于模拟的物理治疗师专业教育:范围综述。
Phys Ther. 2022 Dec 6;102(12). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac133.
2
One Size Doesn't Fit All: Using Factor Analysis to Gather Validity Evidence When Using Surveys in Your Research.一刀切不适用:在研究中使用调查时,使用因子分析收集有效性证据。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Mar;18(1):rm1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064.
3
A mixed methods study of student perceptions of using standardized patients for learning and evaluation.
一项关于学生对使用标准化病人进行学习和评估的看法的混合方法研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014 Aug 12;5:241-55. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S62446. eCollection 2014.
4
Using simulation and patient role play to teach electrocardiographic rhythms to physical therapy students.利用模拟和患者角色扮演向物理治疗专业学生传授心电图节律知识。
Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012 Mar;23(1):36-42.
5
Medical student and faculty perceptions of volunteer outpatients versus simulated patients in communication skills training.医学生和教师对志愿者门诊患者与模拟患者在沟通技巧培训中的看法。
Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1437-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182305bc0.
6
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
7
Using real patients in problem-based learning: students' comments on the value of using real, as opposed to paper cases, in a problem-based learning module in general practice.在基于问题的学习中使用真实患者:学生对在全科医学基于问题的学习模块中使用真实病例而非纸质病例的价值的评论。
Med Educ. 2001 Jan;35(1):27-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00841.x.
8
Determination and quantification of content validity.内容效度的确定与量化。
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5.