Zaid Siti Nur Aisyah, Abdul Kadir Azidah, Norhayati Mohd Noor, Ahmad Basaruddin, Yusoff Muhamad Saiful Bahri, Ramli Anis Safura, Liew Jasy Suet Yan
School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Hospital Pakar Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 23;13:e19318. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19318. eCollection 2025.
Healthcare workers (HCWs) play an essential role in facilitating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, and their confidence in vaccination is crucial. Nevertheless, valid instruments for assessing the HCWs' perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination were lacking. This study aims to develop and validate the COVID-19 Vaccination Perceptions (CoVaP) instrument among HCWs in Malaysia.
A literature review and discussion with research teams were conducted to identify the content to be considered. The instrument was developed in Malay language and underwent back-to-back translations to the English version. The initial CoVaP instrument was unidimensional with 12 items. The Malay and English versions underwent a content validation process by seven expert panels. However, only the Malay version underwent face and construct validation. Face validity was assessed using 30 HCWs. The construct validation was conducted in a two-step process using data from two cross-sectional study samples, including 125 and 300 HCWs for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. It was a self-administered questionnaire, and the data were collected using both face-to-face and online platforms. The data were analysed using Analysis of Moment Structure version 28.0 and Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences version 26.
The analysis showed excellent content (item content validity index (I-CVI) = 0.83 to 1.0, average content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) = 0.97) and face (item face validity index (I-FVI) = 0.87 to 1.0, average face validity index (S-FVI/Ave) = 1.02) validity. The EFA analysis revealed seven items with two domains. Subsequent analysis using CFA demonstrated a two-factor model of seven items with an acceptable level of goodness of fit indexes (comparative fit index = 0.999, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.999, incremental fit index = 0.987, chi-squared/degree of freedom = 1.039, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.011). Finally, the Cronbach's alpha was satisfactory for both domains (0.899 and 0.815).
The CoVaP instrument is a valid and reliable tool for measuring perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs. The high validity and reliability of the CoVaP instrument underscore its utility in capturing the unique cultural and contextual factors influencing vaccine perceptions among Malaysian HCWs. Understanding these factors is essential for designing effective public health interventions to address vaccine hesitancy and improve vaccination rates.
医护人员在推动2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗接种方面发挥着至关重要的作用,他们对疫苗接种的信心至关重要。然而,缺乏评估医护人员对COVID-19疫苗接种看法的有效工具。本研究旨在开发并验证马来西亚医护人员的COVID-19疫苗接种认知(CoVaP)工具。
进行了文献综述并与研究团队进行了讨论,以确定要考虑的内容。该工具以马来语开发,并进行了前后翻译以得到英语版本。最初的CoVaP工具是单维度的,有12个项目。马来语和英语版本由七个专家小组进行了内容验证过程。然而,只有马来语版本进行了表面效度和结构效度验证。使用30名医护人员评估表面效度。结构效度通过两步过程进行,分别使用来自两个横断面研究样本的数据进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA),其中探索性因素分析样本包括125名医护人员,验证性因素分析样本包括300名医护人员。这是一份自填式问卷,数据通过面对面和在线平台收集。使用Mplus 28.0版和社会科学统计软件包26版对数据进行分析。
分析显示出良好的内容效度(项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)=0.83至1.0,平均内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)=0.97)和表面效度(项目表面效度指数(I-FVI)=0.87至1.0,平均表面效度指数(S-FVI/Ave)=1.02)。探索性因素分析显示七个项目分为两个领域。随后使用验证性因素分析的分析表明,七个项目的双因素模型具有可接受的拟合优度指数水平(比较拟合指数=0.999,塔克-刘易斯指数=0.999,增量拟合指数=0.987,卡方/自由度=1.039,近似均方根误差=0.011)。最后,两个领域的克朗巴哈系数均令人满意(分别为0.899和0.815)。
CoVaP工具是测量医护人员对COVID-19疫苗接种看法的有效且可靠的工具。CoVaP工具的高效度和可靠性突出了其在捕捉影响马来西亚医护人员疫苗认知的独特文化和背景因素方面的效用。了解这些因素对于设计有效的公共卫生干预措施以解决疫苗犹豫问题并提高疫苗接种率至关重要。