Roche Kailey, Pagacz Joelle, Lalumière Martin L, Seto Michael C
Royal Ottawa Health Care Group, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sex Abuse. 2025 Sep;37(6):723-755. doi: 10.1177/10790632241297270. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
Stigma-related stress may contribute to increased risk in individuals who are sexually attracted to children. Further, certain subgroups of people attracted to children may be more stigmatized than others; this has important implications for prevention programs. We conducted a vignette study to examine whether public stigma toward people attracted to children differed based on the person's gender (man/woman), the gender of the child to whom the person is attracted (boy/girl), and preferentiality (non-preferentially/preferentially attracted to children). A sample of 385 participants ( = 41; 66% White; 52% male; 57% US residents) were recruited through Prolific. Participants were randomly assigned to one of eight vignettes presenting a non-offending individual attracted to children. Vignettes varied on the person's gender, the gender of the child to whom they were attracted, and whether they were preferentially or non-preferentially attracted to children. Participants were asked to rate their perception of risk for the person to commit a child sexual offense (and give their reasoning) as well as fill out a measure of stigma regarding the person in the vignette. The only characteristic associated with perception of risk and stigma was preferentiality; participants rated preferentially attracted persons as being a higher risk to offend and endorsed higher stigma regarding that individual. Open-ended responses indicated that in rating risk to offend, participants were concerned with the role of attraction to children, characteristics of the attraction, loss of control and opportunism, lack of offense history, and lifestyle factors.
与污名相关的压力可能会增加那些被儿童性吸引的个体的风险。此外,某些被儿童吸引的人群亚组可能比其他亚组受到更多的污名化;这对预防项目具有重要意义。我们进行了一项 vignette 研究,以检验公众对被儿童吸引的人的污名是否因该人的性别(男/女)、被其吸引的儿童的性别(男孩/女孩)以及偏好性(非偏好性/偏好性被儿童吸引)而有所不同。通过 Prolific 招募了385名参与者(平均年龄 = 41岁;66%为白人;52%为男性;57%为美国居民)。参与者被随机分配到八个 vignette 中的一个,这些 vignette 呈现了一个未实施犯罪但被儿童吸引的个体。vignettes 在该人的性别、被其吸引的儿童的性别以及他们是偏好性还是非偏好性被儿童吸引方面有所不同。参与者被要求对他们认为该人实施儿童性犯罪的风险进行评分(并给出理由),以及填写一份关于 vignette 中该人的污名测量表。与风险认知和污名相关的唯一特征是偏好性;参与者将偏好性被吸引的人评为犯罪风险更高,并认可对该个体有更高的污名。开放式回答表明,在对犯罪风险进行评分时,参与者关注对儿童的吸引力的作用、吸引力的特征、失去控制和机会主义、没有犯罪历史以及生活方式因素。