Huang Xiaoran, Zeng Li, Liang Hanxiong, Li Daoyong, Yang Xin, Zhang Bo
School of Architecture and Art, North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China.
Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):26993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78041-x.
Assessing street walkability is a critical agenda in urban planning and multidisciplinary research, as it facilitates public health, community cohesion, and urban sustainability. Existing evaluation systems primarily focus on objective measurements, often neglecting subjective assessments and the diverse walking needs influenced by different urban spatial elements. This study addresses these gaps by constructing a comprehensive evaluation framework that integrates both subjective and objective dimensions, combining three neighbourhood indicators: Macro-Scale Index, Micro-Scale Index, and Street Walking Preferences Index. A normalization weighting method synthesizes these indicators into a comprehensive index. We applied this framework to assess the street environment within Beijing's Fifth Ring Road. The empirical results demonstrate that: (1) The framework reliably reflects the distribution of walkability. (2) The three indicators show both similarities and differences, underscoring the need to consider the distinct roles of community and street-level elements and the interaction between subjective and objective dimensions. (3) In high-density cities with ring-road development patterns, the Macro-Scale Index closely aligns with the Comprehensive Index, demonstrating its accuracy in reflecting walkability. The proposed framework and findings offer new insights for street walkability research and theoretical support for developing more inclusive, sustainable and walkable cities.
评估街道的可步行性是城市规划和多学科研究中的一项关键议程,因为它有助于促进公众健康、社区凝聚力和城市可持续性。现有的评估系统主要侧重于客观测量,往往忽视主观评估以及受不同城市空间要素影响的多样化步行需求。本研究通过构建一个综合评估框架来解决这些差距,该框架整合了主观和客观维度,结合了三个邻里指标:宏观尺度指数、微观尺度指数和街道步行偏好指数。一种归一化加权方法将这些指标综合成一个综合指数。我们应用这个框架来评估北京五环路以内的街道环境。实证结果表明:(1)该框架可靠地反映了可步行性的分布。(2)这三个指标既有相似之处,也有不同之处,强调了需要考虑社区和街道层面要素的不同作用以及主观和客观维度之间的相互作用。(3)在具有环路发展模式的高密度城市中,宏观尺度指数与综合指数密切相关,表明其在反映可步行性方面的准确性。所提出的框架和研究结果为街道可步行性研究提供了新的见解,并为建设更具包容性、可持续性和可步行性的城市提供了理论支持。