• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用大数据和深度学习技术对城市行人环境进行全面的步行适宜性评估。

Comprehensive walkability assessment of urban pedestrian environments using big data and deep learning techniques.

作者信息

Huang Xiaoran, Zeng Li, Liang Hanxiong, Li Daoyong, Yang Xin, Zhang Bo

机构信息

School of Architecture and Art, North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China.

Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):26993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78041-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-78041-x
PMID:39506013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11541575/
Abstract

Assessing street walkability is a critical agenda in urban planning and multidisciplinary research, as it facilitates public health, community cohesion, and urban sustainability. Existing evaluation systems primarily focus on objective measurements, often neglecting subjective assessments and the diverse walking needs influenced by different urban spatial elements. This study addresses these gaps by constructing a comprehensive evaluation framework that integrates both subjective and objective dimensions, combining three neighbourhood indicators: Macro-Scale Index, Micro-Scale Index, and Street Walking Preferences Index. A normalization weighting method synthesizes these indicators into a comprehensive index. We applied this framework to assess the street environment within Beijing's Fifth Ring Road. The empirical results demonstrate that: (1) The framework reliably reflects the distribution of walkability. (2) The three indicators show both similarities and differences, underscoring the need to consider the distinct roles of community and street-level elements and the interaction between subjective and objective dimensions. (3) In high-density cities with ring-road development patterns, the Macro-Scale Index closely aligns with the Comprehensive Index, demonstrating its accuracy in reflecting walkability. The proposed framework and findings offer new insights for street walkability research and theoretical support for developing more inclusive, sustainable and walkable cities.

摘要

评估街道的可步行性是城市规划和多学科研究中的一项关键议程,因为它有助于促进公众健康、社区凝聚力和城市可持续性。现有的评估系统主要侧重于客观测量,往往忽视主观评估以及受不同城市空间要素影响的多样化步行需求。本研究通过构建一个综合评估框架来解决这些差距,该框架整合了主观和客观维度,结合了三个邻里指标:宏观尺度指数、微观尺度指数和街道步行偏好指数。一种归一化加权方法将这些指标综合成一个综合指数。我们应用这个框架来评估北京五环路以内的街道环境。实证结果表明:(1)该框架可靠地反映了可步行性的分布。(2)这三个指标既有相似之处,也有不同之处,强调了需要考虑社区和街道层面要素的不同作用以及主观和客观维度之间的相互作用。(3)在具有环路发展模式的高密度城市中,宏观尺度指数与综合指数密切相关,表明其在反映可步行性方面的准确性。所提出的框架和研究结果为街道可步行性研究提供了新的见解,并为建设更具包容性、可持续性和可步行性的城市提供了理论支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/8ada9e431562/41598_2024_78041_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/cf72547292d4/41598_2024_78041_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/d0ee35ceb7dd/41598_2024_78041_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/ebd65400cd0d/41598_2024_78041_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/98b3d5a2245d/41598_2024_78041_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/54e02c2be8ef/41598_2024_78041_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/52658c54ebdd/41598_2024_78041_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/18062f5fef62/41598_2024_78041_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/65f89f8841a2/41598_2024_78041_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/31bc68acaf5b/41598_2024_78041_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/fe88ee597ab7/41598_2024_78041_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/764de84d930d/41598_2024_78041_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/a5cb92903c72/41598_2024_78041_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/c5f3adc9105c/41598_2024_78041_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/b73c52b3586f/41598_2024_78041_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/7242e62e49d1/41598_2024_78041_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/a70cda550702/41598_2024_78041_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/8ada9e431562/41598_2024_78041_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/cf72547292d4/41598_2024_78041_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/d0ee35ceb7dd/41598_2024_78041_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/ebd65400cd0d/41598_2024_78041_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/98b3d5a2245d/41598_2024_78041_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/54e02c2be8ef/41598_2024_78041_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/52658c54ebdd/41598_2024_78041_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/18062f5fef62/41598_2024_78041_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/65f89f8841a2/41598_2024_78041_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/31bc68acaf5b/41598_2024_78041_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/fe88ee597ab7/41598_2024_78041_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/764de84d930d/41598_2024_78041_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/a5cb92903c72/41598_2024_78041_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/c5f3adc9105c/41598_2024_78041_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/b73c52b3586f/41598_2024_78041_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/7242e62e49d1/41598_2024_78041_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/a70cda550702/41598_2024_78041_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb3/11541575/8ada9e431562/41598_2024_78041_Fig17_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive walkability assessment of urban pedestrian environments using big data and deep learning techniques.使用大数据和深度学习技术对城市行人环境进行全面的步行适宜性评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):26993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78041-x.
2
Microscale walkability indicators for fifty-nine European central urban areas: An open-access tabular dataset and a geospatial web-based platform.欧洲59个中心城市地区的微观尺度步行适宜性指标:一个开放获取的表格数据集和一个基于网络地理空间的平台。
Data Brief. 2021 Apr 21;36:107048. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107048. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
The Street Walkability and Thermal Comfort Index (SWTCI): A new assessment tool combining street design measurements and thermal comfort.街道可步行性和热舒适度指数(SWTCI):一种结合街道设计测量和热舒适度的新评估工具。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 15;795:148663. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148663. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
Measuring Neighborhood Walkable Environments: A Comparison of Three Approaches.衡量邻里适宜步行的环境:三种方法的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 3;14(6):593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060593.
5
Developing a research and practice tool to measure walkability: a demonstration project.开发一种用于衡量步行便利性的研究与实践工具:一个示范项目。
Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Dec;25(3):160-6. doi: 10.1071/HE14050.
6
Development of a novel walkability index for London, United Kingdom: cross-sectional application to the Whitehall II Study.英国伦敦新型步行适宜性指数的开发:怀特霍尔二期研究的横断面应用
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 18;16:416. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3012-2.
7
Predicting walking-to-work using street-level imagery and deep learning in seven Canadian cities.使用街景图像和深度学习在加拿大七个城市预测步行上班。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 1;12(1):18380. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22630-1.
8
Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening-A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao.基于街道绿化的步行得分优化——以青岛市中山路为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 31;18(3):1277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031277.
9
Walkability, complete streets, and gender: Who benefits most?可步行性、完整街道与性别:谁受益最大?
Health Place. 2017 Nov;48:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.007.
10
Walkability assessment of metro catchment area: A machine learning method based on the fusion of subject-objective perspectives.地铁集水区的可达性评估:基于主客观融合的机器学习方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;10:1086277. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086277. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel framework integrating GeoAI and human perceptions to estimate walkability in Wuhan, China.一种将地理人工智能(GeoAI)与人类认知相结合以评估中国武汉步行适宜性的新型框架。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09779-1.
2
A BIM-GIS Framework Integrated with CCTV Analytics for Urban Walkability Assessment.一种集成闭路电视分析的BIM-GIS框架用于城市步行适宜性评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 10;25(12):3637. doi: 10.3390/s25123637.
3
Social media interaction and built environment effects on urban walking experience: A machine learning analysis of Shanghai Citywalk.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating street view images and deep learning to explore the association between human perceptions of the built environment and cardiovascular disease in older adults.将街景图像与深度学习相结合,探索老年人对建筑环境感知与心血管疾病之间的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116304. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116304. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
2
Assessment of the supply/demand balance of medical resources in Beijing from the perspective of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment.从分级诊疗角度评估北京地区医疗资源的供需平衡状况。
Geospat Health. 2023 Oct 13;18(2). doi: 10.4081/gh.2023.1228.
3
Effect of roadside trees on pedestrians' psychological evaluation of traffic noise.
社交媒体互动与建成环境对城市步行体验的影响:上海市城市漫步的机器学习分析
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0320951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320951. eCollection 2025.
路边树木对行人交通噪音心理评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1166318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166318. eCollection 2023.
4
Neighborhood walkability, neighborhood social health, and self-selection among U.S. adults.美国成年人的邻里可达性、邻里社会健康和自我选择。
Health Place. 2023 Jul;82:103036. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103036. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Older adults' community participation, physical activity, and social interactions during and following COVID-19 restrictions in Australia: a mixed methods approach.澳大利亚老年人在 COVID-19 限制期间和之后的社区参与、身体活动和社会互动:混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15093-0.
6
Mapping essential urban land use categories in China (EULUC-China): preliminary results for 2018.中国基本城市土地利用类别测绘(EULUC-中国):2018年初步结果
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2020 Feb 15;65(3):182-187. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.12.007. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
7
Perceived Safety and Pedestrian Performance in Pedestrian Priority Streets (PPSs) in Seoul, Korea: A Virtual Reality Experiment and Trace Mapping.韩国首尔行人优先街道(PPSs)中行人感知安全与行为表现:虚拟现实实验与轨迹映射。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;18(5):2501. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052501.
8
Objective scoring of streetscape walkability related to leisure walking: Statistical modeling approach with semantic segmentation of Google Street View images.与休闲步行相关的街道景观可步行性的客观评分:基于谷歌街景图像语义分割的统计建模方法
Health Place. 2020 Nov;66:102428. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102428. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Socio-economic, built environment, and mobility conditions associated with crime: a study of multiple cities.社会经济、建筑环境和流动条件与犯罪相关:对多个城市的研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 17;10(1):13871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70808-2.
10
Nature doesn't judge you - how urban nature supports young people's mental health and wellbeing in a diverse UK city.自然不会评判你——城市自然如何在多元化的英国城市中支持年轻人的心理健康和幸福感。
Health Place. 2020 Mar;62:102296. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102296. Epub 2020 Feb 21.