Norha Jooa, Suorsa Kristin, Heinonen Olli J, Niiranen Teemu, Kalliokoski Kari K, Heinonen Ilkka H A, Stenholm Sari
Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, FINLAND.
Paavo Nurmi Centre and Unit for Health and Physical Activity, University of Turku, Turku, FINLAND.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Mar 1;57(3):625-631. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003594. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
The associations between work time, leisure-time, and non-workday physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SED), and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) are not well known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the associations between domain-specific activity behavior and 24-h BP.
A hundred fifty-six aging workers (mean age, 62.4 (SD 1.0) yr; body mass index, 26.2 (4.5) kg·m -2 ; 84% women; 75% nonmanual occupation) from the Finnish Retirement and Aging study were included. Standing, light and moderate-to-vigorous PA, and SED were measured using thigh-worn accelerometers and work time, leisure-time, and non-workdays were distinguished using a diary. Ambulatory 24-h BP was analyzed as mean daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic BP, and the nocturnal BP dipping percentage was calculated. Associations were examined with linear regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, occupation, work time mode, job strain, body mass index, BP medication, and accelerometer wear time.
Higher work time SED was associated with lower nighttime diastolic BP ( B = -0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.83 to -0.01). In addition, higher work time standing was associated with higher daytime diastolic BP ( B = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.65), and higher work time light PA was associated with less diastolic BP dipping ( B = -3.57; 95% CI, -6.80 to -0.34). Moderate-to-vigorous PA in any domain was not associated with ambulatory BP.
Higher work time SED was associated with a more favorable diastolic BP, and higher work time PA was associated with more adverse diastolic BP among aging workers. In conclusion, work time, rather than leisure time or non-workday, activity behavior seems to be associated with 24-h ambulatory BP.
工作时间、休闲时间及非工作日的身体活动(PA)与久坐行为(SED)以及24小时动态血压(BP)之间的关联尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是评估特定领域活动行为与24小时血压之间的关联。
纳入了芬兰退休与老龄化研究中的156名老年工作者(平均年龄62.4(标准差1.0)岁;体重指数26.2(4.5)kg·m-2;84%为女性;75%从事非体力工作)。使用大腿佩戴式加速度计测量站立、轻度和中度至剧烈身体活动以及久坐行为,并通过日记区分工作时间、休闲时间和非工作日。将动态24小时血压分析为日间和夜间平均收缩压和舒张压,并计算夜间血压下降百分比。通过线性回归分析检验关联,并对年龄、性别、职业、工作时间模式、工作压力、体重指数、血压药物治疗和加速度计佩戴时间进行调整。
工作时间久坐行为较多与夜间舒张压较低相关(B=-0.92;95%置信区间(CI),-1.83至-0.01)。此外,工作时间站立较多与日间舒张压较高相关(B=1.34;95%CI,0.03至2.65),工作时间轻度身体活动较多与舒张压下降较少相关(B=-3.57;95%CI,-6.80至-0.34)。任何领域的中度至剧烈身体活动与动态血压均无关联。
在老年工作者中,工作时间久坐行为较多与舒张压更有利相关,工作时间身体活动较多与舒张压更不利相关。总之,似乎是工作时间而非休闲时间或非工作日的活动行为与24小时动态血压相关。