Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA.
Departments of Health and Human Development, School of Education University of Pittsburgh PA USA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e029999. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029999. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
Background There are no recommendations for being seated versus nonseated during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM). The authors examined how recent standing or moving versus sitting affect average daytime BP on ABPM. Methods and Results This analysis used baseline assessments from a clinical trial in desk workers with office systolic BP (SBP) 120 to 159 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) 80 to 99 mm Hg. ABPM was measured every 30 minutes with a SunTech Medical Oscar 2 monitor. Concurrent posture (standing or seated) and moving (steps) were measured via a thigh-worn accelerometer. Linear regression determined within-person BP variability explained () by standing and steps before ABPM readings. Mean daytime BP and the prevalence of mean daytime BP >135/85 mm Hg from readings after sitting (seated) or after recent standing or moving (nonseated) were compared with all readings. Participants (n=266, 59% women; age, 45.2±11.6 years) provided 32.5±3.9 daytime BP readings. Time standing and steps before readings explained variability up to 17% for daytime SBP and 14% for daytime DBP. Using the 5-minute prior interval, seated SBP/DBP was lower (130.8/79.7 mm Hg, <0.001) and nonseated SBP/DBP was higher (137.8/84.3 mm Hg, <0.001) than mean daytime SBP/DBP from all readings (133.9/81.6 mm Hg). The prevalence of mean daytime SBP/DBP ≥135/85 mm Hg also differed: 38.7% from seated readings, 70.3% from nonseated readings, and 52.6% from all readings (<0.05). Conclusions Daytime BP was systematically higher after standing and moving compared with being seated. Individual variation in activity patterns could influence the diagnosis of high BP using daytime BP readings on ABPM.
在动态血压监测(ABPM)期间,对于坐姿与非坐姿的选择,目前尚无推荐意见。作者研究了最近的站立或活动与坐立位对 ABPM 平均日间血压的影响。
本分析使用了一项针对办公室收缩压(SBP)为 120 至 159mmHg 或舒张压(DBP)为 80 至 99mmHg 的办公室工作人员的临床试验中的基线评估。使用 SunTech Medical Oscar 2 监测仪每 30 分钟测量一次 ABPM。通过大腿佩戴的加速度计同步测量体位(站立或坐姿)和活动(步数)。线性回归确定了 ABPM 读数前站立和步数对个体内 BP 变异性的解释(%)。比较了读数后坐立位(坐姿)或最近站立或活动(非坐姿)后平均日间血压(BP)以及从所有读数中得出的平均日间 BP >135/85mmHg 的患病率。参与者(n=266,59%为女性;年龄,45.2±11.6 岁)提供了 32.5±3.9 个日间 BP 读数。在进行读数之前,站立和步数解释了日间 SBP 和 DBP 最高可达 17%和 14%的变异性。使用 5 分钟前的间隔,坐姿 SBP/DBP 较低(130.8/79.7mmHg,<0.001),而非坐姿 SBP/DBP 较高(137.8/84.3mmHg,<0.001),而从所有读数中得出的平均日间 SBP/DBP 较高(133.9/81.6mmHg)。平均日间 SBP/DBP≥135/85mmHg 的患病率也存在差异:坐姿读数为 38.7%,非坐姿读数为 70.3%,所有读数为 52.6%(<0.05)。
与坐立位相比,站立和活动后日间 BP 会系统性升高。使用 ABPM 日间 BP 读数诊断高血压时,活动模式的个体差异可能会产生影响。