Suppr超能文献

频繁活动休息打断长时间坐姿对接受持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗的1型糖尿病成人餐后血糖和胰岛素敏感性的影响:一项随机交叉试点试验。

Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.

作者信息

Larsen Robyn, Taylor Frances, Dempsey Paddy C, McNarry Melitta, Rickards Kym, Sethi Parneet, Homer Ashleigh, Cohen Neale, Owen Neville, Kumareswaran Kavita, MacIsaac Richard, McAuley Sybil A, O'Neal David, Dunstan David W

机构信息

Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2025 Feb;27(2):101-112. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0146. Epub 2024 Nov 7.

Abstract

This study examined acute effects of interrupting prolonged sitting with short activity breaks on postprandial glucose/insulin responses and estimations of insulin sensitivity in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). In a randomized crossover trial, eight adults (age = 46 ± 14 years [mean ± SD], body mass index [BMI] = 27.2 ± 3.8 kg/m) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy completed two 6-h conditions as follows: uninterrupted sitting (SIT) and sitting interrupted with 3-min bouts of simple resistance activities (SRAs) every 30 min. Basal and bolus insulin were standardized across conditions except in cases of hypoglycemia. Postprandial responses were assessed using incremental area-under-the-curve (iAUC) and total AUC (tAUC) from half-hourly venous sampling. Meal-based insulin sensitivity determined from glucose sensor and insulin pump (S) was assessed from flash continuous glucose monitor and insulin pump data. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed models adjusted for sex, BMI, treatment order, and preprandial values. Glucose iAUC did not differ by condition (SIT: 19.8 ± 3.0 [estimated marginal means ± standard error] vs. SRA: 14.4 ± 3.0 mmol.6 h.L; = 0.086). Despite CSII being standardized between conditions, insulin iAUC was higher in SRA compared to SIT (137.1 ± 22.7 vs. 170.9 ± 22.7 mU.6 h.L; < 0.001). This resulted in a lower glucose response relative to the change in plasma insulin in SRA (tAUCglu/tAUCins: 0.32 ± 0.02 vs. 0.40 ± 0.02 mmol.mU; = 0.03). Si was also higher at dinner following the SRA condition, with no between-condition differences at breakfast or lunch. Regularly interrupting prolonged sitting in T1D may increase plasma insulin and improve insulin sensitivity when meals and CSII are standardized. Future studies should explore underlying mechanistic determinants and the applicability of findings to those on multiple daily injections. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Identifier-ACTRN12618000126213 (www.anzctr.org.au).

摘要

本研究探讨了通过短暂活动中断长时间久坐对1型糖尿病(T1D)成人餐后血糖/胰岛素反应及胰岛素敏感性评估的急性影响。在一项随机交叉试验中,8名接受持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)治疗的成年人(年龄 = 46 ± 14岁[均值±标准差],体重指数[BMI] = 27.2 ± 3.8 kg/m²)完成了如下两种6小时的情况:不间断久坐(SIT)和每隔30分钟被3分钟简单阻力活动(SRA)打断的久坐。除低血糖情况外,基础胰岛素和大剂量胰岛素在不同情况下均进行了标准化。餐后反应通过每半小时静脉采血的增量曲线下面积(iAUC)和总曲线下面积(tAUC)进行评估。基于葡萄糖传感器和胰岛素泵测定的餐时胰岛素敏感性(S)通过闪光连续血糖监测仪和胰岛素泵数据进行评估。使用针对性别、BMI、治疗顺序和餐前值进行调整的混合模型对结果进行分析。葡萄糖iAUC在不同情况下无差异(SIT:19.8 ± 3.0[估计边际均值±标准误] vs. SRA:14.4 ± 3.0 mmol·6 h·L⁻¹;P = 0.086)。尽管CSII在不同情况下进行了标准化,但与SIT相比,SRA中的胰岛素iAUC更高(137.1 ± 22.7 vs. 170.9 ± 22.7 mU·6 h·L⁻¹;P < 0.001)。这导致SRA中相对于血浆胰岛素变化的葡萄糖反应更低(tAUCglu/tAUCins:0.32 ± 0.02 vs. 0.40 ± 0.02 mmol·mU⁻¹;P = 0.03)。SRA情况后的晚餐时S也更高,早餐或午餐时不同情况间无差异。在T1D中定期打断长时间久坐,在餐食和CSII标准化时可能会增加血浆胰岛素并改善胰岛素敏感性。未来研究应探索潜在的机制决定因素以及这些发现对每日多次注射胰岛素者的适用性。澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册标识符 - ACTRN12618000126213(www.anzctr.org.au)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验