Cea Ignacio, Negro Niccolo, Signorelli Camilo Miguel
Center for Research, Innovation and Creation, and Faculty of Religious Sciences and Philosophy, Temuco Catholic University, Temuco, Chile.
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy and Humanities, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 23;15:1485433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1485433. eCollection 2024.
In this article we present two ontological problems for the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness 4.0: what we call the (i) the intrinsicality 2.0 problem, and (ii) the engineering problem. These problems entail that truly existing, conscious entities can depend on, and be engineered from, entities that do not objectively exist, which is problematic: if something does not exist in objective reality (i.e., in itself, independently of another entity's consciousness), then it seems that it cannot be part of the material basis and determinants of other entities that do exist on their own. We argue that the core origin of these problems lies in IIT's equation between true existence and phenomenal existence (consciousness), and the corresponding ontological exclusion of non-conscious physical entities (i.e., extrinsic entities) from objective reality. In short, these two problems seem to show that IIT should reconsider the ontological status of these extrinsic entities, because they need to exist objectively to account for the ontological implications of the scenarios we present here, which are permitted by the operational framework of the theory.
在本文中,我们针对意识整合信息理论4.0提出两个本体论问题:我们称之为(i)内在性2.0问题,以及(ii)工程问题。这些问题意味着,真正存在的有意识实体可能依赖于并非客观存在的实体,并由这些实体构建而成,这是有问题的:如果某个事物在客观现实中不存在(即其自身独立于其他实体的意识而不存在),那么它似乎就不可能成为自身独立存在的其他实体的物质基础和决定因素的一部分。我们认为,这些问题的核心根源在于意识整合信息理论将真实存在与现象存在(意识)等同起来,并相应地将非意识物理实体(即外在实体)从客观现实中进行了本体论上的排除。简而言之,这两个问题似乎表明,意识整合信息理论应该重新考虑这些外在实体的本体论地位,因为它们需要客观存在,才能解释我们在此提出的、该理论的操作框架所允许的那些场景的本体论含义。