• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在ISTIFAR的龙目岛研究中,新冠疫情略微降低了家庭恢复力、应对能力和灾害防范能力。

COVID-19 slightly reduced family resilience, coping, and disaster preparedness in ISTIFAR's Lombok study.

作者信息

Sriyono Sriyono, Zulkarnain Hakim, Proboningsih Jujuk, Kurnia Kiki A

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Department of Nursing, Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

出版信息

Jamba. 2024 Oct 22;16(1):1696. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1696. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1696
PMID:39507564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11538347/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal impact of ISTIFAR programme (Islamic-Based Training for Family Resilience) to the family state of coping, resilience and disaster preparedness on longitudinal observation. A quasi-experimental design was employed with pre- and post-test intervention group only. The sample size was 63 families that survived the earthquake, which sampled using purposive sampling. The sampling criteria were disaster survivor, head of household, Muslim and mentally healthy. The variable was pre- and post-observation of coping, family resilience and disaster preparedness, with confounding factor of stress. The interview performed by structured questionnaire. The data analysed with Mann-Whitney U test and ordinal regression (α < 0.05). The result was a statistical difference between the observation of 6 months prior and follow-up but a slight decline in all variables mean. In detail, coping ( = 0.000), family resilience ( = 0.000) and the disaster preparedness ( = 0.023). There was no statistical correlation between the coping, family resilience and the disaster preparedness towards pandemic stress ( = 0.747). Islamic-Based Training for Family Resilience positively impact coping, resilience and disaster preparedness, albeit slight declines over 6 months, but no evident correlation with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stress.

CONTRIBUTION

This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the effectiveness of authentic disaster preparedness facilitated through ISTIFAR among vulnerable families. It suggests that enhancing resilience, particularly concerning disaster preparedness and, notably, amids the COVID-19 pandemic, can be achieved through authentic local methodologies. The grounded approach proves beneficial, indicating that interventions within communities should not be universally applicable but tailored to leverage local community wisdom.

摘要

未标注

本研究旨在通过纵向观察评估ISTIFAR项目(基于伊斯兰教的家庭复原力培训)对家庭应对状态、复原力和备灾能力的纵向影响。采用仅设置干预组前后测的准实验设计。样本量为63个在地震中幸存的家庭,采用目的抽样法进行抽样。抽样标准为灾难幸存者、户主、穆斯林且心理健康。变量为应对、家庭复原力和备灾能力的前后观察值,压力为混杂因素。通过结构化问卷进行访谈。数据采用曼-惠特尼U检验和有序回归分析(α < 0.05)。结果显示,6个月前观察值与随访值之间存在统计学差异,但所有变量均值略有下降。具体而言,应对能力(= 0.000)、家庭复原力(= 0.000)和备灾能力(= 0.023)。应对能力、家庭复原力和备灾能力与大流行压力之间无统计学相关性(= 0.747)。基于伊斯兰教的家庭复原力培训对应对能力、复原力和备灾能力有积极影响,尽管6个月内略有下降,但与2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行压力无明显相关性。

贡献

本研究通过强调ISTIFAR在弱势家庭中促进真实备灾的有效性,为现有知识体系做出了贡献。研究表明,通过真实的地方方法可以提高复原力,特别是在备灾方面,尤其是在COVID-19大流行期间。扎根方法被证明是有益的,这表明社区内的干预措施不应普遍适用,而应根据当地社区智慧进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114a/11538347/68996d31caad/JAMBA-16-1696-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114a/11538347/68996d31caad/JAMBA-16-1696-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/114a/11538347/68996d31caad/JAMBA-16-1696-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 slightly reduced family resilience, coping, and disaster preparedness in ISTIFAR's Lombok study.在ISTIFAR的龙目岛研究中,新冠疫情略微降低了家庭恢复力、应对能力和灾害防范能力。
Jamba. 2024 Oct 22;16(1):1696. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1696. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors affecting household disaster preparedness in South Korea.影响韩国家庭灾害准备的因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 4;17(10):e0275540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275540. eCollection 2022.
3
An integrated approach to mental health and disaster preparedness: a cluster comparison with earthquake affected communities in Nepal.心理健康与灾害准备的综合方法:尼泊尔地震灾区的群组比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1863-z.
4
A Community Mental Health Integrated Disaster Preparedness Intervention for Bushfire Recovery in Rural Australian Communities: Protocol for a Multimethods Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study.农村澳大利亚社区丛林大火灾后恢复的社区精神卫生综合备灾干预措施:多方法可行性和可接受性初步研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 4;13:e53454. doi: 10.2196/53454.
5
Explaining Disaster and Pandemic Preparedness at the Nexus of Personal Resilience and Social Vulnerability: An Exploratory Study.解释个人韧性和社会脆弱性交汇处的灾害和大流行病防范:一项探索性研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023 Jun 19;17:e416. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2023.78.
6
Psychological preparedness for pandemic (COVID-19) management: Perceptions of nurses and nursing students in India.应对大流行(COVID-19)的心理准备:印度护士和护理学生的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 13;16(8):e0255772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255772. eCollection 2021.
7
What Do You Mean by Community Resilience? More Assets or Better Prepared?社区韧性是什么意思?更多资产还是更好的准备?
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Apr;16(2):706-713. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.466. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Training on modified model of programme for enhancement of emergency response flood preparedness based on the local wisdom of Jambi community.基于占碑社区当地智慧的应急响应洪水防备强化计划改进模型培训。
Jamba. 2019 Aug 20;11(1):801. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.801. eCollection 2019.
9
Impact of a training program on disaster preparedness among paramedic students of a tertiary care hospital of North India: A single-group, before-after intervention study.印度北部一家三级护理医院护理专业学生的培训项目对灾难准备的影响:一项单组前后干预研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Jan 30;9:5. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_423_19. eCollection 2020.
10
Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar.缅甸仰光家庭层面的灾害防范与恢复力
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;112(2):1273-1294. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05226-w. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
An analysis of the vulnerability of informal and formal households to disaster risks in the Rand West City region.兰德西部城市地区非正式和正式家庭对灾害风险的脆弱性分析。
Jamba. 2024 May 23;16(1):1589. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1589. eCollection 2024.
2
Family Functioning and Community Resilience During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period in Turkey.土耳其 COVID-19 封锁期间的家庭功能和社区韧性。
Soc Work Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;38(5-8):437-449. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2024.2315186. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
3
Community behavioral change and management of COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Indonesia.
社区行为改变与新冠疫情管理:来自印度尼西亚的证据
J King Saud Univ Sci. 2023 Feb;35(2):102451. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102451. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
4
Rethinking disaster utopia: the limits of conspicuous resilience for community-based recovery and adaptation.反思灾难乌托邦:基于社区的恢复和适应中显著弹性的局限性。
Disasters. 2023 Jul;47(3):608-629. doi: 10.1111/disa.12567. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
5
Stability of resilience in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间韧性的稳定性。
Personal Ment Health. 2023 Feb;17(1):55-66. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1560. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
Religious/spiritual struggles and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Does "talking religion" help or hurt?新冠疫情期间的宗教/精神挣扎与幸福感:“谈论宗教”是有益还是有害?
Rev Relig Res. 2022;64(2):249-278. doi: 10.1007/s13644-022-00487-0. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
7
Resilience after natural disasters: the process of harnessing resources in communities differentially exposed to a flood.自然灾害后的韧性:在不同程度暴露于洪水中的社区中利用资源的过程。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Mar 18;12(1):1891733. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1891733. eCollection 2021.
8
Stress and Coping in the Time of Covid-19: Pathways to Resilience and Recovery.新冠疫情时期的压力与应对:恢复力和康复之路
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Apr;17(2):59-62. doi: 10.36131/CN20200204.
9
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review.COVID-19 大流行对普通人群心理健康的影响:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Applying an Innovative Model of Disaster Resilience at the Neighborhood Level : The COPEWELL New York City Experience.应用邻里层面的灾害韧性创新模式:COPEWELL 纽约市经验。
Public Health Rep. 2020 Sep/Oct;135(5):565-570. doi: 10.1177/0033354920938012. Epub 2020 Jul 31.