Suppr超能文献

使用人工智能辅助迭代算法协议的膝关节磁共振成像协议的可行性:与标准MRI协议的比较。

Feasibility of knee magnetic resonance imaging protocol using artificial intelligence-assisted iterative algorithm protocols: comparison with standard MRI protocols.

作者信息

Liu Hailong, Chen Yanxia, Zhang Meng, Bu Han, Lin Fenghuan, Chen Jun, Xiao Mengqiang, Chen Jie

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Zhuhai Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China.

Department of Radiology, Qujing Second People's Hospital, Qujing, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 23;11:1480196. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1480196. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of AI-assisted iterative algorithm protocols (AIIA) in accelerated fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus standard (SD) fast spin-echo MRI for clinical 3.0 T rapid knee scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The accelerated sequence, which includes fat-suppression proton density-weighted imaging (FS-PDWI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), was used in conjunction with the SD sequence in 61 patients who underwent MRI scans. SD images were processed using standard reconstruction techniques, while accelerated images utilized AIIA reconstruction. Quantitative assessments of image quality were conducted, measuring noise levels, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast signal-to-noise ratio (CNR). Additionally, subjective evaluations were performed using a Likert five-point scale to assess image quality.

RESULTS

The SD group completed the entire knee scan in 466 s, while the AIIA group completed the scan in 312 s. Compared to the SD group, the AIIA group had a noticeably higher SNR of T1WI in the femur and subpatellar fat pad ( = 0.04, 0.001). On the other hand, T2WI femur SNR was noticeably higher in the SD group ( = 0.004). Measurements of SNR, CNR and other noise levels showed no statistically significant changes. Compared to the SD group, the AIIA group had significantly higher subjective image quality scores for every sequence ( < 0.05). There was a modest to large intraclass correlation value (ICC = 0.65-0.90) for the anomalies that were examined among readers. Both the AIIA and SD procedures were shown to have comparable diagnostic performance for meniscal and cruciate ligament rupture ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Images processed using AIIA reconstruction were acquired faster while maintaining comparable image quality and diagnostic capability, meeting the requirements for clinical diagnosis.

摘要

目的

评估人工智能辅助迭代算法协议(AIIA)在3.0 T临床快速膝关节扫描的加速快速自旋回波磁共振成像(MRI)中与标准(SD)快速自旋回波MRI相比的图像质量和诊断性能。

材料与方法

对61例接受MRI扫描的患者,将包括脂肪抑制质子密度加权成像(FS-PDWI)、T2加权成像(T2WI)和T1加权成像(T1WI)的加速序列与SD序列联合使用。SD图像采用标准重建技术处理,而加速图像采用AIIA重建。对图像质量进行定量评估,测量噪声水平、信噪比(SNR)和对比信噪比(CNR)。此外,使用李克特五点量表进行主观评估以评估图像质量。

结果

SD组完成全膝关节扫描用时466秒,而AIIA组用时312秒。与SD组相比,AIIA组股骨和髌下脂肪垫的T1WI信噪比明显更高(P = 0.04,0.001)。另一方面,SD组的T2WI股骨信噪比明显更高(P = 0.004)。SNR、CNR和其他噪声水平的测量结果显示无统计学显著变化。与SD组相比,AIIA组每个序列的主观图像质量评分均显著更高(P < 0.05)。读者间对所检查异常的组内相关值为中等至较大(ICC = 0.65 - 0.90)。AIIA和SD程序在半月板和交叉韧带断裂方面均显示出相当的诊断性能(P > 0.05)。

结论

使用AIIA重建处理的图像获取速度更快,同时保持了相当的图像质量和诊断能力,满足临床诊断要求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98e2/11537882/97aa79a763e8/fmed-11-1480196-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验