Suppr超能文献

一项关于短语结构和主语孤岛违反的功能磁共振成像研究。

A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Phrase Structure and Subject Island Violations.

作者信息

Matchin William, Almeida Diogo, Hickok Gregory, Sprouse Jon

机构信息

University of South Carolina.

New York University Abu Dhabi.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Feb 1;37(2):414-442. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02266.

Abstract

In principle, functional neuroimaging provides uniquely informative data in addressing linguistic questions, because it can indicate distinct processes that are not apparent from behavioral data alone. This could involve adjudicating the source of unacceptability via the different patterns of elicited brain responses to different ungrammatical sentence types. However, it is difficult to interpret brain activations to syntactic violations. Such responses could reflect processes that have nothing intrinsically related to linguistic representations, such as domain-general executive function abilities. To facilitate the potential use of functional neuroimaging methods to identify the source of different syntactic violations, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment to identify the brain activation maps associated with two distinct syntactic violation types: phrase structure (created by inverting the order of two adjacent words within a sentence) and subject islands (created by extracting a wh-phrase out of an embedded subject). The comparison of these violations to control sentences surprisingly showed no indication of a generalized violation response, with almost completely divergent activation patterns. Phrase structure violations seemingly activated regions previously implicated in verbal working memory and structural complexity in sentence processing, whereas the subject islands appeared to activate regions previously implicated in conceptual-semantic processing, broadly defined. We review our findings in the context of previous research on syntactic and semantic violations using ERPs. Although our results suggest potentially distinct underlying mechanisms underlying phrase structure and subject island violations, our results are tentative and suggest important methodological considerations for future research in this area.

摘要

原则上,功能神经成像在解决语言问题时能提供独特的信息丰富的数据,因为它可以指出仅从行为数据中不明显的不同过程。这可能涉及通过对不同不合语法的句子类型引发的大脑反应的不同模式来判定不可接受性的来源。然而,很难解释大脑对句法违规的激活情况。这样的反应可能反映的是与语言表征没有内在联系的过程,比如领域通用的执行功能能力。为了促进功能神经成像方法在识别不同句法违规来源方面的潜在应用,我们进行了一项功能磁共振成像实验,以识别与两种不同句法违规类型相关的大脑激活图:短语结构(通过颠倒句子中两个相邻单词的顺序产生)和主语孤岛(通过从嵌入的主语中提取一个wh短语产生)。将这些违规情况与对照句子进行比较,令人惊讶的是,没有显示出普遍违规反应的迹象,激活模式几乎完全不同。短语结构违规似乎激活了先前与言语工作记忆和句子处理中的结构复杂性有关的区域,而主语孤岛似乎激活了先前与广义概念语义处理有关的区域。我们在先前使用事件相关电位对句法和语义违规进行研究的背景下回顾我们的发现。虽然我们的结果表明短语结构和主语孤岛违规可能有不同的潜在机制,但我们的结果是初步的,并为该领域未来的研究提出了重要的方法学考虑。

相似文献

1
A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Phrase Structure and Subject Island Violations.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Feb 1;37(2):414-442. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02266.
2
An fMRI study of phrase structure and subject island violations.
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 8:2024.05.05.592579. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.05.592579.
4
Syntactic and semantic modulation of neural activity during auditory sentence comprehension.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):665-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.4.665.
5
Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: evidence from an fMRI study.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3254-66. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00040. Epub 2011 May 10.
6
Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:507-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
8
An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing.
Brain Res. 2007 Jul 16;1158:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.082. Epub 2007 May 21.
9
Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.
Brain Res. 2006 Feb 3;1071(1):186-96. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.085. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
10
Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: a brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish.
Brain Res. 2006 Jun 6;1093(1):178-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.094. Epub 2006 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Lexico-semantics obscures lexical syntax.
Front Lang Sci. 2023;2. doi: 10.3389/flang.2023.1217837. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Composition is the Core Driver of the Language-selective Network.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020 Mar 1;1(1):104-134. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00005. eCollection 2020.
3
No evidence of theory of mind reasoning in the human language network.
Cereb Cortex. 2023 May 9;33(10):6299-6319. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac505.
4
The Cortical Organization of Syntactic Processing Is Supramodal: Evidence from American Sign Language.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;34(2):224-235. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01790.
5
Functional differentiation in the language network revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 15;247:118778. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118778. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
6
Multiple dimensions underlying the functional organization of the language network.
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 1;241:118444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118444. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
7
Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction.
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104293. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
The Cortical Organization of Syntax.
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):1481-1498. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz180.
9
The neural basis of combinatory syntax and semantics.
Science. 2019 Oct 4;366(6461):62-66. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0050.
10
Gradients of structure-function tethering across neocortex.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):21219-21227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903403116. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验