Ruf Alea, Ahrens Kira F, Gruber Judith R, Neumann Rebecca J, Kollmann Bianca, Kalisch Raffael, Lieb Klaus, Tüscher Oliver, Plichta Michael M, Nöthlings Ute, Ebner-Priemer Ulrich, Reif Andreas, Matura Silke
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz.
Am Psychol. 2025 Feb-Mar;80(2):180-192. doi: 10.1037/amp0001423. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
Adverse life experiences are associated with an increased risk of mental disorders. The successful adaptation to adversity and maintenance or quick restoration of mental health despite adversity is referred to as resilience. Identifying factors that promote resilience can contribute to the prevention of mental disorders. Lifestyle behaviors, increasingly recognized for their impact on mental health, are discussed as potential resilience factors. Several studies found that healthy eating and physical activity (PA) are positively associated with resilience. However, most of these studies assessed resilience through questionnaires, which is unsatisfactory given that resilience research is moving toward conceptualizing resilience as the outcome of a dynamic process, which can only be assessed prospectively and longitudinally. The present study is the first to assess the relationship between diet quality, PA, sedentary behavior (SB), and resilience, captured prospectively and longitudinally in a sample of 145 individuals (75.17% female; = 28.88, = 7.80; = 24.11, = 3.97). Resilience was assessed as the relationship between stressor exposure and mental health (i.e., the stressor reactivity score: higher scores indicate lower resilience and vice versa). Diet quality (i.e., the Healthy Eating Index) was assessed on the basis of app-based food records and 24-hr dietary recalls. PA and SB were objectively recorded through accelerometers. Regression analysis showed that neither diet quality nor PA and SB predicted resilience (s > .30). Profound differences in the conceptualization and operationalization of resilience might explain the contrary findings. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to replicate the findings of the present study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
不良生活经历与精神障碍风险增加有关。成功适应逆境并在逆境中维持或快速恢复心理健康被称为心理韧性。识别促进心理韧性的因素有助于预防精神障碍。生活方式行为因其对心理健康的影响而日益受到认可,被作为潜在的心理韧性因素进行讨论。多项研究发现,健康饮食和身体活动与心理韧性呈正相关。然而,这些研究大多通过问卷调查来评估心理韧性,鉴于心理韧性研究正朝着将心理韧性概念化为一个动态过程的结果发展,而这只能通过前瞻性和纵向研究来评估,所以这种方法并不令人满意。本研究首次前瞻性和纵向地评估了145名个体(75.17%为女性;年龄均值 = 28.88岁,标准差 = 7.80;体重指数均值 = 24.11,标准差 = 3.97)样本中饮食质量、身体活动、久坐行为与心理韧性之间的关系。心理韧性被评估为应激源暴露与心理健康之间的关系(即应激源反应性得分:得分越高表明心理韧性越低,反之亦然)。饮食质量(即健康饮食指数)基于应用程序记录的食物摄入和24小时饮食回顾进行评估。身体活动和久坐行为通过加速度计客观记录。回归分析表明,饮食质量、身体活动和久坐行为均未预测心理韧性(p值 > .30)。心理韧性在概念化和操作化方面的深刻差异可能解释了这些相反的研究结果。需要进行前瞻性纵向研究来重复本研究的结果。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)