Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌颈部放疗后食管鳞状细胞癌的管理:食管切除术仍是一种可行的选择。

Managing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after cervical radiotherapy for a head and neck cancer: esophagectomy remains a viable option.

作者信息

Liu Chia, Lan Tien-Li, Tsai Ping-Chung, Chien Ling-I, Huang Chien-Sheng, Huang Pin-I, Hsu Po-Kuei

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2025 Jan 7;38(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae099.

Abstract

Managing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in patients with a history of cervical radiotherapy for a head and neck cancer (HNC) often requires a careful evaluation of esophagectomy due to concerns regarding complications and prognosis. This study evaluates the periesophagectomy and oncological outcomes of such patients. Patients diagnosed with ESCC between January 2010 and August 2023 and who had undergone esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of a history of radiotherapy for as HNC. After 1: 2 propensity score matching, the perioperative and oncological outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were evaluated. A total of 481 patients, 32 in group 1 and 449 in group 2, were included. After matching, group 1 patients and 64 patients in the group 2 were analyzed. All the patients in group 1 were males, and their mean age was 56 years. The median radiation dose was 69 Gy. The rates of anastomosis leakage, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and reoperation were comparable between the two groups. However, vocal cord palsy occurred more frequently in group 1, particularly in those with recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection (37.5%). The 3-year OS (69.6% vs. 75.2%; p = 0.26) and RFS (50.8% vs. 55.9%; p = 0.63) were similar between groups 1 and 2. In conclusion, perioperative and oncological outcomes were comparable between ESCC patients with and without prior HNC radiotherapy, supporting esophagectomy as a feasible option.

摘要

对于有头颈部癌(HNC)颈部放疗史的患者,由于担心并发症和预后,管理食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)通常需要对食管切除术进行仔细评估。本研究评估了这类患者的食管周围切除术及肿瘤学结局。回顾性分析了2010年1月至2023年8月期间诊断为ESCC且接受了颈部吻合食管切除术的患者。根据是否有HNC放疗史将患者分为两组(1组有放疗史,2组无放疗史)。经过1:2倾向评分匹配后,评估围手术期和肿瘤学结局,包括总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。共纳入481例患者,1组32例,2组449例。匹配后,对1组患者和2组中的64例患者进行分析。1组所有患者均为男性,平均年龄56岁。中位放疗剂量为69Gy。两组间吻合口漏、肺炎、呼吸衰竭和再次手术的发生率相当。然而,1组声带麻痹的发生率更高,尤其是在接受喉返神经淋巴结清扫的患者中(37.5%)。1组和2组的3年总生存期(69.6%对75.2%;p = 0.26)和无复发生存期(50.8%对55.9%;p = 0.63)相似。总之,有或无既往HNC放疗的ESCC患者围手术期和肿瘤学结局相当,支持食管切除术作为一种可行的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验