Ryu Hee-Kyung, Kim Seong-Ah, Shin Hee-Jong, Park Chan-Kee, Park Hae-Young Lopilly
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 1;13(21):6585. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216585.
The aim of this study was to identify the most reliable ocular exam and establish a threshold for deciding whether to perform neuroimaging in order to screen for diverse diseases other than normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). A retrospective, observational, comparative study was used. In total, 106 individuals with atypical features of NTG who underwent glaucoma assessments and contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain or orbit were included. The criteria for atypical NTG included the following: (1) unilateral normal-tension glaucoma, (2) visual field (VF) damage inconsistent with optic disc appearance, (3) fast VF progression, (4) worsening of visual acuity, (5) optic disc pallor, (6) scotoma restricted by a vertical line, and (7) central scotoma. Glaucoma evaluations included measurements of visual acuity, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, axial length, cup-disc ratio, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, mean deviation (MD), and visual field index (VFI). Statistical analyses involved independent -tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the curve (AUC) in order to differentiate neuro-ophthalmological conditions from NTG, compare the diagnostic power of each factor, and determine the cut-off value. Relatively fewer diagnoses of non-glaucomatous diseases were associated with unilateral NTG, the worsening of VA, and central scotoma. Factors such as rapid visual field progression, optic disc pallor, and scotoma restricted by a vertical line had a relatively higher diagnostic rate of non-glaucomatous diseases. There were significant differences in average RNFL and GCIPL thicknesses at the nasal quadrant between NTG and NTG-mimicking conditions. Only the GCIPL thickness at the nasal quadrant had reliable power for discriminating between neuro-ophthalmological disease and NTG. For the GCIPL thickness at the nasal quadrant, the AUC was 0.659, and the cut-off value was 65.75. When deciding whether to proceed with imaging, such as carrying out an MRI test, for NTG patients with atypical NTG characteristics, it would be advisable to consider the nasal sector cut-off value of GCIPL thickness.
本研究的目的是确定最可靠的眼部检查方法,并建立一个阈值,以决定是否进行神经影像学检查,从而筛查除正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)以外的各种疾病。采用回顾性、观察性、对比研究。总共纳入了106例具有NTG非典型特征且接受了青光眼评估以及脑部或眼眶对比增强MRI检查的个体。NTG非典型特征的标准包括:(1)单侧正常眼压性青光眼;(2)视野(VF)损害与视盘外观不一致;(3)VF快速进展;(4)视力恶化;(5)视盘苍白;(6)暗点受垂直线限制;(7)中心暗点。青光眼评估包括视力、眼压、中央角膜厚度、眼轴长度、杯盘比、视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度、神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)厚度、平均偏差(MD)和视野指数(VFI)的测量。统计分析采用独立样本t检验、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC),以区分神经眼科疾病与NTG,比较各因素的诊断能力,并确定临界值。与单侧NTG、视力恶化和中心暗点相关的非青光眼疾病诊断相对较少。视野快速进展、视盘苍白和暗点受垂直线限制等因素对非青光眼疾病的诊断率相对较高。NTG与类似NTG情况在鼻象限的平均RNFL和GCIPL厚度存在显著差异。只有鼻象限的GCIPL厚度具有区分神经眼科疾病和NTG的可靠能力。对于鼻象限的GCIPL厚度,AUC为0.659,临界值为65.75。对于具有NTG非典型特征的NTG患者,在决定是否进行成像检查(如MRI检查)时,考虑GCIPL厚度的鼻区临界值是 advisable 的。 (注:“advisable”直译为“明智的、可取的”,这里结合语境意译为“ advisable 的”,以便更通顺,但严格来说这不属于翻译内容,只是为了让句子更符合中文表达习惯。)