Apathy Nate C, Hicks Katelyn, Bocknek Lucy, Zabala Garrett, Adams Katharine, Gomes Kylie M, Saggar Tara
Health Policy & Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
JAMIA Open. 2024 Nov 11;7(4):ooae135. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae135. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Patient messaging to clinicians has dramatically increased since the pandemic, leading to informatics efforts to categorize incoming messages. We examined how message prioritization (as distinct from categorization) occurs in primary care, and how primary care clinicians managed their inbox workflows.
Semi-structured interviews and inbox work observations with 11 primary care clinicians at MedStar Health. We analyzed interview and observation transcripts and identified themes and subthemes related to prioritization and inbox workflows.
Clinicians widely reported that they did not prioritize messages due to time constraints and the necessity of attending to all messages, which made any prioritization purely additive to overall inbox time. We identified 6 themes and 14 subthemes related to managing inbox workloads. The top themes were (1) establishing workflow norms with different teams, primarily medical assistants (MAs); (2) boundary-setting with patients, other clinicians, and with themselves; and (3) message classification heuristics that allowed clinicians to mentally categorize messages that required follow-up, messages that could be quickly deleted or acknowledged, and purely informational messages that ranged in clinical utility from tedious to valuable for care coordination.
Time constraints in primary care prevent clinicians from prioritizing their inbox messages for increased efficiency. Involvement of MAs and co-located staff was successful; however, standardization was needed for messaging workflows that involved centralized resources like call centers. Organizations should consider ways in which they can support the establishment and maintenance of boundaries, to avoid this responsibility falling entirely on clinicians.
Clinicians generally lack the time to prioritize patient messages. Future research should explore the efficacy of collaborative inbox workflows for time-savings and management of patient messages.
自疫情以来,患者向临床医生发送的信息大幅增加,这促使人们努力对收到的信息进行分类。我们研究了基层医疗中信息优先级排序(与分类不同)是如何发生的,以及基层医疗临床医生如何管理他们的收件箱工作流程。
对MedStar Health的11名基层医疗临床医生进行半结构化访谈和收件箱工作观察。我们分析了访谈和观察记录,并确定了与优先级排序和收件箱工作流程相关的主题和子主题。
临床医生普遍表示,由于时间限制以及需要处理所有信息,他们不会对信息进行优先级排序,这使得任何优先级排序都只是增加了处理整个收件箱信息的时间。我们确定了6个与管理收件箱工作量相关的主题和14个子主题。首要主题包括:(1)与不同团队,主要是医疗助理(MA)建立工作流程规范;(2)与患者、其他临床医生以及他们自己设定界限;(3)信息分类启发法,使临床医生能够在脑海中对需要跟进的信息、可以快速删除或确认的信息以及临床实用性从繁琐到对护理协调有价值不等的纯信息性信息进行分类。
基层医疗中的时间限制使临床医生无法为提高效率而对收件箱信息进行优先级排序。医疗助理和同地办公人员的参与取得了成功;然而,对于涉及呼叫中心等集中资源的信息传递工作流程,需要进行标准化。组织应考虑如何支持界限的建立和维护,以避免这一责任完全落在临床医生身上。
临床医生通常没有时间对患者信息进行优先级排序。未来的研究应探索协作式收件箱工作流程在节省时间和管理患者信息方面的效果。