• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者获取电子健康信息的进展和持续差距。

Progress and Persistent Disparities in Patient Access to Electronic Health Information.

机构信息

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e233883. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3883.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3883
PMID:37948063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10638642/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patient access to electronic health information (EHI) available via online medical records and through patient portals has been shown to help individuals make informed health decisions, which are associated with better health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess progress in patient engagement with EHI and to identify racial or ethnic disparities in access to patient portals.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a repeated cross-sectional study using data from the US Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey of US adults that tracks individuals' access and use of their health information. Six cycles of HINTS were included (2014, 2017-2020, 2022); data for the disparities analysis came from the 2022 HINTS. Data analyses were performed in April 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient reports of (1) being offered portal access by a health care provider (HCP); (2) being encouraged by the HCP to use the portal; (3) accessing their portal; and (4) using the portal for various purposes. Additional key measures included methods used to access portals and self-reported ease of understanding information contained in the online medical records or portals.

RESULTS

The total study population included 22 266 individuals (mean [SE] age, 49.9 [0.15] years) of whom 13 348 (54%) were female; 909 (5%) self-identified as Asian, 3523 (12%) as Black, 3178 (14%) as Hispanic, 13 555 (66%) as White, and 785 (3%) as another or more than 1 race. Nationally, patient portal access increased each year from 2014 through 2022, with a 46% increase observed between 2020 (n = 3319) and 2022 (n = 5437). However, in 2022, Black and Hispanic individuals reported being offered access to a portal by their HCP at significantly lower rates compared with White individuals (73% vs 81%; χ21 = 22.24; P < .001; and 62% vs 81%; χ21 = 135.57; P < .001, respectively) as well as accessing a patient portal at lower rates (60% vs 70%; χ21 = 23.80; P < .001; and 57% vs 70%; χ21 = 49.02; P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this repeated cross-sectional study of US adult respondents to the HINTS suggest that access to and engagement with patient portals increased significantly from 2014 through 2022, but racial and ethnic disparities in patient access persisted in 2022. However, there were no significant differences in use or understanding of information available in the online medical records among those who accessed them, which suggests that efforts to promote equitable opportunities to access EHI would likely be associated with increased patient access.

摘要

重要性

患者可以通过在线病历和患者门户访问电子健康信息(EHI),这已被证明有助于个人做出明智的健康决策,从而改善健康结果。

目的

评估患者对 EHI 的参与程度,并确定在获得患者门户方面是否存在种族或民族差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项使用来自美国健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)的数据进行的重复横断面研究,该调查是一项针对美国成年人的全国代表性调查,跟踪个人获取和使用其健康信息的情况。共纳入了 HINTS 的六个周期(2014 年、2017-2020 年、2022 年);差异分析的数据来自 2022 年 HINTS。数据分析于 2023 年 4 月进行。

主要结果和测量

患者报告(1)医疗保健提供者提供门户访问的情况;(2)医疗保健提供者鼓励使用门户的情况;(3)访问其门户的情况;以及(4)使用门户进行各种目的的情况。其他关键措施包括用于访问门户的方法以及自我报告对在线病历或门户中包含的信息的理解程度。

结果

总研究人群包括 22266 名个体(平均[SE]年龄,49.9[0.15]岁),其中 13348 名(54%)为女性;909 名(5%)自我认定为亚洲人,3523 名(12%)为黑人,3178 名(14%)为西班牙裔,13555 名(66%)为白人,785 名(3%)为其他种族或多种族。从 2014 年到 2022 年,患者门户的访问量每年都在增加,2020 年(n=3319)和 2022 年(n=5437)之间的增长率为 46%。然而,在 2022 年,与白人相比,黑人(73%比 81%;χ21=22.24;P<0.001)和西班牙裔(62%比 81%;χ21=135.57;P<0.001)的个体报告获得 HCP 提供的门户访问的比例较低,并且访问患者门户的比例也较低(60%比 70%;χ21=23.80;P<0.001;和 57%比 70%;χ21=49.02;P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

这项对 HINTS 美国成年受访者的重复横断面研究结果表明,从 2014 年到 2022 年,患者对门户的访问量和参与度显著增加,但在 2022 年,患者获取门户的机会仍然存在种族和民族差异。然而,在使用或理解在线病历中的信息方面,访问者之间没有显著差异,这表明促进公平获取 EHI 的努力可能与增加患者访问量有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/80c7e61662c1/jamahealthforum-e233883-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/bd1ca77bb72e/jamahealthforum-e233883-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/a66ac452a3a5/jamahealthforum-e233883-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/ff9e1e1aa3ab/jamahealthforum-e233883-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/80c7e61662c1/jamahealthforum-e233883-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/bd1ca77bb72e/jamahealthforum-e233883-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/a66ac452a3a5/jamahealthforum-e233883-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/ff9e1e1aa3ab/jamahealthforum-e233883-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00b8/10638642/80c7e61662c1/jamahealthforum-e233883-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Progress and Persistent Disparities in Patient Access to Electronic Health Information.患者获取电子健康信息的进展和持续差距。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e233883. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3883.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
3
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Portal and Telehealth Uptake and Use in a Minoritized, Low-Income Community: Mixed Methods Study.少数族裔低收入社区使用门户网站和远程医疗的相关因素:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 31;9:e70146. doi: 10.2196/70146.
2
Patients' Understanding of Health Information in Online Medical Records and Patient Portals: Analysis of the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey.患者对在线病历和患者门户网站中健康信息的理解:2022年健康信息国家趋势调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 30;27:e62696. doi: 10.2196/62696.
3
Who Uses Patient Portals? A National Cross-Sectional Study Using Epic Cosmos.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives of Patients About Immediate Access to Test Results Through an Online Patient Portal.患者对通过在线患者门户即时获取检验结果的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233572. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3572.
2
Disparities in patient portal access by US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国成年人在新冠疫情之前及期间使用患者门户网站的差异。
JAMIA Open. 2022 Dec 16;5(4):ooac104. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac104. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Disparities in patient portal access and the role of providers in encouraging access and use.
谁在使用患者门户网站?一项使用Epic Cosmos的全国性横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09585-5.
4
Patient Portals and Shared Decision-Making in US Adults With or at Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.美国患有心血管疾病或有心血管疾病风险的成年人的患者门户网站与共同决策:一项横断面研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039217. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039217. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
5
New Horizons for Consumer-Mediated Health Information Exchange.消费者介导的健康信息交换的新视野。
Yearb Med Inform. 2024 Aug;33(1):179-190. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800741. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
6
Repeated Access to Patient Portal While Awaiting Test Results and Patient-Initiated Messaging.在等待检查结果期间重复访问患者门户以及患者发起的消息传递。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254019. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4019.
7
Patient Factors Associated With the Use of Online Portal Health Information in the Postpandemic Era: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey.疫情后时代与在线门户健康信息使用相关的患者因素:一项全国性调查的横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 3;27:e60472. doi: 10.2196/60472.
8
Multilevel Intervention to Increase Patient Portal Use in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Who Access Health Care at Community Health Centers: Single Arm, Pre-Post Pilot Study.多层面干预以提高在社区卫生中心接受医疗服务的2型糖尿病成人患者对患者门户网站的使用:单臂前后对照试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 25;9:e67293. doi: 10.2196/67293.
9
Advancing cancer care through digital access in the USA: a state-of-the-art review of patient portals in oncology.通过美国的数字接入推进癌症护理:肿瘤学患者门户网站的最新综述
BMJ Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;4(1):e000432. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000432. eCollection 2025.
10
Transforming research recruitment: Leveraging EHR systems and patient portals.变革研究招募:利用电子健康记录系统和患者门户。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 26;9(1):e10. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.692. eCollection 2025.
患者门户访问的差异以及提供者在鼓励访问和使用方面的作用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jan 18;30(2):308-317. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac227.
4
The State of Telehealth Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情前后的远程医疗状况。
Prim Care. 2022 Dec;49(4):517-530. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Addressing virtual care disparities for patients with limited English proficiency.解决英语水平有限的患者的虚拟医疗服务差距问题。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Jan;28(1):36-40. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88814.
6
Barriers to accessing online medical records in the United States.美国获取在线医疗记录的障碍。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan;27(1):33-40. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88575.
7
Trends in Outpatient Care Delivery and Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US.美国新冠疫情期间门诊医疗服务与远程医疗的趋势
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):388-391. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5928.
8
Trends in the Use of Telehealth During the Emergence of the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, January-March 2020.COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗使用趋势 - 美国,2020 年 1 月至 3 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1595-1599. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3.
9
Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.促进住院电子病历参与度的患者门户:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779. doi: 10.2196/12779.
10
Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.提高弱势群体使用患者门户的干预措施:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):855-870. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz023.