Balas E Andrew, De Leo Gianluca, Shaw Kelly B
Biomedical Research Innovation Laboratory, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Department of Health Management, Economics and Policy, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Politics Life Sci. 2025;44(1):108-119. doi: 10.1017/pls.2024.10. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
Emerging societal expectations from biomedical research and intensifying international scientific competition are becoming existential matters. Based on a review of pertinent evidence, this article analyzes challenges and formulates public policy recommendations for improving productivity and impact of life sciences. Critical risks include widespread quality defects of research, particularly non-reproducible results, and narrow access to scientifically sound information giving advantage to health misinformation. In funding life sciences, the simultaneous shift to nondemocratic societies is an added challenge. Simply spending more on research will not be enough in the global competition. Considering the pacesetter role of the federal government, five national policy recommendations are put forward: (i) funding projects with comprehensive expectations of reproducibility; (ii) public-private partnerships for contemporaneous quality support in laboratories; (iii) making research institutions accountable for quality control; (iv) supporting new quality filtering standards for scientific journals and repositories, and (v) establishing a new network of centers for scientific health communications.
社会对生物医学研究不断涌现的期望以及日益激烈的国际科学竞争正成为事关生存的问题。基于对相关证据的审查,本文分析了挑战,并为提高生命科学的生产力和影响力制定了公共政策建议。关键风险包括研究中普遍存在的质量缺陷,尤其是不可重复的结果,以及获取科学可靠信息的渠道狭窄,这使得健康错误信息占据优势。在为生命科学提供资金方面,同时向非民主社会的转变是一个额外的挑战。在全球竞争中,仅仅增加研究经费是不够的。考虑到联邦政府的引领作用,提出了五项国家政策建议:(i)资助对可重复性有全面预期的项目;(ii)公私伙伴关系以同时为实验室提供质量支持;(iii)让研究机构对质量控制负责;(iv)支持科学期刊和知识库的新质量筛选标准,以及(v)建立新的科学健康传播中心网络。