Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
Social Resilience Lab, Center for Humanities Computing, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 13;89(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02043-7.
This study investigates the impact of the reflective-impulsive dimension of cognitive styles on recollection and the accuracy of a criminal events. In a VR-based experimental study, 150 participants were exposed to both criminal and neutral scenarios and subsequently asked to report everything they remembered about them. Cognitive styles were assessed using a computer-administered Matching Familiar Figures Test. The findings highlight that individuals with a reflective cognitive style consistently provided detailed descriptions of the events, irrespective of the context of encoding. In contrast, individuals with an impulsive cognitive style displayed context-specific effects, notably reduced performance when recalling emotionally charged criminal events. Notably, cognitive style did not moderate the accuracy of testimony. Given that the subjects who observed the crime achieved a lower overall accuracy rate than those who observed the neutral video, it appears that accuracy is directly affected by the criminal content.
本研究调查了认知风格的反思-冲动维度对回忆和犯罪事件准确性的影响。在一项基于虚拟现实的实验研究中,150 名参与者接触了犯罪和中性场景,并随后被要求报告他们对这些场景的所有记忆。认知风格使用计算机管理的匹配熟悉图形测试进行评估。研究结果表明,具有反思认知风格的个体始终提供了关于事件的详细描述,而不论编码的上下文如何。相比之下,具有冲动认知风格的个体表现出特定于上下文的影响,特别是在回忆情绪激动的犯罪事件时表现出较低的表现。值得注意的是,认知风格并没有调节证词的准确性。由于观察犯罪的受试者的总体准确性低于观察中性视频的受试者,因此准确性似乎直接受到犯罪内容的影响。