• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

排列位置会影响基于猜测的选择,但不会影响同时和连续列队中的嫌疑存在检测。

Lineup position affects guessing-based selection but not culprit-presence detection in simultaneous and sequential lineups.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78936-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-78936-9
PMID:39532964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11557592/
Abstract

The two-high threshold eyewitness identification model was applied to investigate the effects of lineup position on the latent cognitive processes underlying eyewitness responses in lineups. In two experiments with large sample sizes and random assignment of culprits and innocent suspects to all possible lineup positions, we examined how detection-based and non-detection-based processes vary across the positions of six-person photo lineups. Experiment 1 (N = 2586) served to investigate position effects in simultaneous lineups in which all photos were presented in a single row. Experiment 2 (N = 2581) was focused on sequential lineups. In both experiments, lineup position had no effect on the detection of the presence of the culprit. Guessing-based selection, in contrast, differed as a function of lineup position. Specifically, a lineup member placed in the first position in a lineup was significantly more likely to be selected based on guessing than lineup members placed in other positions. These results justify the practice of avoiding to place the suspect in the first position in a lineup, as this placement increases the suspect's chance of being selected based on guessing.

摘要

采用双阈限目击者识别模型,研究了在列队辨认中,辨认位置对目击者反应背后潜在认知过程的影响。在两个具有较大样本量且随机分配罪犯和无辜嫌疑人到所有可能的辨认位置的实验中,我们考察了在 6 人照片辨认列队中,基于检测和非基于检测的过程如何随位置而变化。实验 1(N=2586)用于研究同时辨认列队中的位置效应,其中所有照片都呈现在一行中。实验 2(N=2581)则专注于序列辨认列队。在这两个实验中,辨认位置对检测到罪犯的存在没有影响。相反,基于猜测的选择则因辨认位置而异。具体来说,与放置在其他位置的辨认成员相比,放置在辨认列队首位的辨认成员更有可能基于猜测而被选中。这些结果证明了避免将嫌疑人放在辨认列队首位的做法是合理的,因为这种放置会增加嫌疑人基于猜测而被选中的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/11557592/1509b73c2b9f/41598_2024_78936_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/11557592/7f7724753c9e/41598_2024_78936_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/11557592/83b27eb86a2d/41598_2024_78936_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/11557592/1509b73c2b9f/41598_2024_78936_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/11557592/7f7724753c9e/41598_2024_78936_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/11557592/83b27eb86a2d/41598_2024_78936_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/11557592/1509b73c2b9f/41598_2024_78936_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Lineup position affects guessing-based selection but not culprit-presence detection in simultaneous and sequential lineups.排列位置会影响基于猜测的选择,但不会影响同时和连续列队中的嫌疑存在检测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78936-9.
2
On the possible advantages of combining small lineups with instructions that discourage guessing-based selection.关于将小型阵容与不鼓励基于猜测的选择的指示相结合的可能优势。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):14126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64768-0.
3
The effects of lineup size on the processes underlying eyewitness decisions. lineup 大小对目击者决策背后过程的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):17190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44003-y.
4
Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.嫌疑人与陪衬者之间的表型不匹配而非表型偏差会增加对黑人嫌疑人的目击证人指认。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1233782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1233782. eCollection 2024.
5
The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.单一列队范式:一种在目击者识别实验中操纵目标存在的新方法。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Feb;42(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000272.
6
Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.阵容构成、嫌疑人位置以及序列阵容优势。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Jun;14(2):118-128. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.118.
7
A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data.重新分析已发表的数据验证双高阈限目击者辨认模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 4;12(1):13379. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17400-y.
8
Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.使用多项处理树模型从目击者识别数据衡量阵容公平性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33101-6.
9
Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics.同时呈现和依次呈现阵容中的目击证人辨认:使用接受者操作特征对位置效应的一项调查。
Memory. 2018 Oct;26(9):1297-1309. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1464581. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
10
Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions.多分类处理树模型分析目击证人辨认决策的实验验证。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 16;12(1):15571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19513-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Delays reduce culprit-presence detection but do not affect guessing-based selection in response to lineups.延迟会降低对犯罪嫌疑人在场的检测,但不影响对列队辨认的基于猜测的选择。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13937-w.

本文引用的文献

1
On the possible advantages of combining small lineups with instructions that discourage guessing-based selection.关于将小型阵容与不鼓励基于猜测的选择的指示相结合的可能优势。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):14126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64768-0.
2
On the advantages of using AI-generated images of filler faces for creating fair lineups.利用 AI 生成的填充物人脸图像创建公平的列队的优势。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 29;14(1):12304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63004-z.
3
The effects of lineup size on the processes underlying eyewitness decisions. lineup 大小对目击者决策背后过程的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):17190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44003-y.
4
How to develop, test, and extend multinomial processing tree models: A tutorial.如何开发、测试和扩展多项加工树模型:教程
Psychol Methods. 2023 Jul 27. doi: 10.1037/met0000561.
5
Evaluating the impact of first-yes-counts instructions on eyewitness performance using the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model.运用双高阈限目击者识别模型评估首肯计数指令对目击者表现的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 21;13(1):6572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33424-4.
6
Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.使用多项处理树模型从目击者识别数据衡量阵容公平性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33101-6.
7
Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions.多分类处理树模型分析目击证人辨认决策的实验验证。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 16;12(1):15571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19513-w.
8
A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data.重新分析已发表的数据验证双高阈限目击者辨认模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 4;12(1):13379. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17400-y.
9
Remembering the bad ones: Does the source memory advantage for cheaters influence our later actions positively?记住不好的事情:骗子的源记忆优势是否会对我们的后续行为产生积极影响?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Oct;74(10):1669-1685. doi: 10.1177/17470218211007822. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
"Only your first yes will count": The impact of prelineup instructions on sequential lineup decisions.“只有你的第一个‘是’才会算数”:预指认指示对连续辨认决策的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Mar;27(1):170-186. doi: 10.1037/xap0000337. Epub 2020 Oct 29.