Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Ga-Chon University, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Department of Sasang Constitutional Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Sang-Ji University & Research Institute of Korean Medicine, Sangji University, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 13;19(11):e0313789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313789. eCollection 2024.
Cold hypersensitivity in the hands and feet(CHHF) is a common condition that reduces the quality of life and causes daily discomfort. The current treatments are primarily pharmacological. This study aimed to expand treatment options by comparing the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) and acupuncture (AC) with that of no treatment (control).
A three-group randomized controlled trial was conducted with 72 women diagnosed with cold hypersensitivity in the hands and feet, as confirmed by subjective symptoms and objective temperature differences. Participants were randomly assigned to the EA, AC, or control groups. Outcome measures included hand and feet visual analog scale (VAS) scores, temperature changes measured using a non-contact thermometer, and World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) scores assessed at pretreatment (T0), posttreatment (T1), and follow-up (T2). Repeated measures ANOVA and 2-way mixed-model ANOVA were used to evaluate group, time, and interaction effects.
Both the EA and AC groups showed significant improvements in hand and feet VAS and WHOQOL-BREF scores compared with those of the control group posttreatment (T1). Notably, the EA group demonstrated sustained benefits at follow-up (T2), with significant reductions in feet VAS scores and positive changes in several WHOQOL-BREF domains. Interaction effects between group and time were observed, indicating that the changes in the EA and AC groups were meaningfully different form those in the control group. The control group also exhibited a statistically significant reduction in the VAS scores at follow-up (T2), likely due to the natural variability of cold extremity symptoms and psychological factors.
This study demonstrated that EA and AC are effective in alleviating the symptoms of CHHF and enhancing the quality of life compared to no treatment. EA showed long-lasting effects than those of AC, suggesting its potential to regulate the autonomic nervous system. These findings provide a foundation for expanding non-pharmacological treatment options for CHHF and offer clinical guidance on the use of EA and AC.
手脚冷过敏(CHHF)是一种常见病症,降低生活质量并导致日常不适。目前的治疗主要是药物治疗。本研究旨在通过比较电针(EA)和针刺(AC)与不治疗(对照组)的疗效,扩大治疗选择。
对 72 名被诊断为手脚冷过敏的女性进行了三组随机对照试验,这些女性的诊断依据是主观症状和客观温度差异。参与者被随机分配到 EA、AC 或对照组。主要观察指标包括手部和足部视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、使用非接触式温度计测量的温度变化以及治疗前(T0)、治疗后(T1)和随访(T2)的世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)评分。采用重复测量方差分析和 2 因素混合模型方差分析评估组间、时间和交互作用的影响。
与对照组相比,治疗后(T1),EA 和 AC 组手部和足部 VAS 评分和 WHOQOL-BREF 评分均显著改善。值得注意的是,EA 组在随访(T2)时仍有持续获益,足部 VAS 评分显著降低,WHOQOL-BREF 多个领域出现积极变化。组间和时间的交互作用表明,EA 和 AC 组的变化与对照组有显著差异。对照组在随访(T2)时 VAS 评分也有统计学意义的降低,这可能是由于冷肢症状的自然变异性和心理因素所致。
本研究表明,与不治疗相比,EA 和 AC 可有效缓解 CHHF 症状,提高生活质量。与 AC 相比,EA 具有持久的疗效,提示其可能对自主神经系统有调节作用。这些发现为 CHHF 的非药物治疗选择提供了依据,并为 EA 和 AC 的临床应用提供了指导。