• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国新闻荒漠中网络信息获取的评估

An evaluation of online information acquisition in US news deserts.

机构信息

Princeton University, Princeton, USA.

New York University, New York, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 13;14(1):27780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77303-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-77303-y
PMID:39537745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11560965/
Abstract

A growing concern is that as local newspapers disappear, communities lose trusted gatekeepers and develop information voids, creating openings for misinformation to thrive. Previous work has not evaluated whether residents of news deserts have developed different information acquisition habits. We fill this gap by directly comparing information consumption and referral patterns inside and outside of news deserts in a novel dataset of engagement with online media by millions of users on the Edge browser. We find little evidence that those in news deserts consume more low-quality sites or are more likely to be referred to low-quality sites from search engines or social media. We find some evidence that those in news deserts do consume more national news than locations with local media outlets. These results contribute to our understanding of how the loss of local newspapers has impacted online information acquisition.

摘要

人们越来越担心的是,随着地方报纸的消失,社区失去了可信赖的把关人,出现了信息空白,为错误信息的传播创造了机会。之前的研究尚未评估新闻荒漠地区的居民是否已经形成了不同的信息获取习惯。我们通过直接比较新闻荒漠内外的信息消费和推荐模式,填补了这一空白。我们在 Edge 浏览器的一个新的在线媒体参与的数据集上进行了研究,该数据集涉及数百万用户。我们发现几乎没有证据表明新闻荒漠地区的居民会更多地访问低质量网站,或者更有可能从搜索引擎或社交媒体上被推荐到低质量网站。我们发现一些证据表明,新闻荒漠地区的居民比有地方媒体的地区更关注国家新闻。这些结果有助于我们了解地方报纸的消失对在线信息获取产生了怎样的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/bc55d9b2c2d8/41598_2024_77303_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/c5a0470a840f/41598_2024_77303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/c8d685df1714/41598_2024_77303_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/bf88ce075496/41598_2024_77303_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/2a59828d0c88/41598_2024_77303_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/bc55d9b2c2d8/41598_2024_77303_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/c5a0470a840f/41598_2024_77303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/c8d685df1714/41598_2024_77303_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/bf88ce075496/41598_2024_77303_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/2a59828d0c88/41598_2024_77303_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b8a/11560965/bc55d9b2c2d8/41598_2024_77303_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An evaluation of online information acquisition in US news deserts.美国新闻荒漠中网络信息获取的评估
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 13;14(1):27780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77303-y.
2
Online searches to evaluate misinformation can increase its perceived veracity.在线搜索评估错误信息可能会增加其被感知的真实性。
Nature. 2024 Jan;625(7995):548-556. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06883-y. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
Search engines, news wires and digital epidemiology: Presumptions and facts.搜索引擎、新闻专线和数字流行病学:假设与事实。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
4
Understanding Health Communication Through Google Trends and News Coverage for COVID-19: Multinational Study in Eight Countries.通过谷歌趋势和新冠疫情新闻报道理解健康传播:八国跨国研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 21;7(12):e26644. doi: 10.2196/26644.
5
Internet-based information-seeking behavior for transient ischemic attack.短暂性脑缺血发作的基于互联网的信息寻求行为。
Int J Stroke. 2015 Dec;10(8):1212-6. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12593. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
6
Social Media News Use and COVID-19 Misinformation Engagement: Survey Study.社交媒体新闻使用与新冠病毒错误信息接触:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 20;24(9):e38944. doi: 10.2196/38944.
7
Biased online media coverage: chiropractic and stroke in google news.有偏见的在线媒体报道:谷歌新闻中整脊疗法与中风的关系
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Jun 21;26:21. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0189-8. eCollection 2018.
8
News and misinformation consumption: A temporal comparison across European countries.新闻和错误信息消费:欧洲国家的时间比较。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0302473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302473. eCollection 2024.
9
Setting the agenda in environmental crisis: Relationships between tweets, Google search trends, and newspaper coverage during the California drought.设定环境危机议程:加州干旱期间推文、谷歌搜索趋势和报纸报道之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0259494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259494. eCollection 2021.
10
The Relationship among COVID-19 Information Seeking, News Media Use, and Emotional Distress at the Onset of the Pandemic.新冠疫情期间信息搜索、新闻媒体使用与情绪困扰的关系
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;18(24):13198. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413198.

本文引用的文献

1
High level of correspondence across different news domain quality rating sets.不同新闻领域质量评级集之间的高度一致性。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Sep 2;2(9):pgad286. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad286. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election.2020 年美国大选期间接触不可信网站的情况。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1096-1105. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01564-2. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
The ephemeral effects of fact-checks on COVID-19 misperceptions in the United States, Great Britain and Canada.美国、英国和加拿大新冠错误认知的短暂性事实核查效应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Feb;6(2):236-243. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01278-3. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
4
Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to spread misinformation compared to other health topics.与其他健康话题相比,有关 COVID-19 的推文和 Facebook 帖子不太可能传播错误信息。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):e0261768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261768. eCollection 2022.
5
Neutral bots probe political bias on social media.中立机器人探测社交媒体上的政治偏见。
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 22;12(1):5580. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25738-6.
6
The sources and correlates of exposure to vaccine-related (mis)information online.网络中疫苗相关(错误)信息的来源和影响因素。
Vaccine. 2020 Nov 17;38(49):7799-7805. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.018. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Auditing local news presence on Google News.审计 Google 新闻上的本地新闻报道。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1236-1244. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00954-0. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India.数字媒体素养干预措施提高了美国和印度民众辨别主流新闻和虚假新闻的能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 7;117(27):15536-15545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920498117. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem.评估信息生态系统规模下的假新闻问题。
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 3;6(14):eaay3539. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3539. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election.2016 年美国大选中的不可信网站曝光。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):472-480. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x. Epub 2020 Mar 2.