Wolff Jennifer C, MacPherson Heather A, Brick Leslie A, DeMartino Emma, Maron Micaela, Elwy A Rani, Altemus Melanie, Hernandez Lynn, Spirito Anthony
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI.
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2024;9(4):544-560. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2023.2292026. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
Disruptive behaviors are the most common clinical presentation in children and adolescents, particularly among disadvantaged youth referred to community mental health clinics (CMHCs). When left unaddressed, disruptive behaviors can increase the risk of adverse mental health outcomes. While parenting interventions are known to be efficacious and efficient treatment approaches, there are many barriers to involvement in such programs, particularly for disadvantaged populations. This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated a technology-assisted parenting intervention (Parenting Wisely, PW) with therapist coaching compared to treatment as usual (TAU) at a CMHC. Participants included 53 caregiver-adolescent dyads and 13 clinicians recruited from a CMHC. Dyads randomized to PW + therapist coaching received a multi-component intervention that utilized a technology-assisted parenting program alongside therapist coaching sessions. Feasibility/acceptability assessments were conducted and preliminary findings on parenting outcomes and adolescent behavior outcomes were collected at 3- and 6-months post-baseline. Qualitative and quantitative results supported the feasibility and acceptability of the parenting PW + therapist coaching intervention as evidenced by caregiver engagement, therapist adherence, lack of treatment withdrawals, and satisfaction ratings. Exploratory analyses did not show differences between treatment conditions for parenting and adolescent behavioral outcomes. PW + therapist coaching may be better suited for early adolescents, who are at a critical period when disruptive behavior patterns are not yet ingrained, and parents have more authority and opportunity to address family interactions. Next steps for further evaluation include testing the effectiveness, predictors, moderators, and mechanisms of treatment outcomes of PW + therapist coaching as an adjunct to usual care.
破坏性行为是儿童和青少年中最常见的临床表现,在转介到社区心理健康诊所(CMHCs)的弱势青少年中尤为突出。如果不加以解决,破坏性行为会增加出现不良心理健康结果的风险。虽然已知养育干预措施是有效且高效的治疗方法,但参与此类项目存在许多障碍,尤其是对于弱势群体而言。这项试点随机对照试验在一家社区心理健康诊所评估了一种有治疗师指导的技术辅助养育干预措施(明智养育,PW)与常规治疗(TAU)的效果。参与者包括从一家社区心理健康诊所招募的53对照顾者 - 青少年二元组和13名临床医生。随机分配到PW +治疗师指导组的二元组接受了一项多成分干预措施,该措施使用了一个技术辅助养育项目以及治疗师指导课程。在基线后3个月和6个月进行了可行性/可接受性评估,并收集了关于养育结果和青少年行为结果的初步数据。定性和定量结果支持了养育PW +治疗师指导干预措施的可行性和可接受性,照顾者的参与度、治疗师的依从性、无治疗退出情况以及满意度评分都证明了这一点。探索性分析未显示治疗条件在养育和青少年行为结果方面存在差异。PW +治疗师指导可能更适合早期青少年,他们正处于破坏性行为模式尚未根深蒂固的关键时期,而且父母有更多的权威和机会来处理家庭互动。进一步评估的下一步包括测试PW +治疗师指导作为常规护理辅助手段的治疗效果、预测因素、调节因素和治疗结果机制。