Using data from cue presentations results in grossly overestimating semantic BCI performance.

Neuroimaging studies have reported the possibility of semantic neural decoding to identify specific semantic concepts from neural activity. This offers promise for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for communication. However, translating these findings into a BCI paradigm has proven challenging. Existing EEG-based semantic decoding studies often rely on neural activity recorded when a cue is present, raising concerns about decoding reliability. To address this, we investigate the effects of cue presentation on EEG-based semantic decoding. In an experiment with a clear separation between cue presentation and mental task periods, we attempt to differentiate between semantic categories of animals and tools in four mental tasks. By using state-of-the-art decoding analyses, we demonstrate significant mean classification accuracies up to 71.3% during cue presentation but not during mental tasks, even with adapted analyses from previous studies. These findings highlight a potential issue when using neural activity recorded during cue presentation periods for semantic decoding. Additionally, our results show that semantic decoding without external cues may be more challenging than current state-of-the-art research suggests. By bringing attention to these issues, we aim to stimulate discussion and drive advancements in the field toward more effective semantic BCI applications.